Jump to content

Rangers might need to find ?90m within a year !


kingdannyb

Recommended Posts

Maybe this well be merged with the main Rangers financial thread but the Glasgow Evening Times says this:

 

Meanwhile, the latest accounts for the club show the debt due within the next year has nearly doubled to ?49.1million.

Long-term debts fell from ?38m to ?20.4m. In total, Rangers? debts are up 6% to ?69.4m.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm shite with finances and don't really pay attention to that side of football. Realistically, what's the chances of Rangers going bust? Or going into any other sort of financial meltdown?

 

Stuff like this seems to come out quite often but clubs always seem to survive - Portsmouth being the one that sticks out to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gregory House M.D.

I'm shite with finances and don't really pay attention to that side of football. Realistically, what's the chances of Rangers going bust? Or going into any other sort of financial meltdown?

 

Stuff like this seems to come out quite often but clubs always seem to survive - Portsmouth being the one that sticks out to me.

 

Going bust's unlikely IMO.

 

Going into administration is nearly a certainty though. Also IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is that by the way? :lol:

 

He hasnt posted on this thread and don't want to risk the automatic ban that comes with mentioning his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this well be merged with the main Rangers financial thread but the Glasgow Evening Times says this:

 

Meanwhile, the latest accounts for the club show the debt due within the next year has nearly doubled to ?49.1million.

Long-term debts fell from ?38m to ?20.4m. In total, Rangers? debts are up 6% to ?69.4m.

 

The latest accounts were apparently not signed by Accountants so are not the official position. It doesn't necessarily mean that they are wrong but it doesn't mean they are right either. Unless you have access to a fully certified copy I wouldn't get too excited one way or another.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The latest accounts were apparently not signed by Accountants so are not the official position. It doesn't necessarily mean that they are wrong but it doesn't mean they are right either. Unless you have access to a fully certified copy I wouldn't get too excited one way or another.

 

I thought all company accounts had to be signed off by the auditors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going bust's unlikely IMO.

 

Going into administration is nearly a certainty though. Also IMO.

 

....and the difference is what, exactly? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gregory House M.D.

....and the difference is what, exactly? :blink:

Ones ceasing to exist the other isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whatever the truth is, I'm fairly certain that the GFA will do everything they can to keep the ugly sisters going. They are unfortunately here to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought all company accounts had to be signed off by the auditors?

 

Yes, which is why they are worthless as they stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He hasnt posted on this thread and don't want to risk the automatic ban that comes with mentioning his name.

 

 

Is it Jesus? That'll be just after God said "You get to go down and live on Earth..." and just before God said "...and then they nail you to a cross".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely they will just sell Jelavic for 100 million! Problem solved!!!

 

 

Given it's Govan, more likely they will try to sell 100 million jellies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...