Jump to content

Sack the board.


Recommended Posts

Posted

On hold until Thursday...

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 885
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Star Lizard

    59

  • bawheed

    36

  • Bill Sikes

    32

  • kingantti1874

    22

Sasha Shulgin
Posted

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.

kingantti1874
Posted
12 minutes ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.


🤣 we’ve not really started using it yet. 

Percival King
Posted
37 minutes ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.

We're bottom of the league because of our pre-Critchley results and we probably won't have any analytics influenced signings until January, half way through the season. Arguably, because of our terrible start to the season, the club had to try something different and maybe using analytics is that something different. Regardless, if a club of our size got relegated over a 38 game season, the board should expect a lot of heat on them.

Posted

No matter the outcome of this season there needs to be major changes at board level. 

 

The decision makers have shown they have little to no idea what they are doing regarding the footballing side of the club. 

 

Wrong or bad decision time after time.

Sasha Shulgin
Posted
37 minutes ago, kingantti1874 said:


🤣 we’ve not really started using it yet. 


As you well know, given your numerous tantrums on the matter, we used it to hire a manager sacked by Blackpool and QPR.

 

 

Percival King
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mirror said:

No matter the outcome of this season there needs to be major changes at board level. 

 

The decision makers have shown they have little to no idea what they are doing regarding the footballing side of the club. 

 

Wrong or bad decision time after time.

So if the Critchley appointment turns out to be a success, most of the players signed in the summer deliver, we make good signings in January who also deliver then we need to make major changes to the board? Even if we win the Scottish Cup?

Posted
2 minutes ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

As you well know, given your numerous tantrums on the matter, we used it to hire a manager sacked by Blackpool and QPR.

 

And now it is your turn to have tantrums? :laugh:

 

Posted

:laugh: Great stuff.

RustyRightPeg
Posted
13 minutes ago, Sasha Shulgin said:


As you well know, given your numerous tantrums on the matter, we used it to hire a manager sacked by Blackpool and QPR.

 

 


You’re 3 weeks late with this pish mate. 

Nucky Thompson
Posted
1 hour ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.

We'll still finish miles above your mob.

We're the luckiest team in the World to have Hibs as our rivals :lol:

 

Italian Lambretta
Posted
1 hour ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.

Maybe it's time for the players to take some responsibility.

The charlatans are getting paid enough.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Percival King said:

So if the Critchley appointment turns out to be a success, most of the players signed in the summer deliver, we make good signings in January who also deliver then we need to make major changes to the board? Even if we win the Scottish Cup?

I must've dreamt last season where we strolled to third at a canter and the resultant european games and wins must be in my imagination....... 

RustyRightPeg
Posted
1 minute ago, Italian Lambretta said:

Maybe it's time for the players to take some responsibility.

The charlatans are getting paid enough.


Correct. Some of these players have outlasted 3 managers now. 
 

Similarities to Rangers are uncanny. Players thinking we’ll be here longer than you. 
 

Root the dressing room cancers out and start over. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, RustyRightPeg said:


Correct. Some of these players have outlasted 3 managers now. 
 

Similarities to Rangers are uncanny. Players thinking we’ll be here longer than you. 
 

Root the dressing room cancers out and start over. 

Does seem pretty clear now there are real issues with the players.

Shooter McGavin
Posted

They're not even subtle anymore 😄

Posted

After every point dropped we really should have a new "board oot" thread.

 

Highlights the vermin filth exceptionally well.

Posted
On 17/10/2024 at 12:37, Dazo said:


Aye it’s probably a fair point but it’s tough getting everything right all the time. As fans we look at things through a very narrow lens, if we’re winning not a lot else matters. There has definitely been a misalignment between the on and off field progress. Looking back over our history though it really isn’t a million miles away and ****ing light years away from what people make out. Hopefully we can now really kick on and the football side starts to show faster progress. On the face of it the board seem to be trying to do this. 

Yes but over 15 years the product on the park is up and down  Abysmal I would say ! Hearts seem to get  in a great position then boom here’s what you could have had and then regress it’s in our DNA 

Posted

We keep hearing that anyone incoming has to work within our structure. Given we are bottom of the league maybe the structure is the problem

Posted

No posts between the 23rd and now, fickle as feck us lot 😄

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Sherbet said:

We keep hearing that anyone incoming has to work within our structure. Given we are bottom of the league maybe the structure is the problem

Yes, let's give the Board a round of applause for their exemplary footballing decisions. The Board wouldn't know what a decent football club structure looks like. All for bringing on Bloom, but the board simply can't be blameless for Hearts falling to the bottom time & again. There is a definite lacking there.

Edited by hmfc1440
Posted
14 minutes ago, hmfc1440 said:

Yes, let's give the Board a round of applause for their exemplary footballing decisions. The Board wouldn't know what a decent football club structure looks like. All for bringing on Bloom, but the board simply can't be blameless for Hearts falling to the bottom time & again. There is a definite lacking there.

At least they are consistent

Jambo in Bathgate
Posted
On 17/10/2024 at 07:42, Dazo said:


Since fan ownership some of our fans have taken entitled status to a whole new level. Unfortunately they will never give the board a shred of praise without caveats. Since administration this board have made it clear the future of this club will never be put in jeopardy again. Through good and bad they have not wavered from that. It seems despite nearly losing our club that is not good enough for some fans. Even in the middle of our best league finishes and European league participation 2 out of the last 3 years we have a sack the board thread and every other thread infested with negativity about the board. Our stadium and infrastructure has never been as good. We appear to be on the verge of doing a deal that clubs all over Europe want to be part of. Right now our league position is not acceptable. Our board are trying to address that, still not good enough. Seriously lack of bigger picture thought process is pretty ripe and hibs wallopers keeps the negativity flowing. 

In lies the problem with fan ownership!  The danger of the FOH board being in conflict with the Club board. It’s important that people think carefully about the FOH election this year. We don’t want our dirty washing aired in full view of interlopers or the MSM. 
That would be disastrous for our club as there would be a breakdown in trust with our investors and benefactors. 

Posted

There would never be conflict between the FoH board and HMFC board if there was only one board. 

Jambo in Bathgate
Posted
2 hours ago, Nerja Jambo said:

There would never be conflict between the FoH board and HMFC board if there was only one board. 

Yes but that won’t be the case unless we sold our majority share. Fans running a club has not gone well at other such fan owned ventures! 

Posted
3 hours ago, Jambo in Bathgate said:

Yes but that won’t be the case unless we sold our majority share. Fans running a club has not gone well at other such fan owned ventures! 

Tell that to the Germans and the Spanish. They seem to be doing ok. Also why would we have to sell our majority share? That just doesn't make sense.

gordon simpson
Posted
1 hour ago, Nerja Jambo said:

Tell that to the Germans and the Spanish. They seem to be doing ok. Also why would we have to sell our majority share? That just doesn't make sense.

not much on kickback makes sense 

Posted
15 hours ago, Sasha Shulgin said:

They’re playing a dangerous game.

 

Appointing a manager and signing players based on the analytics is all well

and good.

 

Should this approach have us facing relegation, then it’ll be the board in the firing line.

 

It's a pre analytic approach squad and coaching team that has us facing relegation.

Pasquale for King
Posted

Are the board not fans? Just the right type.

Pasquale for King
Posted
1 hour ago, Nerja Jambo said:

Tell that to the Germans and the Spanish. They seem to be doing ok. Also why would we have to sell our majority share? That just doesn't make sense.

Indeed 

Posted
3 hours ago, Nerja Jambo said:

Tell that to the Germans and the Spanish. They seem to be doing ok. Also why would we have to sell our majority share? That just doesn't make sense.

German clubs have mute them one company and buses involved in running clubs as well. 

 

9 hours ago, Nerja Jambo said:

There would never be conflict between the FoH board and HMFC board if there was only one board. 

German football clubs have more than one entity and board involved in the ownership structure. 

  • 1 month later...
Sasha Shulgin
Posted
On 11/10/2024 at 17:29, Helter Skelter said:

Embarrassment after embarrassment after embarrassment when it comes to matters relating to the most important position within the club.

 

GTF.


Spot on.

SomethingAboutObua
Posted

Yes, anyone that voted for Naismith over Cifuentes needs to resign tbh. 

 

The Bloom deal needs done and Budge and board gone ASAP 

RustyRightPeg
Posted

Don’t see how they recover. How can they

Posted

Budge is a ****ing nightmare. 

McKinley is a ****ing nightmare.

The Hearts board are a ****ing nightmare. Penny pinching *****. 

 

Making Shankland pay for his kid to be mascot sums these ***** up. 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

how out of place do mckinley and budge look. its like they are from a bygone era and just wont leave. we need a fresh approach like wrexham. if you dont have the experience of leadership at least make up for it with finances

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...