Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 He didn't score at the weekend...and neither did Jamie Mole. Conclusive proof, if any were needed, that the two are of exactly identical ability in absolutely every area of their overall game? I think so. Show some love xx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 He didn't score at the weekend...and neither did Jamie Mole. Conclusive proof, if any were needed, that the two are of exactly identical ability in absolutely every area of their overall game? I think so. Show some love xx How many minutes did they each get on the pitch though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tazio Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 I t'nac eergasid htiw taht etam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 How many minutes did they each get on the pitch though? Bednar got more. Good point, Mole's clearly better. I t'nac eergasid htiw taht etam. Dexter made me stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FORTHCLYDE Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Bednar better start scoring there is an extra 500,000 due to us if West Brom get promoted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi must stay Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 He didn't score at the weekend...and neither did Jamie Mole. Conclusive proof, if any were needed, that the two are of exactly identical ability in absolutely every area of their overall game? I think so. Show some love xx well said. Exactly the same in ability the fact one has scores about 20 more goals than the other is totally irrelevant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 well said. Exactly the same in ability the fact one has scores about 20 more goals than the other is totally irrelevant Actually, over the past four days their goals/games ratio is identical. Edit : Actually, Mole's is better. Edit : Hang on, no it isn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strachsuit Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 An England call-up cannot be far away for Mole. He has consistantly performed for Hearts over the past two years without a doubt. He has however, been consistantly p***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 An England call-up cannot be far away for Mole. He has consistantly performed for Hearts over the past two years without a doubt. He has however, been consistantly p***. I personally think that Copil's to blame for it all. He's done nothing for the first team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Harris Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Dexter made me stop. (o: ?spɹɐʍʞɔɐq uɐɥʇ ɹǝɥʇɐɹ uʍop ǝpısdn ʇnoqɐ ʇɐɥʍ NB: that probably only works if you've got a decent unicode font selected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambojambo Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 He didn't score at the weekend...and neither did Jamie Mole. Conclusive proof, if any were needed, that the two are of exactly identical ability in absolutely every area of their overall game? I think so. Show some love xx Excellent point! By the same token, Chelsea lost a goal at the weekend - Hearts didn't. Therefore Robbie is a better RB than their RB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Harris Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Excellent point! By the same token, Chelsea lost a goal at the weekend - Hearts didn't. Therefore Robbie is a better RB than their RB! indeed, Robbie is better than Essien. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 Excellent point! By the same token, Chelsea lost a goal at the weekend - Hearts didn't. Therefore Robbie is a better RB than their RB! Exactly! In fact, I'd take it so far as to say that Hearts are just better defensively than Chelsea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do The Dance Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Exactly! In fact, I'd take it so far as to say that Hearts are just better defensively than Chelsea. We drew 0-0. Liverpool lost 3-0. Now what does that tell you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 We drew 0-0. Liverpool lost 3-0. Now what does that tell you? We are better than Liverpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 He didn't score at the weekend...and neither did Jamie Mole. Conclusive proof, if any were needed, that the two are of exactly identical ability in absolutely every area of their overall game? I think so. Show some love xx Conclusive proofe that credibility matches avatar:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makween Posted March 25, 2008 Author Share Posted March 25, 2008 Conclusive proofe that credibility matches avatar:) Conclusive proof that credibility matches yer maw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2 Posted March 25, 2008 Share Posted March 25, 2008 Conclusive proof that credibility matches yer maw. That's really cool, can't get much more creditability than that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.