milky_26 Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 according to a judge pringles are not potato crisps http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7490346.stm the good thing about this is that they should now become cheaper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamboy81 Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 50% Potato? Whats the other 50% like? I prefer the McCoys specials anyway. The big Nacho cheese and sour creme bag, its the daddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milky_26 Posted July 4, 2008 Author Share Posted July 4, 2008 that is a point what is the other 50%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovecraft Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Smack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milky_26 Posted July 4, 2008 Author Share Posted July 4, 2008 Smack no wonder they are so addictive:dribble: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 But he said that Pringles did not meet these criteria - being made from potato flour, corn flour, wheat starch and rice flour together with fat and emulsifier, salt and seasoning, with a potato content of about 42%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lovecraft Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 no wonder they are so addictive:dribble: That will be due to the fact they are made by Proctor & Gamble, a huge Pharmaceutical company. They are designed to be addictive. Once you pop, you can't stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taffin Posted July 4, 2008 Share Posted July 4, 2008 Surely there is no such thing as a potato crisp. Is it not a potato chip in Americaland and just a plain old crisp here? Or is this some kind of fangled in between term? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4,663
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.