Paisley Jambo Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 I am not a great fan of Miko but thought his booking was right out of order. Diamond was fouling everything that moved and didn't get booked for persistence. Clear to me that Miko is a marked man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Freewheelin' Jambo Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Disgraceful decision. If only the club could keep a recored of this and present it to those corrupt swine at the SFA. If this was any other job Miko could claim for harassment at work. Its now so blatant, that's the thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groot Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 What got me was that the ref signalled it as persistent fouling but I couldn't think of him making any other fouls prior to that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lost in leith Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 What got me was that the ref signalled it as persistent fouling but I couldn't think of him making any other fouls prior to that Would be interesting to see footage of the whole game to spot the number of fouls Miko committed before being booked, and compare them with the number of fouls committed by certain Dons players. I'm not a Miko fan, but I think it's clear that certain refs are dying for an escuse to book him. The incident at Pittodrie last year was a classic. Brought down - a stonewall penalty. 3 Dons players scream at him for diving and he gets booked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Booked for being Miko, Oh you got booked for being Miko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Mackie, Considine & Diamond all committed more & worse fouls than Miko but Conroy didn't hesitate to flash the yellow card at Miko and try to fabricate other instances of persistent fouling ... meanwhile those Dons escaped any punishment until much later in the game - Stewart Dougal & other refs this season have also been extra keen to card Mikoliunas despite the antics of other players like Clarkston, Broadfoot, Boyd, Darcheville, Nakamura & etc etc .... it is inconsistent, incompetent & corrupt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Del1812 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 What got me was that the ref signalled it as persistent fouling but I couldn't think of him making any other fouls prior to that That was what really got on my skin as well. He was clearly just making that up to justify the booking, almost certain it was his first foul of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Every week he comes out and it's as if the ref has been briefed to keep an extra close eye on him, is it some sort of frat thing dating back to the Davis incident? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott_HMFC1874 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 I dont think the ref gave it for persistant fouling. He wasnt pointing right at the spot where Eggert took down Aluko, he was like running his finger up the line like he was saying "you stopped an attacking chance down the wing" still a ridiculous decision, the boy was at least 90 yards from goal with another 10 men to beat!! GFA GTF!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bean counter Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 A shocking decision by the ref Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 A shocking decision by the ref Surely you mean by the cheating GFA sponsored anti Hearts ref! Every other team gets these shocking decisions against the weegeie ^^^^s, where as we are on the end of them against everyone! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Surely you mean by the cheating GFA sponsored anti Hearts ref! Every other team gets these shocking decisions against the weegeie ^^^^s, where as we are on the end of them against everyone! Good grief wull, cheer up eh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Good grief wull, cheer up eh! nope its no working. we got done over again by the GFA, should be used to it by now I suppose. I hate being cheated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 nope its no working. we got done over again by the GFA, should be used to it by now I suppose. I hate being cheated You definitely should avoid the game next week then.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beats Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Hi everyone.New on here and thought i'd throw my opinion in.I'm not his biggest fan either but the ref had it in for him today.No doubt about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marshallschunkychicken Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Booked the name, not the foul. simple as that. Conroy's a knob anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beats Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Booked the name, not the foul. simple as that. Conroy's a knob anyway. Was it Conroy that Kingston called a racist? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Titor Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Disgraceful decision. If only the club could keep a recored of this and present it to those corrupt swine at the SFA. If this was any other job Miko could claim for harassment at work. Its now so blatant, that's the thing. Here's the thing with your suggestion in bold. They would simply laugh and say your right and then fine us for bringing the "intergity" of the officials and the game into disrepute!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Was it Conroy that Kingston called a racist? Indeed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toxteth O'Grady Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I dont think the ref gave it for persistant fouling. He wasnt pointing right at the spot where Eggert took down Aluko, he was like running his finger up the line like he was saying "you stopped an attacking chance down the wing" still a ridiculous decision, the boy was at least 90 yards from goal with another 10 men to beat!! GFA GTF!!!!! I think he mistook Miko for Eggert who he had previously warned. Conroy is useless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamboRobbo Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think he mistook Miko for Eggert who he had previously warned. Conroy is useless thats how it seemed to me. Clearly pointed over to where Eggert had been a bit lucky to get away without a booking. What a numpty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spellczech Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 What got me was that the ref signalled it as persistent fouling but I couldn't think of him making any other fouls prior to that Ref indicated the "foul" where he accidentally clipped Aluko's heel after Aluko had lost the ball. He did give a free kick for that one too right enough. The guy wanted to book Miko - of that I have no doubt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think he mistook Miko for Eggert who he had previously warned. Conroy is useless Given their history mistaken identity is a bit hard to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winston churchill Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 What got me was that the ref signalled it as persistent fouling but I couldn't think of him making any other fouls prior to that correct when the erse called him over, he started pointing at other areas of the pitch making out he had done it a few times:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jam Tarts 1874 Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think he mistook Miko for Eggert who he had previously warned. Conroy is useless That's how it looked to me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 the treatment of saul mikoliunas is anti-sport. there doesn't seem much point in having a sport if it can't be officiated in a fair manner, or even something close to fair. conroy seemed to have to justify himself by inventing the reason of persistent fouling.... unless of course he was just indicating various areas of the pitch where miko had merely been.... maybe miko was being booked for being miko. i've been saying for ages that miko should up sticks and pursue his career elsewhere for his own good, and before it's too late. he is a talented player and he should go and play in a league where his abilities and his basic right to earn a living are respected. the scottish football bubble isn't sophisticated or mature enough to set aside all historical wrongdoings and give a professional footballer a fair chance in life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 If anyone still believes that our view of Miko's treament is paranoia then I would have to ask who is delusional. That was a complete joke, Conroy moved quicker that Usain Bolt to get to Miko to get the card out. I would be very interested to hear his reasoning behind the award, particularly in light of the leeway permitted to a number of Aberdeen players, among which Considine was possible the least deserving of a caution. If we look at this season, we see that Miko is top of the SoS "bad boy" league thanks to one red and three yellows. How many of these sanctions were deserved? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 If anyone still believes that our view of Miko's treament is paranoia then I would have to ask who is delusional. That was a complete joke, Conroy moved quicker that Usain Bolt to get to Miko to get the card out. I would be very interested to hear his reasoning behind the award, particularly in light of the leeway permitted to a number of Aberdeen players, among which Considine was possible the least deserving of a caution. If we look at this season, we see that Miko is top of the SoS "bad boy" league thanks to one red and three yellows. How many of these sanctions were deserved? the sending off at ipox was particularly insidious. he was clearly impeded by papac's outstretched arm, albeit he fell a bit easily. countless incidents of the same ilk are treated as they should be.... the free kick awarded for the foul. if there had been no foul and miko had crumpled to the deck then fair enough, he has to accept the booking. if the referee had anything about him he would have awarded hearts the free kick they were due and warned miko that he runs the risk of a booking by going to ground too easily. but no, there's none of that for the panto villain miko, nah it's just an immediate and automatic booking. the second booking was borne out of complete rage and i can't blame the boy, he must have felt like boaking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rdewar42 Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think he mistook Miko for Eggert who he had previously warned. Conroy is useless That's how I saw it as well, (as I stated on another thread). If Conroy is so unobservant that he can confuse Miko and Eggert facially, then he is too incompetent to be a referee. In addition. To help the incompetent, the players have numbers on their backs! The whole event beggars belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrH Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 thats how it seemed to me. Clearly pointed over to where Eggert had been a bit lucky to get away without a booking. What a numpty. Yeah, but he'd only spoken to Eggert barely 5 minutes before the Miko booking, warning him that he'd be booked for his next foul. Could he really be that incompetent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie-Brown Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 Conroy knew perfectly well it was Miko there was no mistaken identity pi$h - Miko is a marked man by our ref's and treated far less leniently than many far worse offenders, it is corrupt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jarhead Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 If anyone still believes that our view of Miko's treament is paranoia then I would have to ask who is delusional. That was a complete joke, Conroy moved quicker that Usain Bolt to get to Miko to get the card out. I would be very interested to hear his reasoning behind the award, particularly in light of the leeway permitted to a number of Aberdeen players, among which Considine was possible the least deserving of a caution. If we look at this season, we see that Miko is top of the SoS "bad boy" league thanks to one red and three yellows. How many of these sanctions were deserved? I've noticed Miko at the top of the bad boy league as well. After a quarter of the season are we seriously supposed to believe that Miko is the roughest, toughest, dirtiest player in the league? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.