Jump to content
Shanks

ICT - Keatings - new tribunal rescinds card

Recommended Posts

davemclaren

I can understand why. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alan_R

Absolute farce, really shows up the state of officiating here.

 

That said, hes a wee nyaff anyway. So couldnt care less

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HardcoreJambo

Shocking decision. How on earth is that not overturned? 

 

The panel who made that decision know that was a blatant foul however do not want to admit they made a mistake. Embarrassing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shanks
8 minutes ago, HardcoreJambo said:

Shocking decision. How on earth is that not overturned? 

 

The panel who made that decision know that was a blatant foul however do not want to admit they made a mistake. Embarrassing.

 

Its a crazy decision, what makes it stranger is the fact that the Hamilton red card has been over turned against us but they don't overturn this decision? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bull's-eye

Is it not just a legal thing, they can't overturn Yellow cards for anything?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Phage

Well shan on Keats. Got clattered in that video.

 

Cheats the lot of them. Alfredo would have got decision turned over

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
King Of The Cat Cafe

Shocking decision by the referee.

Even more shocking decision by the review panel.

 

Are any of us surprised?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
highlandjambo3

Can understand their rage......... how the fek was that a red for simulation and, even more staggering, how do 3 officials get to review this simulation and agree that the right decision was made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jamhammer

He's a wee Hibs rat but that's a ridiculous decision. Fair play the ref thought there was no contact but it's clear as ******* day in the clip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shanks
6 minutes ago, Bull's-eye said:

Is it not just a legal thing, they can't overturn Yellow cards for anything?

 

 

 

ICT paid the fee to appeal the decision and they said they had a right to appeal in their statement so surely it must've been possible to have it overturned.  Don't think they would pay a fee for nothing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His name is
19 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

I can understand why. 

Can you explain? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
highlandjambo3

I’m going to complain to the SFA about that decision, I know nothing will happen but, doing nothing will always lead to nothing.  I’ll post the above link and ask a very simple question, “was there or was there not contact with the player”,  it’s a fairly straightforward question.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
davemclaren
9 minutes ago, His name is said:

Can you explain? 

Because there was clear contact. A definite foul imo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
j1964m

This is when other clubs should stand up and back Inverness on this decision all clubs apart from the ugly sisters they are happy with there fair play rules

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
highlandjambo3
here’s what I sent, won’t expect a reply:
 
Just have to say, absolutely shambolic decision not to have this simulation overturned, clear contact was made with the player being barged over.  The 3 persons on the appeal panel should be ashamed of them selves.......here is the clip below.....what exactly were they Watching.
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mister Dee

To be fair, he is a Hibs ****. 
 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Smithee
7 minutes ago, Mister Dee said:

To be fair, he is a Hibs ****. 
 

Indeed, and Always Sunny in Philadelphia's just too shouty. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sooperstar
36 minutes ago, Bull's-eye said:

Is it not just a legal thing, they can't overturn Yellow cards for anything?

 

 

Bookings for simulation can be appealed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Footballfirst
35 minutes ago, Bull's-eye said:

Is it not just a legal thing, they can't overturn Yellow cards for anything?

 

The only Yellow card decisions that can be appealed are for simulation and mistaken identity. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vlad Magic

It’s very similar to the Jamie Walker one a few years back.

 

Walker taken out, booked for diving.

 

Shambles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Smithee

Shit, I didn't realise they were playing the evil Hunder 21 team, I demand blood

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
upgotheheads

"If SPFL clubs decide to appeal against a decision, they must prove that an obvious error has been made."

 

The decision seems to hang on the above statement.

 

The SFA and it's procedures are so obviously unfit for purpose that anything they do or say should be treated with suspicion. How many ways can this organisation find to shoot itself in the foot?

Edited by upgotheheads

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Footballfirst

Some other clubs comments

 

I agree with the sentiments in the Inverness statement that the whole JPP, it’s terms and how it is implemented, need to be completely torn up and rewritten, starting with a blank sheet. More about football and the spirit of the game and much less legalese.
 
I support these sentiments too - we’ve spoken so much about this to the powers that be and I personally feel we’ve not made much headway. Needs to change - and by the way if I hear the words ‘it’s a members organisation’ one more time I might cough my liver up laughing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
johnthomas

The guy was fouled plain and simple .

Using the word contact implies he went down because somebody touched him .

I really struggle to understand how these decisions , when reviewed , are upheld .

Don't really go for conspiracy theories but something is very wrong here 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hashimoto

SFA Cheats!......Griffiths stamps on a player, blatant stamp...SFA response "Move along, nothing to see here!" Keatings and ICT cheated, Well documented that the two scum weegie teams get everything in their favour. We really need our clubs to unite more and call out these clowns. The weegie mafia. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jambof3tornado
24 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

Because there was clear contact. A definite foul imo. 

Not a definite foul but clear contact, nothing unnatural in the way keating goes down so no simulation. Ref could have given keatings the foul or simply waved play on. He panics because he gives the foul against then realises its a 2nd yellow card and it snowballs. The panel as always look to protect the referees who clearly cannot be seen to be fekkin hopeless!!

 

I do think it was a foul to keatings btw.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forever Hearts

As if James Keatings would be giving a shit if that was a Hearts player on the wrong end of that decision. No sympathy for him whatsoever. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lovecraft

Who do they play in the final?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
davemclaren
4 minutes ago, Forever Hearts said:

As if James Keatings would be giving a shit if that was a Hearts player on the wrong end of that decision. No sympathy for him whatsoever. 

Strange post. It’s about right snd wrong rather than individual players. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Governor Tarkin

That is as blatant a foul as you'll see.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
heartsfc_fan
7 minutes ago, Lovecraft said:

Who do they play in the final?

 

 

Raith Rovers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ford donald
1 hour ago, Longshanks said:

https://ictfc.com/club-statement-9

 

They are certainly not happy about it!

 

Footage of 'dive' and ICT statement in link above.

 Absolutely shocking decision by the referee in the first place,but to turn their appeal down is beyond believe.The hamilton player had is appeal changed

why?He clearly handled the ball twice,stopped Boyce from having a goal scoring opportunity,no wonder the referee complaints are ongoing,poor standards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SectionDJambo

The kind of decision that would have had Super Ally asking, "who are these people?".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lovecraft
1 minute ago, heartsfc_fan said:

Raith Rovers

  Cheers.

 

Maybe someone from RR was involved with the panel?

 

They are just really corrupt in general though.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
His name is
1 hour ago, davemclaren said:

Because there was clear contact. A definite foul imo. 

Apolgies, I thought you were saying it was dive. I was going to question your sanity! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spellczech

Wow that is a real shocker.  Clearly spirit of the game doesn't mean anything to the lawyers, OF toadies in blazers, and pig-headed  authoritarian officials who run the game up here.

Edited by Spellczech

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dusk_Till_Dawn

Referees in Scotland are shit scared of upsetting the old firm. That’s the reason there are so many poor decisions. They’re not mistakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
black stump

Terrible decision, GFA bias as always, but nothing will be done as usual.

 

What video were they watching? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forever Hearts
29 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

Strange post. It’s about right snd wrong rather than individual players. 

Not really. James Keatings couldn't give a monkeys if that was a Hearts player so I will return that in kind. As for right and wrong, do me a favour. Were you screaming for Griffith's shot that was clearly over the line at Easter Road to be given, even though it was against Hearts? I can guess the answer. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AlphonseCapone
36 minutes ago, davemclaren said:

Strange post. It’s about right snd wrong rather than individual players. 

 

Agree baffling post. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HardcoreJambo
1 hour ago, King Of The Cat Cafe said:

Shocking decision by the referee.

Even more shocking decision by the review panel.

 

Are any of us surprised?

 

The most concerning part is that irrespective of what club you support in Scotland we'd all collectively say: No.

 

It sounds like bitterness and resentment towards the OF but the truth of the matter is that had that been an OF player it would have been overturned. The game up here is catered towards assisting the OF and clearly there are several people making money off their success that don't want change. The rest of the clubs in Scotland have to suffer the consequences and folk like Michael Stewart who speak out about this sort of stuff are immediately ejected from their jobs for challenging the blatant biases within our game. Scottish football is corrupt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spellczech

I see Hamilton from Hamilton got his red card rescinded...looked a red even if an "hard luck" one...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spellczech
12 minutes ago, Forever Hearts said:

Not really. James Keatings couldn't give a monkeys if that was a Hearts player so I will return that in kind. As for right and wrong, do me a favour. Were you screaming for Griffith's shot that was clearly over the line at Easter Road to be given, even though it was against Hearts? I can guess the answer. 

That is the attitude that both caused and continues this situation. Small-minded tribalism

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
XB52
17 minutes ago, Forever Hearts said:

Not really. James Keatings couldn't give a monkeys if that was a Hearts player so I will return that in kind. As for right and wrong, do me a favour. Were you screaming for Griffith's shot that was clearly over the line at Easter Road to be given, even though it was against Hearts? I can guess the answer. 

What a pathetic attitude to take but expected from you when the decision came in a game against your wee darlings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dusk_Till_Dawn

It’s a blindingly obvious foul. If that’s against the Old Firm it’s a penalty 100 times out of 100. No exceptions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Forever Hearts
1 minute ago, XB52 said:

What a pathetic attitude to take but expected from you when the decision came in a game against your wee darlings

And a typical, boring, unoriginal reply from you. But back to my point, were you screaming for Griffiths' 'goal' to be given when it was clearly over the line. Right and wrong remember. 👍

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shanks
3 minutes ago, Forever Hearts said:

And a typical, boring, unoriginal reply from you. But back to my point, were you screaming for Griffiths' 'goal' to be given when it was clearly over the line. Right and wrong remember. 👍

 

 

Did that decision go to a panel and then wasn't over turned? 

 

That's what we are discussing here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Real Maroonblood
8 minutes ago, XB52 said:

What a pathetic attitude to take but expected from you when the decision came in a game against your wee darlings

This.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dusk_Till_Dawn
5 minutes ago, Forever Hearts said:

And a typical, boring, unoriginal reply from you. But back to my point, were you screaming for Griffiths' 'goal' to be given when it was clearly over the line. Right and wrong remember. 👍


We’re talking about retrospective analysis. The Scottish FA has backed a referee who’s decision making is so bad it looks like actual cheating

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...