Eno Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Just now, CostaJambo said: That's what I thought too. Totally baffling how he got away with it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
viva hate Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Just now, Swanny17 said: Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bajthejambo Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 He looks as though he follows the same diet as Danny Swanson. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozzyonthefence Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 If he doesn’t get a 3 game ban (it is 3 for violent conduct isn’t it?) we might as well give up with this Compliance Officer malarkey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stirlingshirejambo Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 49 minutes ago, Gashauskis9 said: Irony is he’ll get banned against a team we need Hibs to beat. Retrospective bans are a waste of time imo. The team that suffered as a result don’t get the benefit of it. We don’t need Hibs to beat anybody for us. It’s in our own hands Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadj Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 50 minutes ago, Cruickshank for Scotland said: McNulty has always been a bit of a thug - more so on a Hibs shirt! Thought the lines man had a clear view of the stamp! No he was looking at the penalty box for some reason. Even .net says he is getting a ban Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 19 minutes ago, Fozzyonthefence said: If he doesn’t get a 3 game ban (it is 3 for violent conduct isn’t it?) we might as well give up with this Compliance Officer malarkey. 2 games in Scotland (it's 3 in England) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frank Sidebottom Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Maybe he can use his upcoming free weekends to lose some of the timber he is carrying, little rat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikoliunas Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 He's ment to be Hibs daft, if I was his age and Hibs daft I'd want to kill hearts for what they've done to my short shit life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pablo Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 1 hour ago, GinRummy said: Wee hibs dick. He’ll be hurting more than most tonight. Enjoy the ban . Absolutely. His motivation was that it was a hertz cant he would stamp on. His schemie tramp mates would have helped him dine out on it forever. Instead he got fecked tonight. Did next to nothing, and looked every bit the hibs loser in life that he is. Skinny fat with a ten pound haircut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zico Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 Probably not a bad thing as they’d have just sat in so would’ve only taken several inches of the Jambo boaby rather than the full length. Allan on the other hand... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sadj Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 44 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Such a misleading headline , he never once says he stamped on him. He makes it clear his opinion without saying it though. Whats the inference? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 29 minutes ago, sadj said: Such a misleading headline , he never once says he stamped on him. He makes it clear his opinion without saying it though. Whats the inference? "I felt like it was a stamp at the time" Also https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport/football/hearts/hearts-sean-clare-told-referee-he-felt-stamp-hibs-marc-mcnulty-2057188%3famp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 McNulty is a little ****ing rat. Genuinely Riordan/Griffiths level of scum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WheatfieldWarrior Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/football/51730630 BBC Running this - the appeals panel made the sfa look even more ridiculous than usual the other week, so imagine they'll nail him to the wall over this. Edited March 4, 2020 by WheatfieldWarrior Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Findlay Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 It's a Red card everyday of the week. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alicante jambo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Red card 100% but come on. How have the officials no seen this? Blatant as can be ffs. Mcnulty will get a 3 game ban hopefully. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nookie Bear Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 8 hours ago, kingantti1874 said: He’s absolutely shit Spot on. Commentators were pushing him for a Scotland place when he was scoring 3 past an amateur team in the Cup. It’s like us calling for Zeefuik to get a game for Holland after his hat trick against Cowdenbeath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
It should have been ten Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Was like they were playing with 10 men anyway, the dirty wee prick was non existent! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Internet Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 His right foot touched Clare's back more often than it touched the baw. If this hadn't happened and someone told me he wasn't playing I'd believe it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyCant Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) 8 hours ago, stirlingshirejambo said: We don’t need Hibs to beat anybody for us. It’s in our own hands True if you think we will win 6 or 7 games between now and the end. Personally I’d rather have the insurance of our relegation rivals getting beat whoever they are playing, and that includes Hibs Edited March 4, 2020 by JimmyCant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxfee Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 A sending off early in a game can sometimes go against you. Hibs were rubbish and had no spirit so a red may have triggered them a wee bit. On this, happy for him to get a ban after we’d smashed them on the pitch!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2 Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 10 hours ago, Gashauskis9 said: Irony is he’ll get banned against a team we need Hibs to beat. Retrospective bans are a waste of time imo. The team that suffered as a result don’t get the benefit of it. Unless of course the ban is in force for the semi! But I agree, perhaps it should be sending offs ban you from playing against the team you were sent off against, or that team gets to choose which games you are banned for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ford donald Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 10 hours ago, Cruickshank for Scotland said: Retrospective ban or blanked? Should have been a straight red,intentional stamp,shocking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcjambo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 10 hours ago, graham said: He’s a huge Celtic fan. Same thing though given the love in between them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calebs Grandad Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Riordan Stokes O’Connor McNulty Hibs Hall of Shame candidate? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Such a cowardly thing to do and sums the odious fat prick up. How Clancy didn’t red card him or even yellow card him is a complete mystery as he knows the cameras are at the game and that it will be looked at from all angles and every pundit will have an opinion, he just makes himself out to be either a cheat or grossly incompetent. What can his excuse be for not giving it, given he was staring at it and was close enough to see it for exactly what it was? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brick Tamland Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Just now, Calebs Grandad said: Riordan Stokes O’Connor McNulty Hibs Hall of Greats candidate? FTFY - it is Hibs after all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calebs Grandad Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 5 minutes ago, Brick Tamland said: FTFY - it is Hibs after all. 😂👍 hero worshipped by the methadone crew Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calebs Grandad Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 7 minutes ago, Brick Tamland said: Such a cowardly thing to do and sums the odious fat prick up. How Clancy didn’t red card him or even yellow card him is a complete mystery as he knows the cameras are at the game and that it will be looked at from all angles and every pundit will have an opinion, he just makes himself out to be either a cheat or grossly incompetent. What can his excuse be for not giving it, given he was staring at it and was close enough to see it for exactly what it was? An extremely well worded summing up that becomes a work of art with the ‘odious fat prick’ addition! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 He should receive more than a 2 game ban for that. That was an act of a coward. What pocesses a human being (yes I know), to deliberately stamp on another's spine?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pans Jambo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Seems to be plenty of media attention given to this. I would be amazed if the compliance officer doesn't take a look at this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnthomas Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 2 hours ago, alicante jambo said: Red card 100% but come on. How have the officials no seen this? Blatant as can be ffs. Mcnulty will get a 3 game ban hopefully. What ban will Clancy get ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Des Lynam Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Was he playing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alicante jambo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 hour ago, johnthomas said: What ban will Clancy get ? Mate no got a clue. But i would ban all the top refs they are getting worse. 1000 plus pound per game ffs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
haj Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) As we have seen several times previously, the extent of the retrospective action is dictated not by the action itself but by the media attention and reaction it receives. This has already become too high a profile incident to be ignored and will be punished accordingly. The fact a top flight referee watched a professional player stand on the back of another and did nothing will be swept under the carpet as it will the next time and the next and the next. Edited March 4, 2020 by haj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavydavy Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 11 hours ago, Pans Jambo said: Ref should get banned for not seeing it at the time & whilst we are at it, why was Scott Allan’s blatant hand ball in the box for the penalty not a 2nd yellow??? That's what I though then I heard the BT Ref saying that giving away the penalty was sufficient and no need for a second yellow. That is a stupid rule. So if he deliberately handles the ball outside the box it's a booking but because he gives away the penalty that is seen as sufficient punishment. So that actually encourages players to commit fouls in the box without fear of being sent of. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Jersey_HMFC Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Not even shown on the BBC highlights In fact, their "highlights" are literally just the goals... it might be that they just wanted to upload the goals soon and will upload extended highlights once they have had chance to edit, but I am sceptical! meanwhile the highlights of gerrard's win at CP were about 10 minutes long Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Roller Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Fat coward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmiyaHearts Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 42 minutes ago, H2 said: Unless of course the ban is in force for the semi! But I agree, perhaps it should be sending offs ban you from playing against the team you were sent off against, or that team gets to choose which games you are banned for. More than happy for this waste of skin to be available for the semi final. The stamp was the only thing he done last night, and it wasn't even on the pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midloth_Iain Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 6 minutes ago, Steve_Jersey_HMFC said: Not even shown on the BBC highlights In fact, their "highlights" are literally just the goals... it might be that they just wanted to upload the goals soon and will upload extended highlights once they have had chance to edit, but I am sceptical! meanwhile the highlights of gerrard's win at CP were about 10 minutes long the 'extended' highlights appear after Sportscene is aired ..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ainsley Harriott Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Roders will have a word with the disciplinary panel. Nothing will happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 1 hour ago, JimmyCant said: True if you think we will win 6 or 7 games between now and the end. Personally I’d rather have the insurance of our relegation rivals getting beat whoever they are playing, and that includes Hibs True if you think our relegation rivals will win 6 or 7 games before the end of the season. Personally I doubt it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sandyk Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Ruud Krol said: the 'extended' highlights appear after Sportscene is aired ..... Without commentary - Stamp is 36 seconds in.. Edited March 4, 2020 by sandyk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown user Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 15 minutes ago, wavydavy said: That's what I though then I heard the BT Ref saying that giving away the penalty was sufficient and no need for a second yellow. That is a stupid rule. So if he deliberately handles the ball outside the box it's a booking but because he gives away the penalty that is seen as sufficient punishment. So that actually encourages players to commit fouls in the box without fear of being sent of. I didn't think it was deliberate, just really stupid. I agree with the ref on this one, it was a foul in the box, but not all fouls are yellow, and a handball doesnt need to be deliberate to be a handball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 This is why, on balance, VAR needs Introduced to Scotland - we’d have had two pens against Rangers and a sending off last night with VAR. Its not perfect but it’s better than what we have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 This is why, on balance, VAR needs Introduced to Scotland - we’d have had two pens against Rangers and a sending off last night with VAR. Its not perfect but it’s better than what we have Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FERRY HEARTS Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 10 hours ago, Nikoliunas said: He's ment to be Hibs daft, if I was his age and Hibs daft I'd want to kill hearts for what they've done to my short shit life He s from a smeltic strong family background .And I heard a comment from his own mouth He hates us **** him Gorgie Rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3,844
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.