Sawdust Caesar Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 That is an impressive bunker with all mod cons, doubt the grunts in the trenches would be happy seeing where their commander eats/sleeps etc compared to them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 Russia's only aircraft carrier is now 100% useless. It has been undergoing "upgrades" and "retrofits" for longer than anyone can remember without anything to show for it and now the crew have been pressed into the Marines and sent to the front lines in Ukraine. The ship was built in Ukraine before the USSR split up. Russia kept the one hull that was completed and Ukraine sold the other one to China. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trotter Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 1 hour ago, Cade said: Russia's only aircraft carrier is now 100% useless. It has been undergoing "upgrades" and "retrofits" for longer than anyone can remember without anything to show for it and now the crew have been pressed into the Marines and sent to the front lines in Ukraine. The ship was built in Ukraine before the USSR split up. Russia kept the one hull that was completed and Ukraine sold the other one to China. IIRC it was supposed to be converted into a floating casino, but that never happened. It's been in a lagoon for the last few years as a tourist attraction. Caught fire a few months ago as well. Teehee.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted September 30 Share Posted September 30 27 minutes ago, trotter said: IIRC it was supposed to be converted into a floating casino, but that never happened. It's been in a lagoon for the last few years as a tourist attraction. Caught fire a few months ago as well. Teehee.. That was the one the Chinese bought from Ukraine. They used some dodgy shell company out of Macau to buy it under the guise of converting it into a casino but NATO was like Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawdust Caesar Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 Russia allocating a third of their annual budget to the military to the detriment of health and education etc, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manaliveits105 Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 Russia conscript another 133000 - a year ago it was 130000 followed by another 150000 in the Spring - they seem quite serious . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 (edited) More "desperate" than serious. They're running out of money and they're running out of time. They need to try to secure some sort of victory before they totally collapse. Throwing endless meat waves at Ukrainian guns has resulted in modest territorial gains but at a vast cost in men and machines. No armed forces in the world can keep this rate of attrition up for very long. All of their old cold war storage depots are being emptied at astonishing rates and their new conscripts can barely even hold a gun. They're just hoping Trump wins in November and sells out to Putin. That's it. That's their strategy. Edited October 1 by Cade Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 A million dead Russian soldiers would certainly be remembered. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 Seems that Vuhledar has finally fallen. And all it took the Russians was two years of constant fighting, 800 destroyed armoured vehicles and tens of thousands of dead men. On to the next town, I guess. Well I say town. Pile of rubble is more accurate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennant's 6's Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 3 hours ago, Cade said: More "desperate" than serious. They're running out of money and they're running out of time. They need to try to secure some sort of victory before they totally collapse. Throwing endless meat waves at Ukrainian guns has resulted in modest territorial gains but at a vast cost in men and machines. No armed forces in the world can keep this rate of attrition up for very long. All of their old cold war storage depots are being emptied at astonishing rates and their new conscripts can barely even hold a gun. They're just hoping Trump wins in November and sells out to Putin. That's it. That's their strategy. Where are you getting this from? Not being critical but from the people that I listen to, former cia analysts/ former state dept officials, ex military, ex diplomats, independent journalists etc they say ukraine has lost well over 500k dead, plenty severly wounded, russia likley less than half that, no human waves but stand off artillery barrages & these massive glide bombs plus occassional unstoppable hypersonic kinzhal or iskander missiles. That their intention is the degradation of Ukraine/ NATO weapons and personnel, not territorial gains. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 1 minute ago, Tennant's 6's said: Where are you getting this from? Not being critical but from the people that I listen to, former cia analysts/ former state dept officials, ex military, ex diplomats, independent journalists etc they say ukraine has lost well over 500k dead, plenty severly wounded, russia likley less than half that, no human waves but stand off artillery barrages & these massive glide bombs plus occassional unstoppable hypersonic kinzhal or iskander missiles. That their intention is the degradation of Ukraine/ NATO weapons and personnel, not territorial gains. No chance that is right. You could post the links. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennant's 6's Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 4 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: No chance that is right. You could post the links. Sorry man, I'm looking through all my old youtube videos or bookmarked tweets. I guess you either believe bbc, cnn, nyt, wapo etc or not I have more faith in Col Laurence Wilkerson & Col Douglas MacGegor, Scott Ritter, Frm Amb Alistair Crooke & Chas Freeman, Ex CIA Analyst Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson, ex state dept official MATT Hoh, ex Swiss/ nato Jacques Baud etc etc None of us are there and propaganda thrives in the fog of war, it's what helps convince people to allow their taxes to be used to kill people instead of improve their own country's infrastructure Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 (edited) 56 minutes ago, Tennant's 6's said: Sorry man, I'm looking through all my old youtube videos or bookmarked tweets. I guess you either believe bbc, cnn, nyt, wapo etc or not I have more faith in Col Laurence Wilkerson & Col Douglas MacGegor, Scott Ritter, Frm Amb Alistair Crooke & Chas Freeman, Ex CIA Analyst Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson, ex state dept official MATT Hoh, ex Swiss/ nato Jacques Baud etc etc None of us are there and propaganda thrives in the fog of war, it's what helps convince people to allow their taxes to be used to kill people instead of improve their own country's infrastructure For Russian and Ukranian losses look at Andrew Perpetua's daily reports and the accumulated estimates. Perpetua's losses are each confirmed by video evidence, usually from Russian sources. He only covers veheicles and equipment but regularly throughout the war Russian losses have been around 3 times that of Ukranians I don't know of any reliable statistical source that says the reverse Just as an example here are the stats he posted today Each of these has a video link, mapped, to show the event and he has a team of volunteers wading through the online video evidence and mapping evidence to verify these. He doesn't do troop losses but clearly they are likely to be similar proportionately to the equipment losses, perhaps even worse for the Russians as they appear to be using meat grinder tactics of throwing men towards trenches and defensive positions, which always results in more losses for the attacking side. I'd like to see any real evidence to contradict this Edited October 1 by scott herbertson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tennant's 6's Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 6 minutes ago, scott herbertson said: For Russian and Ukranian losses look at Andrew Perpetua's daily reports and the accumulated estimates. Perpetua's losses are each confirmed by video evidence, usually from Russian sources. He only covers veheicles and equipment but regularly throughout the war Russian losses have been around 3 times that of Ukranians I don't know of any reliable statistical source that says the reverse Just as an example here are the stats he posted today Each of these has a video link, mapped, to show the event and he has a team of volunteers wading through the online video evidence and mapping evidence to verify these. He doesn't do troop losses but clearly they are likely to be similar proportionately to the equipment losses, perhaps even worse for the Russians as they appear to be using meat grinder tactics of throwing men towards trenches and defensive positions, which always results in more losses for the attacking side. I'd like to see any real evidence to contradict this Never heard of him so I'll check it out, contradicts the analysts that i listen to, including Professors Sachs, Meirsheimer, Doctorow but I'll look into this source when i have the time 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 8 minutes ago, Tennant's 6's said: Never heard of him so I'll check it out, contradicts the analysts that i listen to, including Professors Sachs, Meirsheimer, Doctorow but I'll look into this source when i have the time 👍 You have quoted at least one Russian supporting person alongside US sources. I do think you make a fair point that pro Ukrainian sources aren't talking about Ukrainian losses which must be severe. But we can take the overall pattern of the war as a decent indication. So if there are 600,000 Ukrainian armed forces deaths, Russian deaths must be at least 2 million. Which we pretty much know can't be true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 1 hour ago, Tennant's 6's said: Sorry man, I'm looking through all my old youtube videos or bookmarked tweets. I guess you either believe bbc, cnn, nyt, wapo etc or not I have more faith in Col Laurence Wilkerson & Col Douglas MacGegor, Scott Ritter, Frm Amb Alistair Crooke & Chas Freeman, Ex CIA Analyst Ray McGovern, Larry Johnson, ex state dept official MATT Hoh, ex Swiss/ nato Jacques Baud etc etc None of us are there and propaganda thrives in the fog of war, it's what helps convince people to allow their taxes to be used to kill people instead of improve their own country's infrastructure McGregor? The guy who was paid by the Russians to call for the annexation of Ukrainian territory in 2014? And in 2022, paid again to say Russia would finish Ukraine off in 15 days? Ritter? The convicted sex offender? The one who said the Ukrainians were like rabid dogs? The one who said Ukraine was responsible for the Bucha massacre and that President Biden was a war criminal? McGovern? Hoh? The guys who told us more than once that Russia had defeated Ukraine? Larry Johnson? The guy who once tried to claim that Michelle Obama used anti-white racist slurs and claimed that the reason he had no evidence was because the McCain campaign stopped him from using the tapes? Is he also the one who at the start of 2023 said the West were using Ukraine for a proxy war against Russia, and only giving them enough weapons for six months, even though Russian air defences were superior to anything in the West? Jacques Baud? Another one who tried to blame Ukraine (and Britain) for the Bucha massacre? The one who said the Mafia were probably responsible for killing Alexei Navalny? The one who said the Skripals weren't poisoned by the Russians, but actually had food poisoning? Yeah well OK then. 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 19 minutes ago, Tennant's 6's said: Never heard of him so I'll check it out, contradicts the analysts that i listen to, including Professors Sachs, Meirsheimer, Doctorow but I'll look into this source when i have the time 👍 Ah here, do I have to look up this lot as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John mcCartney Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 I have more faith in Col Laurence Wilkerson & Col Douglas MacGegor, Scott Ritter, https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/15hda2w/why_did_douglas_macgregor_go_insane/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueRiver Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 2 hours ago, Ulysses said: McGregor? The guy who was paid by the Russians to call for the annexation of Ukrainian territory in 2014? And in 2022, paid again to say Russia would finish Ukraine off in 15 days? Ritter? The convicted sex offender? The one who said the Ukrainians were like rabid dogs? The one who said Ukraine was responsible for the Bucha massacre and that President Biden was a war criminal? McGovern? Hoh? The guys who told us more than once that Russia had defeated Ukraine? Larry Johnson? The guy who once tried to claim that Michelle Obama used anti-white racist slurs and claimed that the reason he had no evidence was because the McCain campaign stopped him from using the tapes? Is he also the one who at the start of 2023 said the West were using Ukraine for a proxy war against Russia, and only giving them enough weapons for six months, even though Russian air defences were superior to anything in the West? Jacques Baud? Another one who tried to blame Ukraine (and Britain) for the Bucha massacre? The one who said the Mafia were probably responsible for killing Alexei Navalny? The one who said the Skripals weren't poisoned by the Russians, but actually had food poisoning? Yeah well OK then. 🤷♂️ You've more energy than me for this at times Uly but well played. An absolute pantheon of utter melts and screwballs being granted a veneer of respectability due to previous roles they held. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueRiver Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 2 hours ago, Ulysses said: Ah here, do I have to look up this lot as well? Meirsheimer felt that a nuclear deterrent was required in Europe after the US is gone because Germany would try and conquer the continent... Fud. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted October 1 Share Posted October 1 47 minutes ago, BlueRiver said: You've more energy than me for this at times Uly but well played. An absolute pantheon of utter melts and screwballs being granted a veneer of respectability due to previous roles they held. Yep, and it never ceases to bemuse me why some people like to believe some of this stuff for no other reason than that it's a bit different and presented in an entertaining fashion, usually on video. 44 minutes ago, BlueRiver said: Meirsheimer felt that a nuclear deterrent was required in Europe after the US is gone because Germany would try and conquer the continent... Fud. In that case I'm not going to waste my time checking out the others. 2 hours ago, John mcCartney said: I have more faith in Col Laurence Wilkerson & Col Douglas MacGegor, Scott Ritter, https://www.reddit.com/r/LessCredibleDefence/comments/15hda2w/why_did_douglas_macgregor_go_insane/ Well spotted. Some interesting points in that discussion about why people who are undoubtedly smart go off the deep end on some issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 56 minutes ago, Ulysses said: Yep, and it never ceases to bemuse me why some people like to believe some of this stuff for no other reason than that it's a bit different and presented in an entertaining fashion, usually on video. Because they think they’re smarter than you, going to ‘credible’ sources rather than the dumb MSM you go to. Facebook is the smartest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 28 minutes ago, JFK-1 said: Because they think they’re smarter than you, going to ‘credible’ sources rather than the dumb MSM you go to. Facebook is the smartest. I know. They say I should do my own research. But when I do my own research, guess what I find out? Stuff like this. I find out stuff like this. 4 hours ago, Ulysses said: McGregor? The guy who was paid by the Russians to call for the annexation of Ukrainian territory in 2014? And in 2022, paid again to say Russia would finish Ukraine off in 15 days? Ritter? The convicted sex offender? The one who said the Ukrainians were like rabid dogs? The one who said Ukraine was responsible for the Bucha massacre and that President Biden was a war criminal? McGovern? Hoh? The guys who told us more than once that Russia had defeated Ukraine? Larry Johnson? The guy who once tried to claim that Michelle Obama used anti-white racist slurs and claimed that the reason he had no evidence was because the McCain campaign stopped him from using the tapes? Is he also the one who at the start of 2023 said the West were using Ukraine for a proxy war against Russia, and only giving them enough weapons for six months, even though Russian air defences were superior to anything in the West? Jacques Baud? Another one who tried to blame Ukraine (and Britain) for the Bucha massacre? The one who said the Mafia were probably responsible for killing Alexei Navalny? The one who said the Skripals weren't poisoned by the Russians, but actually had food poisoning? Yeah well OK then. 🤷♂️ Sheesh. 🤷♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFK-1 Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 5 hours ago, Ulysses said: I know. They say I should do my own research. But when I do my own research, guess what I find out? Stuff like this. I find out stuff like this. Sheesh. 🤷♂️ I like the irony of being told to do your own research by someone who has clearly done no research. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cade Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 For materiel losses, there are several tracking sites which use documented photographs or video evidence of destroyed vehicles and other military equipment. https://ukr.warspotting.net/ https://www.oryxspioenkop.com/2022/02/attack-on-europe-documenting-equipment.html For Russian storage depletion there are several companies which offer satellite imagery to the public. Maxar provide all their images to the public for free, so you can go look at the images yourself. For Russian personnel losses, we used to be able to get information from the Russian government about compensation payments made to wounded soldiers and the families of dead ones, but they stopped giving out that information a while back (hmmmm I wonder why). Analysts reckon that 1.5% of Russia's GDP is being spent on these compensation payments alone, which reveals the scale of the dead and seriously wounded. However, the scale many be even larger as there are many stories which have been circulating that the Russian army has been changing the rules on qualification for these compensation payments. For example they are listing people as "missing" instead of "killed in action" so no compo for the families, or stating that your injury was as a result of you or your unit's negligence so no compo for your injury, things like that. Basic pay for soldiers has risen sharply because they were running out of volunteers and even foreign mercenaries. New recruits now get 1.9million roubles as a signing on fee (just under $22,000) with an annual salary of 5.2million roubles (just under $60,000). This points to a manpower shortage. Wages for factory workers have shot up sharply too, with factories all churning out as much military gear as possible 24 hours a day. They've gone from an average of 53,000 roubles a month in 2022 up to 85,000 a month in 2024, an increase of 60%. This also points to heavy equipment losses. Inflation in Russia is running at 9.1%. Interest rates are at an eye watering 19%. Putin has signed countless presidential decrees banning the movement of roubles out of the country, forcibly nationalising many industries, seizing foreign owned business assets and banning the trading of Euros and Dollars at the stock exchange. He's obsessed with keeping the dollar/rouble exchange rate below 100 roubles to the dollar. That appears to be his red line. Of course, that's only the official exchange rate. When you actually trade dollars and roubles there, it costs you 200 roubles to buy 1 dollar and you only get 50 roubles when selling dollars. 6.4% of GDP is going on military expenses this year, but a good chunk of that is for wages and compensation instead of equipment. That's 32% of all government spending. Their economy is burning up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Deeds Posted Monday at 18:12 Share Posted Monday at 18:12 I know that we've read similar reports before but always good to read about the perilous state of the Russian economy https://fortune.com/2024/10/06/russia-economy-outlook-ukraine-war-budget-deficit-military-spending-sanctions/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawdust Caesar Posted Tuesday at 14:35 Share Posted Tuesday at 14:35 Unconfirmed reports that Igor Girkin died in prison yesterday. If true a nice little birthday present for Vlad. And one less piece of scum on the planet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted Tuesday at 15:36 Share Posted Tuesday at 15:36 56 minutes ago, Sawdust Caesar said: Unconfirmed reports that Igor Girkin died in prison yesterday. If true a nice little birthday present for Vlad. And one less piece of scum on the planet. As a reminder for those not aware, Igor Girkin was a leader of the pro Russian separatists who started the war in Eastern Ukraine in 2014. He was also involved in the shooting down of the Malaysian airline for which he was convicted. Like many of the Russians he ended up criticising the war effort for incompetence. So a familiar ending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertarian Posted Tuesday at 21:12 Share Posted Tuesday at 21:12 On 01/10/2024 at 23:47, BlueRiver said: Meirsheimer felt that a nuclear deterrent was required in Europe after the US is gone because Germany would try and conquer the continent... Fud. Mearsheimer has never claimed that Russia will try and conquer Europe. You made that up. Also the last time I looked both France and Britain are nuclear powers. The Russians are winning the war in Ukraine and there's nothing that the West can do anything about it. Despite wishful thinking by many in the West Ukraine is losing the war and the only question now will be what terms the Russians will demand and will the West accept them. If the West refuses to accept then Ukraine is likely to be wiped off the map. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted Tuesday at 21:30 Share Posted Tuesday at 21:30 Come on, own up, which one of you uttered Libertarian's name three times? An interval of silliness, unwillingness to see the truth, and support for Ivan's barbarism and expansion now awaits, and if I find out which one of you did it... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ｕｎｋｎｏｗｎｕｓｅｒ Posted Wednesday at 00:42 Share Posted Wednesday at 00:42 On 01/10/2024 at 23:47, BlueRiver said: Meirsheimer felt that a nuclear deterrent was required in Europe after the US is gone because Germany would try and conquer the continent... 3 hours ago, Libertarian said: Mearsheimer has never claimed that Russia will try and conquer Europe. You made that up. Somebody's certainly making something up! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis Reynolds Posted Wednesday at 06:19 Share Posted Wednesday at 06:19 🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueRiver Posted Wednesday at 09:03 Share Posted Wednesday at 09:03 (edited) 11 hours ago, Libertarian said: Mearsheimer has never claimed that Russia will try and conquer Europe. You made that up. Also the last time I looked both France and Britain are nuclear powers. The Russians are winning the war in Ukraine and there's nothing that the West can do anything about it. Despite wishful thinking by many in the West Ukraine is losing the war and the only question now will be what terms the Russians will demand and will the West accept them. If the West refuses to accept then Ukraine is likely to be wiped off the map. I said Germany. He wouldn't say Russia because his tongue is that far up their crack he makes stuff up to blame the West for Russia's aggression towards Ukraine. In fact you two are probably french kissing up Putin's ring. Edited Wednesday at 09:04 by BlueRiver Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueRiver Posted Wednesday at 09:26 Share Posted Wednesday at 09:26 Russia has lost hundreds of thousands of men, vast amounts of military hardware, a large portion of its Black Sea fleet, doubled its border length with NATO, and pretty much wiped out a generation. So much winning. Even if there's a peace agreement that the Eastern part of Ukraine is ceded to Russia the time it'll take for them to recover from their "victory" will be decades. I reckon the West will be quite happy that they've decided to blow their own cock off entirely of their own accord. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sawdust Caesar Posted Wednesday at 12:15 Share Posted Wednesday at 12:15 I'd love to know why a libertarian is so enthralled by an authoritarian. Libertarianism is defined as the belief that personal freedom should be maximised, while authoritarianism is defined as the belief that authority should be obeyed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig_ Posted Wednesday at 12:44 Share Posted Wednesday at 12:44 27 minutes ago, Sawdust Caesar said: I'd love to know why a libertarian is so enthralled by an authoritarian. Libertarianism is defined as the belief that personal freedom should be maximised, while authoritarianism is defined as the belief that authority should be obeyed. Seems to be a common thread amongst these so-called libertarians. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted Wednesday at 16:45 Share Posted Wednesday at 16:45 3 hours ago, Craig_ said: Seems to be a common thread amongst these so-called libertarians. Because they've accidentally misspelled the word. It should actually be "libbertarian". Vegetarian - wants to eat vegetables. Pescatarian - wants to eat fish. Libbertarian - wants to eat libbers. Just a thought. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.