Time wasting

[Mikey1874]

35 minutes ago, Ribble said:

 

It's not just about wasting time though, in games like saturday, disrupting the tempo of the game is every bit as important

 

Letting McKirdy get the ball did that. 

[maroonsgotop]

8 hours ago, Diadora Van Basten said:

I wish football would just get a clock that rums when the ball is in play and reduce the match time to sixty five minutes. 

been saying the same for ages. apart from disrupting the flow of the game there would be no so called advantage for all the nonsense like feigning injury etc

[skinnybob72]

What was the game a few years back where it started multi ball and when the home side scored someone went round with a bag and collected all the spare balls to totally slow the game down?

[Der Kaiser]

I have enjoyed the seethe of Hibs welts on twitter about us slowing the game down.

 

Down to 10 men and needing at least a  point. Did they honestly think we'd go for it and increase the chance of them taking the lead?

 

Ultimately rather than try be patient and pass through us they just hoofed it down the wings. Maybe if they'd slowed it down and thought about it a bit more they might have done something. But they didnt. Because Hibsing it is a much more natural feel for them.

 

[JFK-1]

I think pretty much any side at any level would have done the same thing in the circumstances. If the hubz think they would have done anything else if the situation were reversed they're even dumber than they look.

[jambo19]

Hibs aren't street smart about this though.

 

Hearts needed a point and were down to 10 men. What did hibs do most times we had possession? Take us down giving us another opportunity to waste time.

 

That's the game book when we have 11, disrupt our rhythm by taking one for the team but with 10 they surely want the ball in play for as long as possible - let us run given there's no support with a man down