Geoff Kilpatrick Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Isn't it ironic that the first issues that occurred with Vlad came from the playing of "Liffs" (sic). Now we seem to have reached the complete opposite - no "Liffs" are being allowed to play! Please note that the use of the term "Liffs" so that the hard of thinking on here can understand the point. I am well aware Kello is Slovakian! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 It's a bit like rain on your wedding day Geoff. Or even a free ride when you're already there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 What is ironic is how many of the Zal haters are up in arms because he's not playing, I wonder why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zdrastvway Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Already at your wedding ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hughesie27 Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Thing is he just isn't taking on our free advice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 It's a bit like rain on your wedding day Geoff. Or even a free ride when you're already there Scrap that.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad-Stupid Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 What is ironic is how many of the Zal haters are up in arms because he's not playing, I wonder why? These will be the same people that are all out buying new hats today. MadfudJJZalBouzidEggyPalazGTF! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flux Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Mr. Play It Safe was afraid to fly. Mr McGoo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 What is ironic is how many of the Zal haters are up in arms because he's not playing, I wonder why? Eh................ Because he was our only fit and available CH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Eh................ Because he was our only fit and available CH. Wasn't intended as a dig at you DH but you can't deny that there are some on here who don't want to see Zal in the team or as captain unless it gives them a chance to have a go at Vlad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 What is ironic is how many of the Zal haters are up in arms because he's not playing, I wonder why? It's not really ironic. Regardless of whether a player is rated or not, it should be up to the manager to decide if he plays the player or not, not the owner. So even if people do not rate Zal I can still understand why they'd be annoyed at this. FWIW I quite like Zaliukas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Wasn't intended as a dig at you DH but you can't deny that there are some on here who don't want to see Zal in the team or as captain unless it gives them a chance to have a go at Vlad I honestly don't think there are people on here who are that complex. I don't like Zaliukas but when we are heading to Ibrox without Webster and Bouzid he surely has to play ? And when he's been made 'unavailable' for selection by VR despite our lack of of CH's surely folk have a right to have a go at VR. Or don't they ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Not until we know the facts behind it no, I'm no Vlad apologist but I'd rather not go through life presuming the worst about him either. I'd rather form my opinion on matters by dealing with facts in hand not another posters preconception Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 I honestly don't think there are people on here who are that complex. I don't like Zaliukas but when we are heading to Ibrox without Webster and Bouzid he surely has to play ? And when he's been made 'unavailable' for selection by VR despite our lack of of CH's surely folk have a right to have a go at VR. Or don't they ? People can have a go at VR all they want will it change anything he does or make the slightest whit of difference? NFC, All that going about things does is fuel the fires of hibs celebration bonfire. Stop feeding the hobos oxygen! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Not until we know the facts behind it no, I'm no Vlad apologist but I'd rather not go through life presuming the worst about him either. I'd rather form my opinion on matters by dealing with facts in hand not another posters preconception VR should not be influencing the Managers team selection at all. If there has been an issue which requires disciplinary action I'm pretty sure a man of JJ's experience can handle such matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 VR should not be influencing the Managers team selection at all. If there has been an issue which requires disciplinary action I'm pretty sure a man of JJ's experience can handle such matters. Do we know he hasn't been involved? Edit: was referring to JJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 People can have a go at VR all they want will it change anything he does or make the slightest whit of difference? NFC, All that going about things does is fuel the fires of hibs celebration bonfire. Stop feeding the hobos oxygen! In otherwords....... Only discuss nice sweet flowery stuff and pretend the other stuff doesn't exist. Nah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 In otherwords....... Only discuss nice sweet flowery stuff and pretend the other stuff doesn't exist. Nah. Agree with you here though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Do we know he hasn't been involved? Edit: was referring to JJ He says he was involved in the Kello situation but then again he said Kello was injured. Re : Zal Unless it's something that happened on the Friday night then he wouldn't have planned to have Zal in his team if there was a problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregory House M.D. Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 Not until we know the facts behind it no, I'm no Vlad apologist but I'd rather not go through life presuming the worst about him either. I'd rather form my opinion on matters by dealing with facts in hand not another posters preconception This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 I think with Kello he knew what was happening all along with Zal it's a bit more out the blue so can't say for certain who was behind it but that doesn't mean he was against it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brownkg Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 In otherwords....... Only discuss nice sweet flowery stuff and pretend the other stuff doesn't exist. Nah. Eh no just saying pointless wasting time on giving hobbos more wet dreams. Deffo not pretending it doesn't exist just don't see the need to keep smiles on their faces by banging on about it all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamgerrard Posted May 8, 2011 Share Posted May 8, 2011 just had a thought maybe vlad is planning to sell zal to a russian team soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4,905
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.