Jump to content

Team v Hamilton


JamboPete

Recommended Posts

Kello

 

Jonsson

Bouzid

Zaliukas

Palazuelos

 

Templeton

Mrowiec

Black

Skacel

 

Kyle

Elliott

 

No need to change a winning side!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hard to argue with that,i would normally say rest Zaliukas if he is carrying a knock...but that's not worked too well for us so far this season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its important to keep the run going and pick up another 3pts as we have 2 difficult away games after this at Motherwell & Rangers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snake Plissken

No need to change, Calum had a good impact when he came on, as did Stevo but I'd keep faith in the XI that have been winning and winning well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe,,,,, Stevenson for Black. Think it's a little more attacking for a home tie against a Hamilton. Also shows the players that no place is guaranteed.

 

Also thinking about resting a couple players for the next 2 big games. Maybe put in single T for double T, as he got a brace last time against Hamilton.unsure.gif

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would Bring in Tommo. Thats the only change I'd make.

 

Playing 12 players you say? What an ingenius idea.

 

I wonder why it's never been thought of before :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Treasurer

Maybe,,,,, Stevenson for Black. Think it's a little more attacking for a home tie against a Hamilton. Also shows the players that no place is guaranteed.

 

Also thinking about resting a couple players for the next 2 big games. Maybe put in single T for double T, as he got a brace last time against Hamilton.unsure.gif

 

 

Like most posters I see little reason for changing a winning team but both Elliot and Stevenson staked a claim with their contribution as subs last week.

Also Novikovas will be pushing to play some part after, by all accounts playing well for the NT during the week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe,,,,, Stevenson for Black. Think it's a little more attacking for a home tie against a Hamilton. Also shows the players that no place is guaranteed.

 

Also thinking about resting a couple players for the next 2 big games. Maybe put in single T for double T, as he got a brace last time against Hamilton.unsure.gif

 

Drop Black after his most promising spell in a Hearts shirt?

 

Errrr, na.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

as others have said, no changes unless there are injuries.

 

what i do hope though is that we canget a grip of the game early and build a lead so we can sub players to give a few a rest, and dare i say it blood some(maybe only one) yoofs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snake Plissken

With the Kilmarnock debacle still fresh in the memory, I'm confident the players are in the right frame of mind to take this one by the scruff of the neck.

 

It's a settled and confident side and they'll have benefited from the 'rest' of a week. No need to change it unless there are fitness issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the Kilmarnock debacle still fresh in the memory, I'm confident the players are in the right frame of mind to take this one by the scruff of the neck.

 

It's a settled and confident side and they'll have benefited from the 'rest' of a week. No need to change it unless there are fitness issues.

 

Same team but would like to see elliott play right up beside kyle as I think there is goals to be got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to give him a rest and as we are at home and should be getting the ball on the deck, I would maybe give both elliot/ts a start together and see how they get on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Craig Thomson for Eggert. More attacking full back with good deliveries for a home game like this. :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it is true that Gary Glen scored two and made 2 in the practice game the other day, he could get a run out if we have put the game to bed early enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep it the same if possible. No need to change the side ATM. The players look like one complete working unit now and not eleven individuals which is one of the main reasons for our recent success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Frankenstein Jambo.

Playing 12 players you say? What an ingenius idea.

 

I wonder why it's never been thought of before :rolleyes:

You are funny lololololol hahahahahaha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jambomickey

Kello

 

Jonsson

Bouzid

Zaliukas

Palazuelos

 

Templeton

Mrowiec

Black

Skacel

 

Kyle

Elliott

 

No need to change a winning side!!

that would be my choice and 4-0 to hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...