gorgie_rebel Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Charles in for Traynor this week Think I'll listen to him sypathising with all the Gers accountants who'll no doubt be phoning or maybe i'll just call up an call him a bawbag?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moriarty Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Charles in for Traynor this week Think I'll listen to him sypathising with all the Gers accountants who'll no doubt be phoning or maybe i'll just call up an call him a bawbag?? Do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboinglasgow Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 He already has said the Rangers fans deserve better (i.e. more money to spend.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Thank god... Otherwise I would not have known that Rangers are actually in fine financial state. I totaly missed that Miller is going for ?700,000 though! Superb! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Rangers fans threatening to close accounts again... Lloyds would be delighted to have all those unplanned overdrafts repaid, go on the Bears, pay your debts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 i will not be listening to chuck dung performing rangers propaganda duty. i've recently eaten and would rather keep it down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboinglasgow Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Rangers fans threatening to close accounts again... Lloyds would be delighted to have all those unplanned overdrafts repaid, go on the Bears, pay your debts! it's the arrogance of Rangers fans that always gets me. The idea that they have the right to keep getting lots of money to spend. Ignoring the fact that Lloyd's could easily say right then you are in admin, and Rangers lose 20 points. The excuse they have for the bank giving them more money is that "if we get more money we can get better players and win the league and get into champions league and get more money..." The problem with this is that it is a big gamble, I am sure the bank (at least in this case) doesn't want to use public money on a gamble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big D Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Comedy gold. Some guy moaning about low cup crowds. Turns out he disnae go to games himself. To be fair the researchers seem to be letting some of the stupidest people in Scotland through. Serves the wee scrotelicker right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 it's the arrogance of Rangers fans that always gets me. The idea that they have the right to keep getting lots of money to spend. Ignoring the fact that Lloyd's could easily say right then you are in admin, and Rangers lose 20 points. The excuse they have for the bank giving them more money is that "if we get more money we can get better players and win the league and get into champions league and get more money..." The problem with this is that it is a big gamble, I am sure the bank (at least in this case) doesn't want to use public money on a gamble. Rangers? Arrogance? Shooorlee nut! Know what you mean bud... Let's hope they keep up the sabre-rattling and eventually the bank do lose patience and say feck you... Pay up now or sell some bigger assets now to cover your debt. It is little wonder they have this arrogance though, listen to the way Dung is rejecting out of hand that the tax-bill is anything to worry about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 i will not be listening to chuck dung performing rangers propaganda duty. i've recently eaten and would rather keep it down. Prior to the matches..... I had the misfortune of hearing him stumble through an explanation of why selling Kenny Miller might not be a bad idea. I could have sworn I overheard SDM in the background whispering the crap into his ear. He is nothing short of an odious little creep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Prior to the matches..... I had the misfortune of hearing him stumble through an explanation of why selling Kenny Miller might not be a bad idea. I could have sworn I overheard SDM in the background whispering the crap into his ear. He is nothing short of an odious little creep. a thoroughly horrendous human being. represents everything that's rotten about scottish football, and that's some achievement for a character who is merely a 'journalist'. he is the most well known of such entities, although there are quite a few more of his ilk. a minging minion of mordor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 a thoroughly horrendous human being. represents everything that's rotten about scottish football, and that's some achievement for a character who is merely a 'journalist'. he is the most well known of such entities, although there are quite a few more of his ilk. a minging minion of mordor. Yep. He's wormed his way into people's lives and thinks he is now friends with 3/4 of Scottish football. He really has no idea he's sold whatever soul he had. And all for a seat somewhere near SDM, Walter Smith and Super Ally. The little weasel makes me boak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboinglasgow Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 On a sidenote, does anyone think that it is quite supicious that the day after Walter moans about having no money, Whyte pops up and says that he is still going to buy the club just there is "delays." To me it is a typical DM tactic of distracting the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fc1874 Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 The facade by chick dung. As I have said, squirm you f#### Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmaroon Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 it's the arrogance of Rangers fans that always gets me. The idea that they have the right to keep getting lots of money to spend. Ignoring the fact that Lloyd's could easily say right then you are in admin, and Rangers lose 20 points. The excuse they have for the bank giving them more money is that "if we get more money we can get better players and win the league and get into champions league and get more money..." The problem with this is that it is a big gamble, I am sure the bank (at least in this case) doesn't want to use public money on a gamble. It has been the same from at least the 1950's onward! I first became aware of it when I was 9 years old and got a doing at school from three 12 year old blue noses (they get it from their parents) just because we beat them 4-0 in the Cup! It hurt at the time but it was worth it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Treasurer Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 it's the arrogance of Rangers fans that always gets me. The idea that they have the right to keep getting lots of money to spend. Ignoring the fact that Lloyd's could easily say right then you are in admin, and Rangers lose 20 points. The excuse they have for the bank giving them more money is that "if we get more money we can get better players and win the league and get into champions league and get more money..." The problem with this is that it is a big gamble, I am sure the bank (at least in this case) doesn't want to use public money on a gamble. There's up to half a dozen clubs in Scotland that could argue that if the banks threw limitless funds at them then they'd have a pretty good chance of winning the league. It obviously won't happen so why do the huns think they should be an exception to this rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.