Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 It's amazing what you find when you go looking... See link in later post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Could you also tell us dummies what it all means? Thanks. Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 www.hmfckickback.co.uk/Atskaitomybe_2008_06_30.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Could you also tell us dummies what it all means? Thanks. Buffalo Bill . Absolutely no idea. Signed A N Other Dummy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmfc_steve Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Could you also tell us dummies what it all means? Thanks. Buffalo Bill . All makes perfect sense to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 From a 2 minute glance at the numbers: - profits are up, but are small scale - equivalent of $10.8m in the Q2 - not much point in looking at numbers on the P&L above 'financial and investing operations' as all the profits and most of the value is from investments - nearly $65m of financial debts due on a short term basis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigC Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 What currency is it in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Well they claim to be profitable, due to investment income in the P&L. And they don't appear to have any particular liquidity issue either judging by the BS. Haven't a clue what a Lita is worth. I prefer magic beans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Well they claim to be profitable, due to investment income in the P&L. And they don't appear to have any particular liquidity issue either judging by the BS. Haven't a clue what a Lita is worth. I prefer magic beans. 1 US $ is worth 2.358 Lita 1 GBP is worth 4.361 Lita Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 1 Lita = 0.22 pence I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 1 Lita = 0.22 pence I think Where did you get the accounts figures Dexter? Were the full accounts (including notes) available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 What currency is it in? Think right at the top of the balance sheet it states that it is in Litas Big C, think there is about 4.3 Litas to the ?1 Sterling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Would also note that due to substantial deferred tax assets on these accounts UBIG is paying no corporation tax! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Where did you get the accounts figures Dexter? Were the full accounts (including notes) available? They're on the Ubig website.... You just need to look hard enough.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bickfest Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 At L1 to ?0.229, they had net assets (presumably including the investment in Hearts) of approximately ?160 million and made a profit for the 6 months of ?5.9 million. Not sure if they're consolidated (ie including Hearts' numbers for the period). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 They're on the Ubig website.... You just need to look hard enough.... Well spotted. I had looked in the past but not hard enough! Found them, no notes to the accounts though! One other thought, a ?51m development at Tynecastle would be a huge burden on a company which currently has ?161m of total assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Well spotted. I had looked in the past but not hard enough! Found them, no notes to the accounts though! One other thought, a ?51m development at Tynecastle would be a huge burden on a company which currently has ?161m of total assets. Are you sure your 161m is correct ? I was sure it was way above that ? Would you not include buildings etc as assets ? I'd assume then their overall total would be more like 1.6billion ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tolcross lad Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 From a 2 minute glance at the numbers: - profits are up, but are small scale - equivalent of $10.8m in the Q2 - not much point in looking at numbers on the P&L above 'financial and investing operations' as all the profits and most of the value is from investments - nearly $65m of financial debts due on a short term basis A s one of the guys who seem to know about finance and who makes sense to me.Could you please spend a bit more time on this and give your opinion re stability of UBIG based on these figures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munch Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Bottom line is there enough cash to finance the construction of the new Stand ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troonjambo Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 It's amazing what you find when you go looking... See link in later post. want to dig out hbos figures or aig or Morgan Stanley or citygroups annual reports i know where your coming from re the hobos wind up merchants ect but this is really really meaningless stuff dex . at the end of the day you have just witnessed a dry run of what could happen any week re hearts going to the wall we are surviving on handouts from a guy who does not even attend games think thats good news i dont anyway im away to play with the traffic :sad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munch Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 want to dig out hbos figures or aig or Morgan Stanley or citygroups annual reports i know where your coming from re the hobos wind up merchants ect but this is really really meaningless stuff dex . at the end of the day you have just witnessed a dry run of what could happen any week re hearts going to the wall we are surviving on handouts from a guy who does not even attend games think thats good news i dont anyway im away to play with the traffic :sad: So what would happen if Tom Farmer kicks the bucket down fester road way ? he does not attend games either mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 want to dig out hbos figures or aig or Morgan Stanley or citygroups annual reports i know where your coming from re the hobos wind up merchants ect but this is really really meaningless stuff dex . at the end of the day you have just witnessed a dry run of what could happen any week re hearts going to the wall we are surviving on handouts from a guy who does not even attend games think thats good news i dont anyway im away to play with the traffic :sad: LOL not many football clubs are viable businesses on their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Are you sure your 161m is correct ? I was sure it was way above that ? Would you not include buildings etc as assets ? I'd assume then their overall total would be more like 1.6billion ? I think, and admit it is a wild guess, that if UBIG has assets of ?1.6 billion then problems would be non existent Dex. The figure that Coco has indicated is the same end figure I came to having read through the data you provided, i.e. about ?161.5m. With regards to property they own I would expect to see that shown under fixed assets, possibly tangible assets. Where they do appear to have taken a fairly big hit is in relation to sales costs, between March and June of this year (costs rose 10 fold), which would be in keeping with business and the market place in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONis Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 I've had a quick look and can give you a quick summary. I'll try not to pass any judgement but obviously I'll be highlighting the stuff I think is pertinent, which in itself my be prejudicial. These are not group accounts, they are UBIGs (assuming Dexter pulled the right file) Total Assets ?160m Total Liabilities ?63m So on the whole UBIG has Net Assets of circa ?100m I think what you all want to know about is liquidity, and this is where it gets trickier. Cash = ?1.25m, down from ?1.6m in the prior quarter. Current Assets in general (i.e. stuff that can be reasonably quickly turned into cash) Stocks & WIP ?17.4m Debtors Receivable ?49m Other Assets ??? ?2.45m The big question mark is whether or not they can convert these items into cash in the very short term. The other question mark is that ?31m of the debtors figure is owed from "susidiaries and associated companies" i.e. Hearts + Others. The point behind highlighting these items is that UBIG seem to be loaded with Short term debt (probably less than a year to repayment) see below. Liabilities Long term Debt ?7.5m Short term debt ?55m I'm not going to pass any further comment, but if you have any questions, I'll try to answer them. Yours aDONis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 LOL not many football clubs are viable businesses on their own. They are or would be if they were run correctly and lived within their means which is perfectly possible this however creates other footballing issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Bottom line is there enough cash to finance the construction of the new Stand ? The money for the stand would come from outside investors surely. Isnt that what Vlad wanted?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Baldmans Comb Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Bottom line is there enough cash to finance the construction of the new Stand ? Not a chance. Some worrying news but not as bad as many people in the media are trying to claim http://www.baltictimes.com/news/articles/21193/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 They are or would be if they were run correctly and lived within their means which is perfectly possible this however creates other footballing issues. Yep. like ambition. I'm sure plenty of wee clubs have no benefactor but big clubs attract them and need them - the needing and the attracting are "chicken and egg". Gretna did not probably need Mileson when he arrived but they sure did once they were in the SPL... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam Tarts 1874 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 The money for the stand would come from outside investors surely. Isnt that what Vlad wanted?? The last comment on this matter was given by Fedotovas, he talked of Hearts having partners in the project although I would think that the partners he was referring to would be involved in the Hotel/Offices/Accommodation etc. I imagine that UBIG will lend Hearts the dosh to build the stand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
secret1 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 HBOS had profits of 5700 Million in 2007 - helped them not one little bit, doesnt amatter how good you look on paper as a bank what matters is how exposed you are to debt That I dont know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zico Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 - nearly $65m of financial debts due on a short term basis Without notes, it's difficult to estimate what that debt might contain but one would presume that it's overdrafts and/or loans as opposed to any issued bonds. Anything else that might include that anyone can think of? Presumably if it is overdrafts/loans, the lack of liquidity in the market will make it difficult to roll it over without paying punitive rates (and would of course depend on the dates that receivables are due). Don't work in corporate finance myself but would be interesting to hear the thoughts of those that do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Yep. like ambition. I'm sure plenty of wee clubs have no benefactor but big clubs attract them and need them - the needing and the attracting are "chicken and egg". Gretna did not probably need Mileson when he arrived but they sure did once they were in the SPL... Chelsea must be close to being the worst run club in the world from a financial perspective - their accounts are an absolute horror story - their success on the pitch is irrelevant as they are burning through money hand over fist - Abramovich' gigantic wealth is masking their problems and none of his money has been GIFTED to Chelsea - they owe him / his companies ?500M+ in loans repayable within 18 months - they are as dependant on Abramovich as Gretna were on Mileson - everything is fine whilst the benefactor is subsidising the club - a massive house of cards which will tumble & fall though should any trouble befall the benefactor or his income. The UK should implement similar rules as exist in France, Germany, Holland, Belgium etc regards football clubs finances and the amount they can spend on players wages & debt borrowing in relation to earnings & assets. Football in the UK is being subsidised to a massively unsafe degree by Rich Benefactors and very generous TV deals however are these people or companies any more immune from financial woes than some of the worlds largest Banks & Finances companies who most assumed were the safest bets around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 HBOS had profits of 5700 Million in 2007 - helped them not one little bit, doesnt amatter how good you look on paper as a bank what matters is how exposed you are to debt That I dont know yup but having debt in itself is fine. It is the liquidity and value of that debt which is important. Those accounts indicate that liquidity is not likely to be an issue and we have to hope that the valuation is not either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam Tarts 1874 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 want to dig out hbos figures or aig or Morgan Stanley or citygroups annual reports i know where your coming from re the hobos wind up merchants ect but this is really really meaningless stuff dex . at the end of the day you have just witnessed a dry run of what could happen any week re hearts going to the wall we are surviving on handouts from a guy who does not even attend games think thats good news i dont anyway im away to play with the traffic :sad: Rubbish! The important aspect for Hearts or any other club is turnover v wages. You should wait and see what the accounts for the year ending 31.7.08. have to say before making such idiotic and inaccurate comments. The only way Hearts could go to the wall would be if UBIG decided to call in the remaining debt, if that happens Romanov automatically loses at least ?12million thanks to the recent conversion of debt to equity. Why would UBIG do this in order to have the remaining ?15m or so that we owe them repaid? Effectively closing Hearts down would only net them approximately ?3million, that is less than 3 years of interest payments. It just would not make any sense at all and frankly it is just plain stupid to even consider that it could happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peckhamjambo Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 HBOS had profits of 5700 Million in 2007 - helped them not one little bit, doesnt amatter how good you look on paper as a bank what matters is how exposed you are to debt That I dont know UBIG IS NOT A BANK! It is an investment group with interests in all sorts of business areas, this has been pointed out numerous times before on numerous threads. Ukio Bankas is the bank which sponsors us, of which UBIG and Romanov have a controlling interest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troonjambo Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 So what would happen if Tom Farmer kicks the bucket down fester road way ? he does not attend games either mate. nothing would happen same at ibrox same at parkhead they are not in dedt up to there eyeballs with no cash reserve what so ever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
secret1 Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 UBIG IS NOT A BANK! It is an investment group with interests in all sorts of business areas, this has been pointed out numerous times before on numerous threads. Ukio Bankas is the bank which sponsors us, of which UBIG and Romanov have a controlling interest. ok then look at AIG much much bigger - also in trouble Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tolcross lad Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 I've had a quick look and can give you a quick summary. I'll try not to pass any judgement but obviously I'll be highlighting the stuff I think is pertinent, which in itself my be prejudicial. These are not group accounts, they are UBIGs (assuming Dexter pulled the right file) Total Assets ?160m Total Liabilities ?63m So on the whole UBIG has Net Assets of circa ?100m I think what you all want to know about is liquidity, and this is where it gets trickier. Cash = ?1.25m, down from ?1.6m in the prior quarter. Current Assets in general (i.e. stuff that can be reasonably quickly turned into cash) Stocks & WIP ?17.4m Debtors Receivable ?49m Other Assets ??? ?2.45m The big question mark is whether or not they can convert these items into cash in the very short term. The other question mark is that ?31m of the debtors figure is owed from "susidiaries and associated companies" i.e. Hearts + Others. The point behind highlighting these items is that UBIG seem to be loaded with Short term debt (probably less than a year to repayment) see below. Liabilities Long term Debt ?7.5m Short term debt ?55m I'm not going to pass any further comment, but if you have any questions, I'll try to answer them. Yours aDONis Thanks for your analysis.Can you surmise what would constitute a short term and long term debt? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMBO.LOU Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 secret1 - i smell a hobo!!! most probably serge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 secret1 - i smell a hobo!!! most probably sergeThey are really obvious just now:107years: Registered since 2006 and only had 5 posts till today:rolleyes: The hobonomics bring them all out:hobofish: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Values in thousands LIT BALANCE SHEET 30/JUN/2008 No ASSETS 30Jun/08 30/Mar/08 A. Fixed assets 388,696 379,246 I. Intangible assets 221 202 I.1. Development expenses I.2. Goodwill I.3. Patents, licences I.4. Computer software 42 39 I.5. Other intangible assets 179 163 II. Tangible assets 3,542 3,561 II.1. Land II.2. Buildings and constructions II.3. Machinery II.4. Means of transport 441 494 II.5. Other equipment 516 482 II.6. Buildings and constructions in progress II.7. Other tangible assets 2,585 2,585 III. Financial assets 314,131 304,680 III.1. Investments into subsidiaries and associated 270,877 261,426 III.2. Loans to subsidiaries and associated companie III.3. Long-term receivables 43,254 43,254 III.4. Other financial assets IV. Investment assets 70,802 70,802 B. Current assets 305,555 308,436 I. Inventory, advance payments and contracts in 75,302 76,175 I.1. Inventory 22 17 I.1.1. Materials 22 17 I.1.2. Unfinished production I.1.3. Finished goods I.1.4. Goods for resale I.2. Advances paid 75,281 76,158 I.3. Contracts in progress II. Short-term receivables 214,153 212,720 II.1. Sales receivables 582 518 II.2. Debts of subsidiaries and associated companie 134,912 130,657 II.3. Other receivables 78,659 81,545 III. Other current assets 10,612 12,637 III.1. Short-term investments 10,612 12,637 III.2. Deposit accounts III.3. Other short term assets IV. Cash and cash equivalents 5,488 6,904 Total assets: 694,252 687,681 No EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 30Jun/08 30/Mar/08 C. Capital 421,932 416,601 I. Capital 211,895 211,895 I.1. Share capital (signed) 211,895 211,895 I.2. Share capital signed not paid (-) I.3. Share premium I.4. Own shares (-) II. Revaluation reserves (results) III. Reserves 184,483 184,483 III.1. Obligatory 158 158 III.2. For buying own shares III.3. Other reserves 184,325 184,325 IV. Unallocated profit (losses) 25,554 20,223 IV.1. Profit (losses) of current year 25,554 20,223 IV.2. Profit (losses) or previos years D. Grants, subsidies E. Payables and liabilities 272,320 271,081 I. Long-term payables and liabilities 32,578 32,592 I.1. Financial debts 54 68 I.1.1. Leasing and similar liabilities 54 68 I.1.2. To credit institutions I.1.3. Other financial debts I.2. Trade payables I.3. Advances received I.4. Provisions I.4.1. For claims and liabilities I.4.2. For pension and similar liabilities I.4.3. Other provisions I.5. Deferred tax liabilities 32,524 32,524 I.6. Other payables and long-term liabilities II. Short-term payables and liabilities 239,742 238,488 II.1. Current year portion of long-term debt II.2. Financial debts 153,663 150,536 II.2.1. To credit institutions II.2.2. Other debts 153,663 150,536 II.3. Trade payables II.4. Advances received 84,592 86,289 II.5. Profit tax liabilities II.6. Liabilities related to employees 486 484 II.7. Provisions II.8. Other payables and short-term liabilities 1,000 1,180 Total equity and liabilities: 694,252 687,681 PROFIT (LOSS) STATEMENT From 1st January 2008 to 30th June 2008 No ARTICLES 30Jun/08 30/Mar/08 I. SALES INCOME 2,635 2,290 II. COST OF SALES 11,029 1,030 III. GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) -8,395 1,259 IV. OPERATING EXPENSES 20,798 18,541 IV.1 Sales expenses IV.2 General and administration expenses 20,798 18,541 V. PROFIT (LOSS) FROM TYPICAL OPERATIONS -29,192 -17,282 VI. OTHER ACTIVITIES VI.1. Income VI.2. Expenses VII. FINANCIAL AND INVESTING OPERATIONS 54,746 37,504 VII.1. Income 215,005 191,515 VII.2. Expenses 160,259 154,011 VIII. PROFIT (LOSS) FROM ORDINARY OPERATIONS 25,554 20,223 IX. EXTRAORDINARY INCOME X. EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES XI. PROFIT (LOSS) BEFORE TAX 25,554 20,223 XII. PROFIT TAX XIII. NET PROFIT (LOSS) 25,554 20,223 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 They are really obvious just now:107years: Registered since 2006 and only had 5 posts till today:rolleyes: The hobonomics bring them all out:hobofish: god bless robbo, wayne foster, phil stamp and graeme weir! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peckhamjambo Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 ok then look at AIG much much bigger - also in trouble I could never be a teacher, I just don't have the patience to educate the uneducated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topcat Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Values in thousands GBP Calcuated at 1LIT = 0.2298GBP No ASSETS 30/Mar/08 30/Mar/08 A. Fixed assets 89,322 87,151 I. Intangible assets 51 47 I.1. Development expenses I.2. Goodwill I.3. Patents, licences I.4. Computer software 10 9 I.5. Other intangible assets 41 38 II. Tangible assets 814 818 II.1. Land II.2. Buildings and constructions II.3. Machinery II.4. Means of transport 101 113 II.5. Other equipment 119 111 II.6. Buildings and constructions in progress II.7. Other tangible assets 594 594 III. Financial assets 72,187 70,015 III.1. Investments into subsidiaries and associated 62,248 60,076 III.2. Loans to subsidiaries and associated companie III.3. Long-term receivables 9,940 9,940 III.4. Other financial assets IV. Investment assets 16,270 16,270 B. Current assets 70,217 70,879 I. Inventory, advance payments and contracts in 17,304 17,505 I.1. Inventory 5 4 I.1.1. Materials 5 4 I.1.2. Unfinished production I.1.3. Finished goods I.1.4. Goods for resale I.2. Advances paid 17,299 17,501 I.3. Contracts in progress II. Short-term receivables 49,212 48,883 II.1. Sales receivables 134 119 II.2. Debts of subsidiaries and associated companie 31,003 30,025 II.3. Other receivables 18,076 18,739 III. Other current assets 2,439 2,904 III.1. Short-term investments 2,439 2,904 III.2. Deposit accounts III.3. Other short term assets IV. Cash and cash equivalents 1,261 1,587 Total assets: 159,539 158,029 No EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 30/Mar/08 30/Mar/08 C. Capital 96,960 95,735 I. Capital 48,693 48,693 I.1. Share capital (signed) 48,693 48,693 I.2. Share capital signed not paid (-) I.3. Share premium I.4. Own shares (-) II. Revaluation reserves (results) III. Reserves 42,394 42,394 III.1. Obligatory 36 36 III.2. For buying own shares III.3. Other reserves 42,358 42,358 IV. Unallocated profit (losses) 5,872 4,647 IV.1. Profit (losses) of current year 5,872 4,647 IV.2. Profit (losses) or previos years D. Grants, subsidies E. Payables and liabilities 62,579 62,294 I. Long-term payables and liabilities 7,486 7,490 I.1. Financial debts 12 16 I.1.1. Leasing and similar liabilities 12 16 I.1.2. To credit institutions I.1.3. Other financial debts I.2. Trade payables I.3. Advances received I.4. Provisions I.4.1. For claims and liabilities I.4.2. For pension and similar liabilities I.4.3. Other provisions I.5. Deferred tax liabilities 7,474 7,474 I.6. Other payables and long-term liabilities II. Short-term payables and liabilities 55,093 54,805 II.1. Current year portion of long-term debt II.2. Financial debts 35,312 34,593 II.2.1. To credit institutions II.2.2. Other debts 35,312 34,593 II.3. Trade payables II.4. Advances received 19,439 19,829 II.5. Profit tax liabilities II.6. Liabilities related to employees 112 111 II.7. Provisions II.8. Other payables and short-term liabilities 230 271 Total equity and liabilities: 159,539 158,029 PROFIT (LOSS) STATEMENT From 1st January 2008 to 30th June 2008 I. SALES INCOME 605 526 II. COST OF SALES 2,535 237 III. GROSS PROFIT (LOSS) -1,929 289 IV. OPERATING EXPENSES 4,779 4,261 IV.1 Sales expenses IV.2 General and administration expenses 4,779 4,261 V. PROFIT (LOSS) FROM TYPICAL OPERATIONS -6,708 -3,971 VI. OTHER ACTIVITIES VI.1. Income VI.2. Expenses VII. FINANCIAL AND INVESTING OPERATIONS 12,581 8,618 VII.1. Income 49,408 44,010 VII.2. Expenses 36,828 35,392 VIII. PROFIT (LOSS) FROM ORDINARY OPERATIONS 5,872 4,647 IX. EXTRAORDINARY INCOME X. EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES XI. PROFIT (LOSS) BEFORE TAX 5,872 4,647 XII. PROFIT TAX XIII. NET PROFIT (LOSS) 5,872 4,647 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aDONis Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Thanks for your analysis.Can you surmise what would constitute a short term and long term debt? Hi Tolcross In the UK Short-term debt is generally seen as due within 1 year. Stuff that goes in there is stuff like; Trade Creditors Finance lease payments due in < 1year Overdrafts/loans repayable on demand HP contracts Monies owed to subsidiaries Other creditors (catch all) In the sheet Dexter got, there were 3 types; Other debts (?35m) Advances received (?19m) Liabilities to employees (?110k) Total (?55m) excuse rounding. If it is all due in less than one year, then I'd worry, but there may also be some mitigating factors. i.e. they could be loans from Emperor Vlad and his family, which although technically are repayable on demand, they may not need to call in. I have my opinions, but they would be little more than an informed guess, which is really just a fancy way of saying "guess". Yours aDONis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
castlerock Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 It's amazing what you find when you go looking... See link in later post. those are up to end of june. it may have escaped your attention, but in the interim, the banking sector has collapsed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Dave Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 What folk should also remember is that there has been a big focus on UBIG's fianances here. Isn't Romanov's personal wealth (not UBIG) meant to be quite high too? The Romanov's could well have taken 10's of millions out of the company in dividends, wages, bonuses etc over the years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavydavy Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 Bottom line is there enough cash to finance the construction of the new Stand ? They will not be financing a new stand on their on and have never intended to they are looking for other funding sources to invest a considerable contribution towards the total cost including the hotel development. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavydavy Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 What folk should also remember is that there has been a big focus on UBIG's fianances here. Isn't Romanov's personal wealth (not UBIG) meant to be quite high too? The Romanov's could well have taken 10's of millions out of the company in dividends, wages, bonuses etc over the years. When Romanov first took over Hearts his total wealth was put at some ?340 Million which would be his total worth not cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheriff Fatman Posted September 24, 2008 Share Posted September 24, 2008 those are up to end of june. it may have escaped your attention, but in the interim, the banking sector has collapsed. It may have escaped your attention, but UBIG isn't a bank. UKIO is and has increased it's profit in the last reported quarter. Admitedly it's share value has gone down, but that is probably more to do with how the banking sector is doing as a whole than to anything specific to UKIO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.