Ray Gin Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He nearly sent your club down the toilet, do you expect the EEN, read by hearts supporters who know this and don't like the boy. I'm not sure why you would expect any story to show him in a good light? Mr Romanov kept us at Tynecastle and extended our life span by several years at a time when we looked doomed. Legend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Mr Romanov kept us at Tynecastle and extended our life span by several years at a time when we looked doomed. Legend. This is the type of comment I was referring too. He could literally do no wrong in the eyes of some Frightening Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Notts1874 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 So Spencer still isn't a fan of Mr Romanov then?? I'm shocked. Shite article btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 No a wasted opportunity? Not really. If Vlad had been a well balanced individual and entirely sane he would never have thrown tens of millions at Hearts, so there wouldn't ever have been an "opportunity" to waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Not really. If Vlad had been a well balanced individual and entirely sane he would never have thrown tens of millions at Hearts, so there wouldn't ever have been an "opportunity" to waste. Correct. Given no one else was interested in is at the time, of there was no Vlad then, there would be no Hearts now, and any museum exhibits would be displayed elsewhere and be telling a different story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I like how Spencer and Jammy T are bashing their keyboards to suit an agenda. Simple question you two: Should Fedotovas have supported the museum idea, which is what the story is about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Dunphy Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Are the Romanov bum boys beeling? Good. Where were Romanov and his prize chumps for as we descended into administration? Captain Zal is included in the absence list. Trolling is against the rules mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I like how Spencer and Jammy T are bashing their keyboards to suit an agenda. Simple question you two: Should Fedotovas have supported the museum idea, which is what the story is about? What the article is about and what it descends into are usually two different things on here. Any VR thread turns into a wankfest with some fruit cake suggesting we create a statue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 What the article is about and what it descends into are usually two different things on here. Any VR thread turns into a wankfest with some fruit cake suggesting we create a statue And someone on the other side stating he's the devil incarnate. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Jammy T makes a very valid point re Zal that I've made before. He could've helped out whilst were going into Administration. He'd been disproportionately rewarded for a player of his ability. Instead he scratched himself until November before he needed to graft again such was his haul from his time with us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 And someone on the other side stating he's the devil incarnate. Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Sure. He's a divisive figure. He was the only show in town. Nobody would dispute that. But that doesn't mean we had to accept all the nonsense that took place in the form of unquestioning and unwavering gratitude. That's the stuff that made sections of our support the subject of ridicule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Sure. He's a divisive figure. He was the only show in town. Nobody would dispute that. But that doesn't mean we had to accept all the nonsense that took place in the form of unquestioning and unwavering gratitude. That's the stuff that made sections of our support the subject of ridicule I don't disagree but you do have to recognise we needed him when he first came in Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Sure. He's a divisive figure. He was the only show in town. Nobody would dispute that. But that doesn't mean we had to accept all the nonsense that took place in the form of unquestioning and unwavering gratitude. That's the stuff that made sections of our support the subject of ridicule I've not seen a single example of "unquestioning and unwavering gratitude" on this thread. Or of "accepting all the nonsense". Speaking of nonsense, I've seen a suggestion that a nutter throwing millions at Hearts should have been expected to act sensibly and responsibly with those millions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I've not seen a single example of "unquestioning and unwavering gratitude" on this thread. Or of "accepting all the nonsense". Speaking of nonsense, I've seen a suggestion that a nutter throwing millions at Hearts should have been expected to act sensibly and responsibly with those millions. You're at it FA. Many clowns on here love VR. Let's not insult anyone by pretending otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 What the article is about and what it descends into are usually two different things on here. Any VR thread turns into a wankfest with some fruit cake suggesting we create a statue Sigh. The "fruit cakes" suggest a statue because people like you froth at the mouth at the mere mention of Vlad. Now can you answer the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Sigh. The "fruit cakes" suggest a statue because people like you froth at the mouth at the mere mention of Vlad. Now can you answer the question? What was the question Geoff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 What was the question Geoff?Should Fedotovas have supported the FoH request to establish a museum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 Should Fedotovas have supported the FoH request to establish a museum? Imo no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 12, 2016 Share Posted October 12, 2016 Imo noSound. Most people on the thread were talking about the shite way the EEN portrayed that as opposed to the Vlad regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
64,078
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.