Jump to content

James Webb Space Telescope


JFK-1

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Pap said:

I wonder how many times they wiped the lens with cotton wool before it was packed to go 🙃

To get the best result you have breath on it first. Hope they did that too 😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cade said:

Everything deployed.

 

All the major infrastructure is done.

 

Now it has to be calibrated, cooled and tested.

 

It's an astonishing scientific feat.  Among the greatest in history.

 

Even the ability to figure out where L2 is ... a spot in space where all the gravitational forces cancel each other out ... blows my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Maple Leaf said:

 

It's an astonishing scientific feat.  Among the greatest in history.

 

Even the ability to figure out where L2 is ... a spot in space where all the gravitational forces cancel each other out ... blows my mind.

 

Not only to determine where L2 is, but to essentially go into orbit around that point rather than sit at the point. The mind boggles at the complexity of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/01/2022 at 15:56, redjambo said:

 

Not only to determine where L2 is, but to essentially go into orbit around that point rather than sit at the point. The mind boggles at the complexity of it.

 

How mind blowing is it that the guy who calculated the points did it in the 1700's? And that's nothing in comparison to what Newton did in the 1600's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little update on the progress of Webb. The telescope is as I post around 770,000 miles from Earth with around 128,000 miles to go before reaching the L2 parking point.

About 15 days to go the telescope speed is now down to about 676 mph and slowing by the day. I think the launch may have been calculated to push it almost there but not quite. Looking like it may come to a halt just short of L2 and might need a very small nudge into final position.

This project has brought massive credit not just to NASA but ESA and the Ariane team. ESA established themselves as the current go to for highly complex launches carrying massively expensive payloads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst

Making good progress towards L2. 94%+ there, 48,000 miles or 78,000k to go.  L2 insertion could happen on Sunday.

 

The individual mirror segments all appear to have been deployed, just the months of fine adjustment and focusing to follow.  Temperatures also dropping on the "cold side".

 

https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/whereIsWebb.html?units=english

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two of the mirror hexes have got slightly dodgy sensors, so those two need extra special aligning.

This problem was spotted after the satellite was built and the cost (in both time and money) to take it all apart again to fix those parts was deemed not worth it.

The boffins have worked out how to compensate for the lack of sensors and will align those two hexes after all the others have been zeroed in.

The sensors will be unable to tell the exact position of those two parts, but running tests when all the others are aligned will tell them how much to move these two by to bring it all info sharp focus.

 

"Boss! These two things are buggered."
"FFS we're twenty years and hundreds of millions over budget already, just launch the fecker and we'll come up with a solution later"

"sound, nae bother"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jambo_jim2001

Will need it shortly,to see the gap to Hibs😁looking forward to the images this is going to produce tho...was amazed at Hubble images,,this should blow those out the water

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The speed of the telescope is currently down to around 523mph, passenger jet speed and slowing by the day. A distance of 43,700 miles still to go 9 days till insertion.

I believe it's going to trundle to a stop just short of the L2 point then be nudged into position using some of the fuel. If that be the case it will be fascinating to see exactly how short of the point it stops. What a calculation btw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
3 hours ago, JFK-1 said:

The speed of the telescope is currently down to around 523mph, passenger jet speed and slowing by the day. A distance of 43,700 miles still to go 9 days till insertion.

I believe it's going to trundle to a stop just short of the L2 point then be nudged into position using some of the fuel. If that be the case it will be fascinating to see exactly how short of the point it stops. What a calculation btw.

The telescope is now 26 days into the mission so, according to the schedule, only 3 days away from the L2 insertion (Launch +29). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

The telescope is now 26 days into the mission so, according to the schedule, only 3 days away from the L2 insertion (Launch +29). 

 

Yes I was misreading it as the 29th.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It appears to be still cruising at around 450mph orbiting the L2 point. I will hazard a guess around that speed was planned.

Trying to envisage what might happen if it were to be going faster than that, might exit the point area I suppose since something going around the Earth too fast would escape rather than orbit.

 

Or too slow, fall into the point? Envisaging it as some sort of gravity well, like a crater on the earth say. Water or anything else would fall into it. And anything going below orbital velocity around Earth is going to "fall in"

But have no idea if that's a fit analogy for the scenario.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
1 hour ago, JFK-1 said:

It appears to be still cruising at around 450mph orbiting the L2 point. I will hazard a guess around that speed was planned.

Trying to envisage what might happen if it were to be going faster than that, might exit the point area I suppose since something going around the Earth too fast would escape rather than orbit.

 

Or too slow, fall into the point? Envisaging it as some sort of gravity well, like a crater on the earth say. Water or anything else would fall into it. And anything going below orbital velocity around Earth is going to "fall in"

But have no idea if that's a fit analogy for the scenario.

Its orbit of L2  (at a distance of 232,000 miles) is roughly the same as the moon's orbit (average distance 239,000 miles) round the earth.  The moon takes around 27 days to orbit the earth. JWST will take 6 months to orbit L2.  It's all a balancing act of gravitational pulls between the Earth, Moon and Sun.

 

The 450mph will be relative to L2. The moon travels round the Earth at 2,288mph, so the JWST velocity over a similar distance appears to be in the ball park.   JWST will also travel round the Sun in a year as it keeps it's alignment with the Earth. Relative to the Sun, the Earth orbits at 67,000 mph.

 

I think that Earth orbit is around 17,500mph (first manned space craft) and escape velocity is around 25,000mph (first moon trips)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Footballfirst said:

Its orbit of L2  (at a distance of 232,000 miles) is roughly the same as the moon's orbit (average distance 239,000 miles) round the earth.  The moon takes around 27 days to orbit the earth. JWST will take 6 months to orbit L2.  It's all a balancing act of gravitational pulls between the Earth, Moon and Sun.

 

The 450mph will be relative to L2. The moon travels round the Earth at 2,288mph, so the JWST velocity over a similar distance appears to be in the ball park.   JWST will also travel round the Sun in a year as it keeps it's alignment with the Earth. Relative to the Sun, the Earth orbits at 67,000 mph.

 

I think that Earth orbit is around 17,500mph (first manned space craft) and escape velocity is around 25,000mph (first moon trips)

 

I see logic in your calculations, and they gave me a further thought. The Lagrange points may shift as the moon recedes further from the Earth.

Apparently the moon was only around 10,000 miles or so away from the Earth at first, that must have been quite a sky spectacle, and has been drifting further out ever since. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WebbCirclingLangrangePoint2_1024.gif

 

Big orange dot is the Sun, wee blue doe in the middle is Earth.

 

This helps you visualise the path that JWST is going to be on for the next twenty years, orbiting a gravitational point in space but still orbiting the sun.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst
1 hour ago, Cade said:

WebbCirclingLangrangePoint2_1024.gif

 

Big orange dot is the Sun, wee blue doe in the middle is Earth.

 

This helps you visualise the path that JWST is going to be on for the next twenty years, orbiting a gravitational point in space but still orbiting the sun.

 

Here's a better illustration that incorporates the graphic above.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow - that's some seriously complex  physics, maths, engineering, electronics and robotics expertise required to get this stage working right.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Footballfirst said:

Here's a better illustration that incorporates the graphic above.

 

 

 

Didn't realise how big it was after it unfolded itself

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Footballfirst

JWST's first image (a selfie).

 

The bright segment is the light reflecting from the star that is being used to calibrate the mirrors.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

In this image you can see galaxies in the background, the star is around 2,000 light years away, the galaxies probably billions of light years. Yet if you expand it you can clearly see features of the galaxies, and the telescope isn't even focused on them. It's going to be amazing when it does lock in on a galaxy.

_123733622_1f935b99-c9fd-4c8c-b4c5-0de85

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Footballfirst

NASA has just published a pair of images comparing the performance of their first infrared space telescope, Spitzer, and the James Webb telescope. Prospects of a lot more to come once the "science" actually starts.

 

Computer, enhance! Compare the same target — seen by Spitzer & in Webb’s calibration images. Spitzer, NASA's first infrared Great Observatory, led the way for Webb’s larger primary mirror & improved detectors to see the infrared sky with even more clarity: https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/09/miris-sharper-view-hints-at-new-possibilities-for-science/
 
A side-by-side comparison of the same view of part of the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, as seen in infrared by Spitzer's IRAC instrument on the left versus Webb's MIRI instrument on the right. Both images are colorized red. Webb's image shows much clearer detail, depicting crisper stars and clouds of gas.
 
Edited by Footballfirst
Link to comment
Share on other sites

PortyJambo
5 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

NASA has just published a pair of images comparing the performance of their first infrared space telescope, Spitzer, and the James Webb telescope. Prospects of a lot more to come once the "science" actually starts.

 

Computer, enhance! Compare the same target — seen by Spitzer & in Webb’s calibration images. Spitzer, NASA's first infrared Great Observatory, led the way for Webb’s larger primary mirror & improved detectors to see the infrared sky with even more clarity: https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/09/miris-sharper-view-hints-at-new-possibilities-for-science/
 
A side-by-side comparison of the same view of part of the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, as seen in infrared by Spitzer's IRAC instrument on the left versus Webb's MIRI instrument on the right. Both images are colorized red. Webb's image shows much clearer detail, depicting crisper stars and clouds of gas.
 

Pretty spectacular difference in resolution. Can't wait to see the images coming through when they start using it "for real"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jambo-Jimbo
1 hour ago, Footballfirst said:

NASA has just published a pair of images comparing the performance of their first infrared space telescope, Spitzer, and the James Webb telescope. Prospects of a lot more to come once the "science" actually starts.

 

Computer, enhance! Compare the same target — seen by Spitzer & in Webb’s calibration images. Spitzer, NASA's first infrared Great Observatory, led the way for Webb’s larger primary mirror & improved detectors to see the infrared sky with even more clarity: https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/09/miris-sharper-view-hints-at-new-possibilities-for-science/
 
A side-by-side comparison of the same view of part of the Large Magellanic Cloud, a small satellite galaxy of the Milky Way, as seen in infrared by Spitzer's IRAC instrument on the left versus Webb's MIRI instrument on the right. Both images are colorized red. Webb's image shows much clearer detail, depicting crisper stars and clouds of gas.
 

 

Wow, what an improvement, really impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unknown user
On 29/01/2022 at 02:47, JFK-1 said:

This is the best visualisation I have seen demonstrating how we think Einsteinian gravity works.
 

 

 

See also this, on gravitational waves

 

 

Edited by Smithee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unknown user

Not sure if I've posted this before but I love this guy, Dustin from Smarter Every Day.

 

His dad worked on the solar shield of the JWT for years, this is an interview where we get to see up close and personal as Dustin interviews his own dad and other experts.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Smithee said:

 

See also this, on gravitational waves

 

 

 

Thanks for posting that. Fascinating. The guy's excellent at explaining things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unknown user
40 minutes ago, redjambo said:

 

Thanks for posting that. Fascinating. The guy's excellent at explaining things.

 

He really is, I love him, I kind of understand things way beyond my natural ability thanks to him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
Footballfirst

NASA must be very happy with the quality of the images being received during commissioning to provide a firm date this far out.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Footballfirst said:

NASA must be very happy with the quality of the images being received during commissioning to provide a firm date this far out.

 

 

Sorry, Scotland will be too busy tooting fluting and banging a big Drum .

Edited by ri Alban
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...