scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 If MM does come in , he may have two or three players in mind to improve the side. He will also want to have a look at the current squad and assess them from his own perspective. For some players that may provide a chance for a fresh start. Here is my list of players who have a chance to shine in the next three months to influence MM. there are only a few who I think are safe for now Banks Berra Driver Glen Jonsson Palazuelos High earners - prove they're worth it or be put put up for sale: Kingston Pinilla Beslija Aguiar Nade squaddies Wallace karapides Neilson Stewart Miko Chesny Zaliukas Ivaskevicius Mole a chance to provers Thomson McGowan Robinson Copil Rapnik Kostadinov Templeton Basso Bjornsson Out the doorers Elliot (no chance of playing given his failed loan spell at Well) Makela (doubt if he will be back) etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I can't wait to see what MM thinks of Pinilla. Should be interesting to say the least! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffundo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 If MM does come in , he may have two or three players in mind to improve the side. He will also want to have a look at the current squad and assess them from his own perspective. For some players that may provide a chance for a fresh start. Here is my list of players who have a chance to shine in the next three months to influence MM. there are only a few who I think are safe for now Banks Berra Driver Glen Jonsson Palazuelos High earners - prove they're worth it or be put put up for sale: Kingston Pinilla Beslija Aguiar Nade squaddies Wallace karapides Neilson Stewart Miko Chesny Zaliukas Ivaskevicius Mole a chance to provers Thomson McGowan Robinson Copil Rapnik Kostadinov Templeton Basso Bjornsson Out the doorers Elliot (no chance of playing given his failed loan spell at Well) Makela (doubt if he will be back) etc MM will put a rocket up Pinillas arse! he will have him firing on all cylinders or he will be punted. I hope MM gets the gig on monday! if he does and Vlad allows him a small budget and a free reign on moving out the sheet, then we will have a very good season 08/09 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sconnie Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Who's out of contract in Scotland that could have impressed him? Ross McCormack Barry Nicholson Mark Kerr I'd take any of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neave Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Who's out of contract in Scotland that could have impressed him? Ross McCormack Barry Nicholson Mark Kerr I'd take any of them. Especially Kerr - great wee player, IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I hope that he will look to build the side around the likes of Neilson, Berra, Wallace, Jonsson, Driver - our best players this season. I hope that all our luxury players go - if McGhee judges that he can't get professional performances out of them. And obviously he will if allowed to move on the Kaunas players. He played a fair number of youngsters at Motherwell and was pretty shrewd in who he brought in. So hopefully he can take the best of what we have and build on it - as Burley did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboAl Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Who's out of contract in Scotland that could have impressed him? Ross McCormack Barry Nicholson Mark Kerr I'd take any of them. I wouldn't take Kerr or Nicholson. McCormack being that bit younger still has scope for improvement, so possibly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Who's out of contract in Scotland that could have impressed him? Ross McCormack Barry Nicholson Mark Kerr I'd take any of them. I would be delighted with all 3 of them. Especially Kerr (who has been linked) and McCormack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sconnie Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I wouldn't take Kerr or Nicholson. McCormack being that bit younger still has scope for improvement, so possibly. I think all 3 would make an impact, which is what we need. I've always been impressed with Nicholson, Kerr has had a good season (especially in the cup final before his suicide back pass) and McCormack looks a quality player. Anyone else impressed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
troonjambo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 If MM does come in , he may have two or three players in mind to improve the side. He will also want to have a look at the current squad and assess them from his own perspective. For some players that may provide a chance for a fresh start. Here is my list of players who have a chance to shine in the next three months to influence MM. there are only a few who I think are safe for now Banks Berra Driver Glen Jonsson Palazuelos High earners - prove they're worth it or be put put up for sale: Kingston Pinilla Beslija Aguiar Nade squaddies Wallace karapides Neilson Stewart Miko Chesny Zaliukas Ivaskevicius Mole a chance to provers Thomson McGowan Robinson Copil Rapnik Kostadinov Templeton Basso Bjornsson Out the doorers Elliot (no chance of playing given his failed loan spell at Well) Makela (doubt if he will be back) etc the best fresh start:):):):) will be the fans no longer thinking they should be picking the team i look forward to it with a passion as well as seeing what a proper manager/coach set up will get out off these players i have maintained for the last year and a half that we have no idea how good/bad our players are untill there managed properly (with the exception of elliott ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I'd love to see Nicolson at Hearts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 the best fresh start:):):):) will be the fans no longer thinking they should be picking the team i look forward to it with a passion as well as seeing what a proper manager/coach set up will get out off these players i have maintained for the last year and a half that we have no idea how good/bad our players are untill there managed properly (with the exception of elliott ) Absolutely agree I am sure there will be some players who we have written off who will respond to McGhee, and others who wil not fit his desired pattern of play. Also agre it is noce to have something to look forward to next season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Tucker Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I'd love to see Nicolson at Hearts... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 He'd take no pish from anyone..... Here's Johnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boaby Ewing Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I hope that he will look to build the side around the likes of Neilson, Berra, Wallace, Jonsson, Driver - our best players this season. I hope that all our luxury players go - if McGhee judges that he can't get professional performances out of them. And obviously he will if allowed to move on the Kaunas players. He played a fair number of youngsters at Motherwell and was pretty shrewd in who he brought in. So hopefully he can take the best of what we have and build on it - as Burley did. I'd certainly hope that he believes he can. But it'll need a big clear-out of the dross surrounding them. I don't think he'll have the budget of Burley, so I'd be happy with third next season given it'll probably take a bit of time to rebuild. Looking at the league through rose tinted glasses though, it shouldn't actually take Burley's budget to at least push the Old Firm next season. They are utter gash. But I don't want to get carried away - so presuming he signs, I'd settle for a team that actually looks like it cares, plays a bit of football, and scooshes third place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Did Burley (sorry Bhurley) actually have a budget ? Trying to think what he forked out when he came in ? ?350K for Pospisil... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Tucker Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Did Burley (sorry Bhurley) actually have a budget ? Trying to think what he forked out when he came in ? ?350K for Pospisil... 500k for Bednar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 500k for Bednar. Bednar was a Kaunas player IIRC.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 Did Burley (sorry Bhurley) actually have a budget ? Trying to think what he forked out when he came in ? ?350K for Pospisil... Player budget includes wages as well as signing on fees etc - so you would have to add in Bednar, Brellier , Skacel + whoever else he brought in (I was never sure whether guys like Camazola, Fyssas were entirely Romanov or whether Burley had a say?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malcolm Tucker Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Bednar was a Kaunas player IIRC.... ...Well Kaunas paid 500k for him then:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boaby Ewing Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 It's maybe unfair to call it's 'Burley's budget' - but there's no getting away from the fact that we must have been shelling out a fair bit on wages that season with Takis, Janny and the like. I'm presuming we're operating (or aiming to) operate on a smaller budget now, despite the wages being paid to Kingston and Pinilla. I don't think any players McGhee might bring in would be massive earners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawrrrrrrr Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Given romanov to date has not given a manager carte blanche on players, has admitted previously he sees this as his job and has already made moves to offer trials etc what makes you think McGhee will be given any choice in who comes in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gards Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Given romanov to date has not given a manager carte blanche on players, has admitted previously he sees this as his job and has already made moves to offer trials etc what makes you think McGhee will be given any choice in who comes in? Another positive, pro Hearts response from Prancer. Excellent dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sked21 Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I hope that he will look to build the side around the likes of Neilson, Berra, Wallace, Jonsson, Driver - our best players this season. I hope that all our luxury players go - if McGhee judges that he can't get professional performances out of them. And obviously he will if allowed to move on the Kaunas players. He played a fair number of youngsters at Motherwell and was pretty shrewd in who he brought in. So hopefully he can take the best of what we have and build on it - as Burley did. If you are saying Neilson then you may as well just throw in Elliot as well. Mark Reynolds Stephen Hughes (Can't believe I am saying that) Ross McCormack Chris Porter Barry Nicholson Willo Flood Mark Kerr (Still not sure about him) Alan Gow Russel Anderson Darren Barr Frazer Wright Marius Niculae These are all players we should be looking at. But with a much bigger budget I would expect McGhee to look at quite a few players down south. Then there is Vladimir Romanov's contacts. I reckon if/when McGhee is appointed then the transfer market will be interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Given romanov to date has not given a manager carte blanche on players, has admitted previously he sees this as his job and has already made moves to offer trials etc what makes you think McGhee will be given any choice in who comes in? By the fact that MM IS at Hearts, indicates what's gone on behind the scenes. Unless you think MM is another puppet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 If he does arrive, his first job IMO, is to get rid of all the overpaid ****e we have accumulated over the past couple of years. Decide if there are any players he can salvage from the current imposters, then bring in the quality of player a team spending 12.49M on wages should have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 If he does arrive, his first job IMO, is to get rid of all the overpaid ****e we have accumulated over the past couple of years. Decide if there are any players he can salvage from the current imposters, then bring in the quality of player a team spending 12.49M on wages should have. Correctamundo. Still, we'll only be 2years behind schedule when he's actually started Operation DeadWood Expulsion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 Given romanov to date has not given a manager carte blanche on players, has admitted previously he sees this as his job and has already made moves to offer trials etc what makes you think McGhee will be given any choice in who comes in? I doubt if it is ever as black and white as you paint it (perhaps a change of user name to 'Paint it Black' come to think of it....) Jefferies - before cup win Robinson vetoed - then after cup win had a budget ( but according to Robinson overspent it) Levein - started off as head coach only - could suggest players - by the end had more authority within a set budget (I would guess) Robertson - not in long enough Burley - appears that he had a budget but that Romanov also purchased players - Burley (see signature) at least at first had some sor tof control over whether these players played or not Rix - had a little budget (Johnston, Hackett etc) but largely Romanov and his DOF etc brought in the players Ivanauskas - par tof the Romanov team so probably decision by committee Frail - no budget - probably allowed to look at local players (Templeton, Husband etc) McGhee - I would guess will have a budget + will have a chance to look at 'suggested' players + (I hope) the right to play or not play as he will pick the team. Of course if what I suggest is the deal it could easily go mammories northwards if McGhee decides never to play a Romanov recommended purchase..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawrrrrrrr Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 By the fact that MM IS at Hearts, indicates what's gone on behind the scenes. Unless you think MM is another puppet. Sadly I do think if he comes he will be, although I think he has more self respect than actually to come and be a puppet Romanov for 3 years here and countless years in his other enterprises has been very dictorial, why do you think he will change suddenly for hearts? I dont think a bad season or a bit of dissent from the fans is enough to change his opinion The fact we have happily been offering trials and scouting players whilst we don't have a manager just reinforces this to me If romanov was serious about giving a new manager control, we wouldnt be offering extended contracts to the likes of Basso or offering trials to Buscher and god knows what else he is upto which hasnt hit the media Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Of course if what I suggest is the deal it could easily go mammories northwards if McGhee decides never to play a Romanov recommended purchase..... I hope Mcghee has the balls to not even consider doing anything Romanov "recomends", and walk if Vlad doesn't accept that. We've all witnessed the results of Vlad sticking his nose in where it ain't wanted over the past 2 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Trials Prancer....Trials.... And what's to say that the players like Buscher aren't ones McGhee wants to see ? Extending contracts are presumably done by the club so that they can generate a revenue when it comes to selling them on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gards Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Sadly I do think if he comes he will be, although I think he has more self respect than actually to come and be a puppet Romanov for 3 years here and countless years in his other enterprises has been very dictorial, why do you think he will change suddenly for hearts? I dont think a bad season or a bit of dissent from the fans is enough to change his opinion The fact we have happily been offering trials and scouting players whilst we don't have a manager just reinforces this to me If romanov was serious about giving a new manager control, we wouldnt be offering extended contracts to the likes of Basso or offering trials to Buscher and god knows what else he is upto which hasnt hit the media Based on what - what do you know about Mark McGhee to know what he will and won't accept to take on the managerial position at Heart of Midlothian. Questions - Do you know Mark McGhee? - Do you know any associates of Mark McGhee who know what his current thoughs are? If you can answer any of the above with a YES - then I will listen to what you say. Othwerise you are spouting your usual negative PISH (a term you have used before in a subject heading) means nothing to me and should mean nothing to the majority on this board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rawrrrrrrr Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Trials Prancer....Trials.... And what's to say that the players like Buscher aren't ones McGhee wants to see ? Extending contracts are presumably done by the club so that they can generate a revenue when it comes to selling them on. So your saying we must have poached McGhee? I don't think for a second that is the case I would suggest its a last gasp PR Stunt to boost the St Sales. As for it being a fresh start, what part of tying down basso and others to new contracts beyond the year they have left is a fresh start for a new man Surely this should be left up to the new man in complete control? and im sure they would not be offering basso a new deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Extending contracts are presumably done by the club so that they can generate a revenue when it comes to selling them on. Had Vlad wished to give a manager that control, these decisions (especially dishing out 3 year contracts) could've waited till the manager came in and assessed the players. None of the players were coming out of contract, so there was no need for a rush decision on extensions. Other than to allow Vlad to do what he wanted before the new man comes in...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 I hope Mcghee has the balls to not even consider doing anything Romanov "recomends", and walk if Vlad doesn't accept that. We've all witnessed the results of Vlad sticking his nose in where it ain't wanted over the past 2 years. I am sure that McGhee and Romanov will have a shared understanding of how their relationship will work. I am also sure that Romanov will have and express his opinions on team matters. there will be times - like the Tall contract situation, when Romanov from a business perspective will want to influence team selection.I think many CEOs/ chairmen/ owners will have that sort of influence and I don't have a problem with it if it is based on a sound business judgement. I am sure they will have discussed this and agreed what should happen in these cases. Of course, it may not work in practice. In which case we are screwed..... And also of course, as soon as someone is dropped or selected and it seems not to fit with form, there will be a host of hand wringers on here suggesting that we are screwed already, and we should polish off our placards and pitchforks. We will only know them by their actions, not words. I doubt whether McGhee would put up with 'recommendations' which are in fact orders, unless they are within a pre-agreed framework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ando Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 we dont want romanov picking the team. this should be the team .....only on KB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Rob Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Sadly I do think if he comes he will be, although I think he has more self respect than actually to come and be a puppetPerhaps, but I doubt it. The bottom line is that MM cannot lose by coming to Hearts, since if he fails he can walk away and everyone will blame interference from VR. Romanov for 3 years here and countless years in his other enterprises has been very dictorial, why do you think he will change suddenly for hearts? Because CO and others have been trying to persuade him that his methods aren't working. Of course he may pay no attention, but the wording of the Jan 1 statement suggests otherwise. I dont think a bad season or a bit of dissent from the fans is enough to change his opinion I agree, but it's not just one bad season or one bit of dissent. The fact we have happily been offering trials and scouting players whilst we don't have a manager just reinforces this to me This part I can't understand at all. The Civil Service continues to run the country when Parliament isn't in session, during elections, etc. It's unrealistic to expect all business at Hearts to cease while we don't have a manager (which we haven't had for some time, since Frail was a caretaker). It's not ideal, but I am certain it goes on at all clubs to a certain extent. Both sides of the OF have recently signed players without a manager in place, and nobody bats an eyelid. If romanov was serious about giving a new manager control, we wouldnt be offering extended contracts to the likes of Basso or offering trials to Buscher and god knows what else he is upto which hasnt hit the media . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I am sure that McGhee and Romanov will have a shared understanding of how their relationship will work. I am also sure that Romanov will have and express his opinions on team matters. there will be times - like the Tall contract situation, when Romanov from a business perspective will want to influence team selection.I think many CEOs/ chairmen/ owners will have that sort of influence and I don't have a problem with it if it is based on a sound business judgement. I am sure they will have discussed this and agreed what should happen in these cases. Of course, it may not work in practice. In which case we are screwed..... I doubt whether McGhee would put up with 'recommendations' which are in fact orders, unless they are within a pre-agreed framework. Agree with this. I see either Vlad keeps his mits out and McGhee brings us success, or Vlad interferes and McGhee is gone by Christmas. Time will tell how it works out. And also of course, as soon as someone is dropped or selected and it seems not to fit with form, there will be a host of hand wringers on here suggesting that we are screwed already, and we should polish off our placards and pitchforks. We will only know them by their actions, not words. Equally, even if the same farcical interference by the mad one continues, and player after player speaks out about the problems via the press, there will be those on here who make excuses for the mad one and pretend his interference is not the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Only a Game Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I'd love to see Nicolson at Hearts... Me too. One of the most underrated players in the SPL IMO. Dont fancy Kerr much. Havent ever seen him contribute much to a game. McCormack probably already has plans for next season so we might have missed out on that one. I'd love us to go and get Lee Miller back. Towards the top of the wish list would be Riordan and/or Gow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 Agree with this. I see either Vlad keeps his mits out and McGhee brings us success, or Vlad interferes and McGhee is gone by Christmas. Time will tell how it works out. Equally, even if the same farcical interference by the mad one continues, and player after player speaks out about the problems via the press, there will be those on here who make excuses for the mad one and pretend his interference is not the problem. I doubt if it would get to that point now, JR. If Romanov agrees not to interfere, then does, I think Mcghee would be off very quickly. The way I see it, if Mcghee comes then the fans, whether hatckers, vlad sheep or shades in between, can only gain from this. It wil clarify the interference thing once and for all. Interference - = McGhee goes, fans act No interference - = McGhee stays, fans happy It should unite the fans, I think. My plea would be we at least give mcGhee 6 months to manage his way, before we start examining every team selection for the fingerprint of Romanov's interfering hand. Otherwise I'll get very grumpy again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I doubt if it would get to that point now, JR. If Romanov agrees not to interfere, then does, I think Mcghee would be off very quickly. The way I see it, if Mcghee comes then the fans, whether hatckers, vlad sheep or shades in between, can only gain from this. It wil clarify the interference thing once and for all. Interference - = McGhee goes, fans act No interference - = McGhee stays, fans happy Agree those are the two scenarios, although as we've seen over the past 2 years, I'm not sure what the fans can actually do about it. It should unite the fans, I think. My plea would be we at least give mcGhee 6 months to manage his way, before we start examining every team selection for the fingerprint of Romanov's interfering hand. Otherwise I'll get very grumpy again.... I think you should be directing your plea at Vlad, not the fans....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Only a Game Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I hope Mcghee has the balls to not even consider doing anything Romanov "recomends", and walk if Vlad doesn't accept that. We've all witnessed the results of Vlad sticking his nose in where it ain't wanted over the past 2 years. I dont mind him listening to Vlad and his "recommendations" He'll have to I think. As long as when he walks out the door after a "recommendations" meeting, he has a wee chuckle to himself, shakes his head, and picks his own team. I also think he might have to accept that players nearing the end of their contracts who have not re-signed, will not be allowed to play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 I dont mind him listening to Vlad and his "recommendations" He'll have to I think. As long as when he walks out the door after a "recommendations" meeting, he has a wee chuckle to himself, shakes his head, and picks his own team. Yeah, pretty much what I'm getting at. Vlad can say whatever he likes, but McGhee needs to just ignore him and pick his own team, and let Vlad fire him if he cannie handle it....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 the best fresh start:):):):) will be the fans no longer thinking they should be picking the team i look forward to it with a passion as well as seeing what a proper manager/coach set up will get out off these players Agree with that. We all think we know the best team, but when others are chosen they should receive our support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 Yeah, pretty much what I'm getting at. Vlad can say whatever he likes, but McGhee needs to just ignore him and pick his own team, and let Vlad fire him if he cannie handle it....... That'll do me too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelly Terraces Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 It's OK, I've assessed the current squad for Mr McGhee, thus saving him the onerous task of working out each players differing abilities. Here is my in depth dosier: They're nearly all total p*sh. Start again, and bring your own blokes in, really, just do it, you won't be wrong. Cheers. It's OK, don't thank me people, I'm just doing my job as a Hearts fan. Ta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 It's OK, I've assessed the current squad fro Mr McGhee, thus saving him the onerous task of working out each players differing abilities. Here is my in depth dosier: They're nearly all total p*sh. Start again, and bring your own blokes in, really, just do it, you won't be wrong. Cheers. It's OK, don't thank me people, I'm just doing my job as a Hearts fan. Ta. Nice one Nelly - I could have saved myself a lot of one fingered typing there... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelly Terraces Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 Thanks. I struggled long and hard to try and define a generic categorization for the current playing staff, but I feel Mr McGhee will find the one that, after much deliberation, I settled for won't be far off the mark in it's basic assessment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott herbertson Posted May 24, 2008 Author Share Posted May 24, 2008 Thanks. I struggled long and hard to try and define a generic categorization for the current playing staff, but I feel Mr McGhee will find the one that, after much deliberation, I settled for won't be far off the mark in it's basic assessment. Perhaps I'll send him a telegram To Mr Mark McGhee "Orange Juice" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted May 24, 2008 Share Posted May 24, 2008 It's OK, I've assessed the current squad for Mr McGhee, thus saving him the onerous task of working out each players differing abilities. Here is my in depth dosier: They're nearly all total p*sh. Start again, and bring your own blokes in, really, just do it, you won't be wrong. Cheers. It's OK, don't thank me people, I'm just doing my job as a Hearts fan. Ta. The conversation between McGhee, Leitch and Romanov thus... MM - W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk,W@nk VR - ehski ? MM - W@nk, W@nk, W@nk, W@nk, Good Guy (as he points at Leitch) VR - sighski MM - And finally, (as he points at VR), W@nk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.