Sten Guns Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Sounds rather bizarre when you look at it that way. Are we really a dirty side? Or is this a farce? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholas Brody Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Sounds rather bizarre when you look at it that way. Are we really a dirty side? Or is this a farce? Temps and Skacel were booked and they weren't even on that long Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chat Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Wasn't there so can't really say. What I will say though is that those stats are of no surprise to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2NaFish Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 temps was booked for unsporting behaviour according to the bbc. couldnt comment on the others. p.s. Well done adrian on staying on the pitch. It was probably a daft booking to pick up after 20 seconds but to avoid another for 89 minutes isnt something i'd've bet on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mac_fae_Gillie Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 first game this season we got many so either the ref hates us or the players were taking post Thursday blues out on Killie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northernsoulboy01 Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 TBF Skacels sounded like a 'take one for the team foul'. Mind you,that dick Barnes made it sound like he attacked the Killie player with a machete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulysses Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Sounds rather bizarre when you look at it that way. Are we really a dirty side? Or is this a farce? Quality over quantity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts Heritage Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Listening to Hearts World all bookings were merited as they took players out when in attacking positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Mince Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Temps and Skacel were booked and they weren't even on that long Mrowiec: 1st minute, 1st foul - 1st booking. Templeton: Just on the park, 1st foul - booked. Skacel: On the park 5-10 mins, 2nd foul - booked. As for Zaliukas, I can't remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kramer Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Depends on the nature of the 11 fouls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMA MAROON Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Listening to Hearts World all bookings were merited as they took players out when in attacking positions. BBC said Zal was unlucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Templeton'sUnderpants Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 A lot of them were first fouls and temps and Skacels definitely weren't merited. Mrowiecs was fair enough. Zals could have gone either way really. I would have been fine with them if killie had recieved the same standards. But they got away with all sorts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the general Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Double standards from that tube of a ref who is meant to be a Hearts fan - he never ever gives us a break and comes down over hard on us started seasons ago at pittodrie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Typical though isn't it? It happens pretty much every week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Mrowiec booking was fair enough and his own fault for being a cart horse and somehow letting the killie lad in behind him, the other three looked soft. What I want to know is when does it become am even playing field, because killie players got away with worse challenges than we were, and were throwing themselves down all over the park. It must be acceptable to kick a ball away and scream in a refs face if you don't wear maroon too, Calum Murray is a complete dick! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambopompey Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Mrowiec booking was fair enough and his own fault for being a cart horse and somehow letting the killie lad in behind him, the other three looked soft. What I want to know is when does it become am even playing field, because killie players got away with worse challenges than we were, and were throwing themselves down all over the park. It must be acceptable to kick a ball away and scream in a refs face if you don't wear maroon too, Calum Murray is a complete dick! think Rudi's booking was more for a fwe niggles he had been putting in, temps booking was a joke. and how can a killie player go through Hammil and not get booked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 During coverage of the cricket today Shane Warne passed comment on how good the umpire was and then said that it hasn't always been that way. The biggest problem was inconsistency and, that is where the biggest improvement has come with cricket decisions. Our refs are absolutely consistent in being inconsistent when it comes to Hearts compared with other teams - Fact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali-1874 Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Thought Skacel's and Templeton's were very harsh. Zaliukas' was the other end of the pitch but if it was a foul it was definitely a booking and Mrowiec deserved his. That Dayton is a diving, moaning prick though, should definitely have been booked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Francis Albert Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 St Johnstone got 3 yellows from a grand total of six fouls. Serves them right for not doing the decent thing and surrendering at Parkhead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 think Rudi's booking was more for a fwe niggles he had been putting in, temps booking was a joke. and how can a killie player go through Hammil and not get booked To be fair, Rudi should have been booked ten minutes earlier mate for his kick on a Killie player on the edge of the box, how he got away with that I'll never know, so you're probably spot on re his booking. It's frustrating however when Dayton throws himself down in the box looking for a spot kick, and Murray does nothing about it, he knows it was a blatant dive, yet he didn't book him, he would have been quick to flash the cards at the other end, that's for sure! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
amadjambo Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 temps was booked for unsporting behaviour according to the bbc. couldnt comment on the others. p.s. Well done adrian on staying on the pitch. It was probably a daft booking to pick up after 20 seconds but to avoid another for 89 minutes isnt something i'd've bet on. Easy for Adrian to avoid a 2nd booking. He never put another tackle in. Cant understand that jkb Adrian love in. He's a defensive midfielder that doesn't tackle, bar 1 vs Aberdeen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KF87 Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 It's frustrating however when Dayton throws himself down in the box looking for a spot kick, and Murray does nothing about it, he knows it was a blatant dive, yet he didn't book him, he would have been quick to flash the cards at the other end, that's for sure! I don't think Dayton dived but it would have been harsh if it had been given Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillieMitch Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Less to do with refereeing and more to do with Hearts players not coping with James Dayton I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ali-1874 Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Less to do with refereeing and more to do with Hearts players not coping with James Dayton I think Admittedly Templeton's tackle was a hard one on Dayton (not overly dirty) but apart from that Dayton went down at the slightest touch. Never a penalty in a million years either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Less to do with refereeing and more to do with Hearts players not coping with James Dayton I think To be fair Mitch (I feel like I'm talking to myself here ), I thought that Grainger coped very well with Dayton today, he didn't really get away with a lot apart from throwing himself to the ground a few times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KillieMitch Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 The one trait in Dayton I don't like is that he goes to ground easy. One of those players who goes down when staying on his feet would actually of led to a better opportunity. He's a young lad though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Sifter Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Said it before but if someone out there could source OPTA stats showing bookings per fouls commited, we could no doubt sue the GFA on the basis of the evidence shown. Other teams players can get away with two or three fouls before being booked. We are hammered after our first. Stinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 The one trait in Dayton I don't like is that he goes to ground easy. One of those players who goes down when staying on his feet would actually of led to a better opportunity. He's a young lad though You'd better watch mate, if he dares to do it against one of the Old Firm there will be a witch hunt against him, it's the way it is......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy's sock Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 St Johnstone got 3 yellows from a grand total of six fouls. Serves them right for not doing the decent thing and surrendering at Parkhead. Can I see a pattern here, yes I can, but what does it meen? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy's sock Posted August 21, 2011 Share Posted August 21, 2011 Depends on the nature of the 11 fouls. This is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Treasurer Posted August 22, 2011 Share Posted August 22, 2011 I would say Mrowiec's booking was the only one the ref got right. Temps was just a typical forwards tackle, a foul but didn't merit anything else. Rudi's was a joke Zal again a foul but very harsh to receive a yellow. Dayton dives and then throws the ball away and argues with the ref and linesman, surely at least one of those actions justified a booking. It seems to be the pattern that Hearts players are booked for almost every foul they commit while other teams commit the same type of fouls without punishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.