Clerry Jambo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Well, they scarpered and look what we have now..........GIRUY http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport/football/hearts/foh-chief-recalls-old-hearts-regime-scoffing-at-museum-idea-1-4254225 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Well, they scarpered and look what we have now..........GIRUY http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/sport/football/hearts/foh-chief-recalls-old-hearts-regime-scoffing-at-museum-idea-1-4254225 If it was just full of statues of Vlad it might have got the thumbs up..................the ego maniac rocket that he was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's all looking good for the future. I'm impressed with pretty much all of what the FOH are doing. But its a little disingenuous not to give Romanov the credit for originally keeping us at Tynecastle, which has led to all of this now being possible. There was no other show in town at the time and without him, there would be no Gorgie stand, never mind a museum to put in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clerry Jambo Posted October 11, 2016 Author Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's all looking good for the future. I'm impressed with pretty much all of what the FOH are doing. But its a little disingenuous not to give Romanov the credit for originally keeping us at Tynecastle, which has led to all of this now being possible. There was no other show in town at the time and without him, there would be no Gorgie stand, never mind a museum to put in it. Oh craigieboy you have now turned this into a 15 pager!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's all looking good for the future. I'm impressed with pretty much all of what the FOH are doing. But its a little disingenuous not to give Romanov the credit for originally keeping us at Tynecastle, which has led to all of this now being possible. There was no other show in town at the time and without him, there would be no Gorgie stand, never mind a museum to put in it. No one can deny that, we were gone from Tynie if Romanov hadn't stepped in. Just like we were gone as a club if the fans, FoH and Anne hadn't stepped in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 The spin in the article is pretty crass. Fedotovas was right to say museums on their own don't make money. As part of a stadium tour they might do so but you'd also need to market Tynecastle as a destination for tourists. Sadly, Tynie isn't exactly Old Trafford or Anfield. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 No one can deny that, we were gone from Tynie if Romanov hadn't stepped in. Just like we were gone as a club if the fans, FoH and Anne hadn't stepped in Yes, but my point is that you can't even have the FOH if we didn't have Vladimir Romanov. The plain truth is that for the vast majority of fans, supporting Hearts is about doing so at Tynecastle. It might not be the case for that vast majority, but for me the whole experience of being a Hearts supporter would've been massively diluted by moving elsewhere. You can point out a million flaws if you like, but I'll always be incredibly grateful to him that we didn't have to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Yes, but my point is that you can't even have the FOH if we didn't have Vladimir Romanov. The plain truth is that for the vast majority of fans, supporting Hearts is about doing so at Tynecastle. It might not be the case for that vast majority, but for me the whole experience of being a Hearts supporter would've been massively diluted by moving elsewhere. You can point out a million flaws if you like, but I'll always be incredibly grateful to him that we didn't have to. I don't see any Hearts fans that aren't grateful to him for that? It's like saying you can't even have Romanov if you didn't have Wallace mercer. The FACT is he saved Tynecastle. It's also FACT that he did a lot wrong during his tenure which also seen us nearly lose the Club as well as Tynecastle. So he should be always remembered for saving Tynie and the fans, FoH and Anne for saving Tynie and the club! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craigieboy Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I don't see any Hearts fans that aren't grateful to him for that? It's like saying you can't even have Romanov if you didn't have Wallace mercer. The FACT is he saved Tynecastle. It's also FACT that he did a lot wrong during his tenure which also seen us nearly lose the Club as well as Tynecastle. So he should be always remembered for saving Tynie and the fans, FoH and Anne for saving Tynie and the club! There were others involved in bids for Hearts when Wallace took over. There was only VR when Tynecastle was going to be bulldozed and turned into flats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mollo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I'm certainly grateful what he did when he first came in - the good years were more than good! We got loads of great memories from his input. But while I'm not having a go at the post saying it, I can't get this habit of referring to 'wouldn't have happened without Vlad' EVERY time we refer to the good other people have done. Ann, Bryan Jackson, even ourselves via the foundation cannot be praised for a single thing without someone saying "Well you've got Vlad to thank for it really". I get where they are coming from - but what is the timescale on this obsession? Do we thank the Pieman for not having messed us up MORE than he did prior to Vlad coming in? (thanks for leaving some tatters for Vlad to pick up Chris - what a man!) I really like one point this article states - football is all about business nowadays, you need to be backed by as many as possible as well. Vlad's regime didn't market us very well at all, Ann Budge has done great work on that front. We're in a good place - and I'd like to thank her, Bryan and ourselves the fans for that. Nobody else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I'm certainly grateful what he did when he first came in - the good years were more than good! We got loads of great memories from his input. But while I'm not having a go at the post saying it, I can't get this habit of referring to 'wouldn't have happened without Vlad' EVERY time we refer to the good other people have done. Ann, Bryan Jackson, even ourselves via the foundation cannot be praised for a single thing without someone saying "Well you've got Vlad to thank for it really". I get where they are coming from - but what is the timescale on this obsession? Do we thank the Pieman for not having messed us up MORE than he did prior to Vlad coming in? (thanks for leaving some tatters for Vlad to pick up Chris - what a man!) I really like one point this article states - football is all about business nowadays, you need to be backed by as many as possible as well. Vlad's regime didn't market us very well at all, Ann Budge has done great work on that front. We're in a good place - and I'd like to thank her, Bryan and ourselves the fans for that. Nobody else. I think being grateful to Vlad is moot in this story. The spin from the EEN is completely unnecessary because the previous regime, at a time when money was too tight to mention, were right to say a museum wouldn't do anything for the bottom line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sifter Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 What an agenda driven piece of pish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 What an agenda driven piece of pish. Who has the agenda? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I think being grateful to Vlad is moot in this story. The spin from the EEN is completely unnecessary because the previous regime, at a time when money was too tight to mention, were right to say a museum wouldn't do anything for the bottom line. Correct. And then there is the 'comical' meerkat mentions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sifter Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Who has the agenda? The Evening News. "Vlad was bad Vlad was bad Vlad was bad" Repeat to fade... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mollo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I think being grateful to Vlad is moot in this story. The spin from the EEN is completely unnecessary because the previous regime, at a time when money was too tight to mention, were right to say a museum wouldn't do anything for the bottom line. To be fair Geoff, spin from a newspaper doesn't surprise me. It's as usual as birds in the sky or bacon coming from pigs. I see what your saying. Nonetheless - some points are okay in it, I'm not fussed as to why Vlad's boys wouldn't give us a museum if I'm honest. I'm just enjoying what we have now. EDIT: I agree with other points here too - the meerkat stuff is painfully cringeworthy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1652 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 The Evening News. "Vlad was bad Vlad was bad Vlad was bad" Repeat to fade... He nearly sent your club down the toilet, do you expect the EEN, read by hearts supporters who know this and don't like the boy. I'm not sure why you would expect any story to show him in a good light? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf's Mate Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He nearly sent your club down the toilet, do you expect the EEN, read by hearts supporters who know this and don't like the boy. I'm not sure why you would expect any story to show him in a good light? The EEN don't give a rats arse what Hearts fan think and nor do they publish a story simply for our gratification. A lot of Hearts fans refuse to read it and for good reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XB52 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He nearly sent your club down the toilet, do you expect the EEN, read by hearts supporters who know this and don't like the boy. I'm not sure why you would expect any story to show him in a good light? he saved our club and Tynecastle, although what that has to do with you I just don't know. Stick to commenting on hibs stories or piss off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 The Evening News. "Vlad was bad Vlad was bad Vlad was bad" Repeat to fade... Fair enough, they do have a few Hibby wankers amongst them. Maybe still hurting about the 5-1 butt **** we gave them which the World witnessed. PHM acknowledge the good and bad of Vlad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sifter Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He nearly sent your club down the toilet, do you expect the EEN, read by hearts supporters who know this and don't like the boy. I'm not sure why you would expect any story to show him in a good light? Nae disrespect, but I'm no interested in defending Vladimir Romanov to a hibby. I'll say this though, you're talking as if the entire Hearts support are against him. Youre wrong. Very wrong. Or trolling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sifter Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Fair enough, they do have a few Hibby wankers amongst them. Maybe still hurting about the 5-1 butt **** we gave them which the World witnessed. PHM acknowledge the good and bad of Vlad Correct mate. But Vlad turning down a museum when we were hemmoraging (sp) money is a complete non story. But it doesn't stop them having a dig tho. Wankers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 he saved our club and Tynecastle, although what that has to do with you I just don't know. Stick to commenting on hibs stories or piss offThis. LTHC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walrus Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 If it was just full of statues of Vlad it might have got the thumbs up..................the ego maniac rocket that he was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 The spin in the article is pretty crass. Fedotovas was right to say museums on their own don't make money. As part of a stadium tour they might do so but you'd also need to market Tynecastle as a destination for tourists. Sadly, Tynie isn't exactly Old Trafford or Anfield. To be fair though, neither FoH or Hearts say it will make money either. I think Brian's point may be that the museum making money isn't the be all and end all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 To be fair though, neither FoH or Hearts say it will make money either. I think Brian's point may be that the museum making money isn't the be all and end all. Only now it isn't, thanks to fans' monthly contribution. It did matter then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Only now it isn't, thanks to fans' monthly contribution. It did matter then. At least the Romanov regime showed some financial prudence in one area then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guess The Crowd Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 The spin in the article is pretty crass. Fedotovas was right to say museums on their own don't make money. As part of a stadium tour they might do so but you'd also need to market Tynecastle as a destination for tourists. Sadly, Tynie isn't exactly Old Trafford or Anfield. Agree with you about the crass spin, but the artcle itself is pretty decent. It's just a stupid headline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gorgie rd eh11 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 EEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf's Mate Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 That looks like an original Banksy piece. Could be worth a fortune Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walrus Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 That looks like an original Banksy piece. Could be worth a fortune Christmas Prints available....?99.99+P&P PM for details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 To be fair though, neither FoH or Hearts say it will make money either. I think Brian's point may be that the museum making money isn't the be all and end all.It's not a criticism of FoH. It's a criticism of the shit in the link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf's Mate Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Christmas Prints available....?99.99+P&P PM for details Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's basically a 'look how far we've come' spin. I personally appreciate the good things Vlad did for us at the time, but we also managed to survive and prosper after his time ended with administration. The new museum looks fantastic and one of the good things about it is that it will evolve over time. It's a brilliant concept and fits in with the new image of the club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It's all looking good for the future. I'm impressed with pretty much all of what the FOH are doing. But its a little disingenuous not to give Romanov the credit for originally keeping us at Tynecastle, which has led to all of this now being possible. There was no other show in town at the time and without him, there would be no Gorgie stand, never mind a museum to put in it. Correct, and there were more important things to spend our money on those days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cut The Crap Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Apart from the tortuous imagery in the first three paragraphs, I though the article was pretty good. Deserved a better headline. I was never a big fan of the previous regime ( ), but to be fair I thought community engagement was one of the few things they actually did very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GavK1012 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 If it was just full of statues of Vlad it might have got the thumbs up..................the ego maniac rocket that he was! Haha fecking class!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Once again this will turn into a wankfest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Terrible piece of journalism. Trying to create a picture of the "former soviet" and his henchman cackling with laughter as a good Scottish laddie stands, cap in hand, begging for a museum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cut The Crap Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Yes, awful stuff at the beginning. "former soviet" just makes no sense. Do they mean Vlad? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I see Brian Cormack is still spinning the line that diverting FoH subs for two years from repaying Ann to funding the stand will delay fan ownership by only 6 to 8 months. I voted for the diversion of funds but would prefer not to have my intelligence continually insulted. At current subscription levels it delays fan ownership by two years. In Vlad's day a less polite word than "spin" would be used to describe such misinformation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 I see Brian Cormack is still spinning the line that diverting FoH subs for two years from repaying Ann to funding the stand will delay fan ownership by only 6 to 8 months. I voted for the diversion of funds but would prefer not to have my intelligence continually insulted. At current subscription levels it delays fan ownership by two years. In Vlad's day a less polite word than "spin" would be used to describe such misinformation. You strike me as a real pro FOH type Best not compare the Vlad era with anything in living memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambogemz Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 You strike me as a real pro FOH type Best not compare the Vlad era with anything in living memory He stated that it MIGHT only delay things by 6-8 months if subscription remains high. If that really is the case then perhaps the funds that the foundation were contributing to working capital are being largely used as the stand contributions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He stated that it MIGHT only delay things by 6-8 months if subscription remains high. If that really is the case then perhaps the funds that the foundation were contributing to working capital are being largely used as the stand contributions. If the agreement had not been changed FoH would have begun repaying Ann's loan six months ago, would already have paid over one quarter, and the agreement and share transfer would have ended about 18 months from now. As things now stand FoH won't begin paying off Ann's loan for another 18 months. The original agreement was not a "five year" agreement but an agreement running until Ann's loan was repaid. There was a back stop of 5 years basically to protect Ann if Subs fell off and the loan had not been repaid by then. The agreement was not a "five year plan". The only way there would now be a delay of only 6 to 8 months (compared to the original agreement) is if FoH subs doubled or more sometime soon. I have no problem with the revised agreement, just the pretence that the revised agreement is something it isn't. I aso have a slight problem with Brian's comment about fans having to step up to the mark again for other additional funding in the future. I and many others will be happy to do so but I am not sure why we "need to". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Are the Romanov bum boys beeling? Good. Where were Romanov and his prize chumps for as we descended into administration? Captain Zal is included in the absence list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socrates82 Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Vlad and his team had some pretty decent ideas and ambitions for Hearts. Shame the man himself was an absolute nutter. If he'd left the people he employed alone to do their jobs we could have been on to something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Vlad and his team had some pretty decent ideas and ambitions for Hearts. Shame the man himself was an absolute nutter. If he'd left the people he employed alone to do their jobs we could have been on to something.He squandered a fortune, which if properly directed could have seen us well positioned to challenge regularly. Instead he spunked it but is heralded by elements of our support because he kept us at Tynecastle. That's largely the justification offered for the circus that ensued Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 He squandered a fortune, which if properly directed could have seen us well positioned to challenge regularly. Instead he spunked it but is heralded by elements of our support because he kept us at Tynecastle. That's largely the justification offered for the circus that ensued It was his fortune, or at least a fortune he controlled, so he could squander it as he chose. On the whole I am glad he chose to squander it on Hearts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 It was his fortune, or at least a fortune he controlled, so he could squander it as he chose. On the whole I am glad he chose to squander it on Hearts. No a wasted opportunity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homme Posted October 11, 2016 Share Posted October 11, 2016 Pretty sure we won several community related awards during vlads tenure so i won't be having a pop at him or his associates for not backing a museum. Also remains to be seen whether ours will make money. I suspect not once everyone has been a handful of times. We aren't that big a draw outside our own fan base. The museum is wonderful though and I can't wait to see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.