Fermit the Krog Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stupid Sexy Flanders Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 According to who? Hopefully this is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 We've been 24 carat junk since the day he walked in the club and you can take that to the bank. Killing the club every day imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 According to who? Hopefully this is true. Just a text. Words had at half time and full time. Will hear more soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Hunt Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo ry Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Can someone please explain what's happened? On my phone so can't see the bit under subject... Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramer Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Decent player but becoming a complete liability. I think i'd just go with Jonsson and Zaliukas at centre half from now on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramer Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Can someone please explain what's happened? On my phone so can't see the bit under subject... Cheers! Subject is 'Finished at Hearts'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greedy_Jambo Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 We were just as guff when he was subbed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 We were just as guff when he was subbed. We weren't though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_razors_edge Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd show zaliukas the door long before I would Webster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davesmith Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Got to feel for PS's sucessor who is going to have some bridge mending to do. There's a reason your players are falling out with you PS and it isn't because your right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 Ok, a load of Shite. Just the usual handbags after a defeat, words had between Zal, Paulo and Webster. Delete as appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
world_3 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Ok, a load of Shite. Just the usual handbags after a defeat, words had between Zal, Paulo and Webster. Delete as appropriate. Shame, he's a ******* liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wotta Lad Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd show zaliukas the door long before I would Webster. In terms of ability I'd have to agree, but Webster has shown time and again that he cannot be relied on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Howdy Doody Jambo Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Apparently. If true then thats us totally donald ducked , hope not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboX2 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 We weren't though. At the back we were. We were better after half time due to the addition of an extra attacking player in the midfield. Now why Mrowiec was favoured over Webster is beyond me. And if I were Webster I'd be asking the same questions I imagine he must've asked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearts_crazy Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Just a text. Words had at half time and full time. Will hear more soon Must be true then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 utter shite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fermit the Krog Posted September 25, 2011 Author Share Posted September 25, 2011 Must be true then No, It's shite as I've already said. :teehee: Still, if you want to let it upset you, carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Last two posters in "haven't read the whole thread" gaffe. Edit: since 3 of us posted at the same moment, that'd be the last two posters before the last two posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smith&Weston Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Webster is finished. Not only does he have fitness issues but mental ones too. A waster of time! His career has been on the downward spiral since he left the first time. Walter Smith knew ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3fingersreid Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 obviously Zal is defo not flavour of the month - hard to believe watching him the last few games he was he man JJ wanted back in the team when vlad dropped him and looked the part when he returned webster will never win over all the Hearts fans although I wish he could return to his form when he first came to us so how would a pairing of McGowan and Barr be accepted and more importantly would/could it work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 how would a pairing of McGowan and Barr be accepted and more importantly would/could it work I think I'm going to be sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 how would a pairing of McGowan and Barr be accepted and more importantly would/could it work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumbernauldjambo83 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I'd show zaliukas the door long before I would Webster. This! Time after time the big chap has cost us goals that have effectively resulted in us losing the matches! Wednesday night and again today! Punt now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alba gu Brath Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Zal has to go first. Liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3fingersreid Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I think I'm going to be sick. what makes you feel sick? I`m only trying to find out what some people want and given that we have neither a Terry /Ferdinand/kompany available WHO do you want? as for the owl you`ll need to help this computer illiterate old man out as I aint got a fekin clue what your on about Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I think I'm going to be sick. what makes you feel sick? I`m only trying to find out what some people want and given that we have neither a Terry /Ferdinand/kompany available WHO do you want? as for the owl you`ll need to help this computer illiterate old man out as I aint got a fekin clue what your on about Get to feck off my internet. Only a wee joke. Wouldn't want Barr in TBH. McGowan and McKay would be the only option for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3fingersreid Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Get to feck off my internet. Only a wee joke. Wouldn't want Barr in TBH. McGowan and McKay would be the only option for me. hey no offence taken just wanted to know now if I can work out what ...............WUM means Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 hey no offence taken just wanted to know now if I can work out what ...............WUM means Wind Up Merchant I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Wind Up Merchant I think Aye cos you ain't sure are you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Aye cos you ain't sure are you? TBH, I don't get alot of the abbreviations on here. I wrote I think as a wee insurance policy. While we're at it, what the Feck does IIRC mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor FinnBarr Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 TBH, I don't get alot of the abbreviations on here. I wrote I think as a wee insurance policy. While we're at it, what the Feck does IIRC mean? "I think" it means, "if I remember correctly" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 I think the key word in the OP (OK I realise it is the only word, but that may be why it is so key) is apparently. According to the wee Portuguese guy that stands on the side of the pitch he was removed for tactical reasons (per his post match interview), and then we didn't change the tactics. Made total sense to me sitting in the stand, I could see exactly what he was trying to do by removing our steadiest defender in the first half and replacing him in that position with Mrowiec. Clear as feckin mud from a tactical point of view and made a huge difference, we looked much more positive in the second half . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Maybe Webster isn't giving PS enough time to develop his possesion/passing game? That's a shame, cos we're so close to nailing it. At least PS dresses sharp though eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Just Came To Say Kello Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Getting my hopes up just to see them dashed.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the windae cleaner Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Getting my hopes up just to see them dashed.. this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One flew over Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Webster will be here longer than PS of that I am sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amadjambo Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Would like to know why Webster was subbed today because Sergio's 'tactical reasons' explanation in strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboAl Posted September 25, 2011 Share Posted September 25, 2011 Would like to know why Webster was subbed today because Sergio's 'tactical reasons' explanation in strange. Maybe trying to divert attention away from AW's lack of fitness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Maybe trying to divert attention away from AW's lack of fitness. It showed today right enough, i.e. lack of fitness. He was the only one of the back 4 who looked like he knew what he was doing defensively. The three other defenders, who are presumably all super fit contributed nothing defensively, other than errors. If there is anything out of the ordinary about him being taken off I hope it is because he has spoken his mind in the dressing room at half time, and pointed out that the manner in which they are being asked to play is benefiting the team not one iota, and is punishing for those viewing. The only way we are going to win games is by putting the ball in the back of the net, and if you don't play forward thinking players and provide proper service to your strikers (another problem in that he insists on going with one, a tactic we know doesn't work for HMFC. If it takes a third party, in the form of a player, to point this out then so be it. However, in such circumstances I'd prefer them to come out and say "a player or players think my tactics are shit hence the substitution" instead of "subbed for tactical reasons", especially when the tactics changed not one jot. Same boring pish on show after Webster went off, just as we had witnessed first half, and at Ayr on Wednesday, Tynecastle last Saturday and Inverness the weekend before that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Some top notch ITKness from our most recent wondermole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Webster strolled through the game on Sunday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 I hope Webster is 'finished' every week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SRC HMFC Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 On his day our best player at the club, international class defender if he stays fit, all these people saying 'i hope he's finished' etc should really get a grip of themselves, one of Hearts best signings in along time and showed his ability against Celtic with a brilliant display. Of course when it comes to him and Zaliukas, no one likes to comment when they play well, silly me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southside1874 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Some top notch ITKness from our most recent wondermole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Some top notch ITKness from our most recent wondermole. In fairness to the guy, he did correct himself once he got clarification that what had happened was a bit of post-defeat argy-bargy and not what he had originally heard. Still... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.