Spellczech Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 We have strikers in the squad. If we sign another then that just means Glen drops one place down the pecking order. How do all the people who called for Glen to be given chances again. and then to retain his place, feel about that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 ....christ this topic has been covered to death. WE DO NEED A STRIKER. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboMarc Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 We get a striker = a strong possibility to play 442, meaning Glen would still come on as a sub anyway! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greedy_Jambo Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 WE NEED 4 STRIKERS!! INCASE THE FIRST 3 ARE DUDS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam Tarts 1874 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Csaba is obviously still trying to get an experienced, proven goal-scorer on the cheap. It may still happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 We get a striker = a strong possibility to play 442, meaning Glen would still come on as a sub anyway! A fit Tullberg would mean we can play 442...Our central midfield would also likely get their erchies kicked if we played 442...Much as I like Aguiar, I think he is at his best when not man-marked by a taller player. Having Karipidis and Ruben/Stewart in there gives Aguiar space to make the team tick... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 1. we could do with a striker with a good scoring record. 2. we aren't going to get one by the looks of it. 3. it's not a total disaster if and when we end up without one. 4. if we did manage to get one, who's to say he would be any good or stay fit? nothing much more to it than that, not that i can think of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I'm uncertain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT's & Irons Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 A fit Tullberg would mean we can play 442...Our central midfield would also likely get their erchies kicked if we played 442...Much as I like Aguiar, I think he is at his best when not man-marked by a taller player. Having Karipidis and Ruben/Stewart in there gives Aguiar space to make the team tick... A fit Tullberg HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Stop it. Dean Ashton plays more football than Tullberg and he's dead, so I've heard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I'm uncertain. i don't know if you are that certain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rupert Pupkin Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I'm uncertain. Exactly a big man wee man combo usually works so GLEN with either NADE or TULLBERG may be the answer,plus we scoring goals from every position so it aint all bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I much prefer goal scoring midfielders. Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scallywag Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 What happens if Nade gets an injury. Elliot or Glenn up front on their own.......end of season. It's a very difficult role and needs a player with a bit of prescence. We need a bit of cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted January 30, 2009 Author Share Posted January 30, 2009 What happens if Nade gets an injury. Elliot or Glenn up front on their own.......end of season. It's a very difficult role and needs a player with a bit of prescence. We need a bit of cover. We change our style of play - like Celtic have had to do because Hesselink of Venegoor ;-) and Killen are always crocked...They have a midget front 5 at the moment with only Brown having any presence at all. Total opposite of MON & Burley teams but it seems to work to an extent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
62,982
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.