south morocco Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 WHO CARES WE WONT BE ALLOWED TO WIN, WHETHER IT IS BY FAIR OR FOWL:mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Crabbe and Robertson. If only! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please? i'd like to see us going 4-4-2 against them aswell and just go for it! nade and glen for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Crabbe and Robertson. If only! WE WEREN'T ALLOWED TO WIN EVEN WHEN CELTIC WERE NOT A THREAT TO THE GFA THAT OFTEN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamcraigbeattie Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 We all know whats needed but at the end of the day we all know whats gonna happen!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo19 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 mole does enough runing off the ball and nade is good holding it up, think they could be a good partnership or glen and nade. put karipidis in defence for zal and leave stewart and aguiar in centre mid and try 4-4-2. if we want to win games we need to score more and we havent scored many recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Do we even have 2 strikers? It doesn't matter whether we play lone striker or 2 up front if neither of them can put the ball in the back of the net anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please?It will never happen Ian:rolleyes: How's business mate? I saw Rab C last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Do we even have 2 strikers? It doesn't matter whether we play lone striker or 2 up front if neither of them can put the ball in the back of the net anyway what about nade and glen? my team if everybody fit balogh, jonsson, berra, karapidis, wallace, aguiar, stewart, cesnauskas, driver, nade, glen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please? In an ideal world I think we could do well against them with two up front as we'd cope well enough in other areas of the park...but which two? There's a definite improvement in Nade, Mole isn't as bad as some make him out to be but still isn't quite good enough imho, Makela....as a sub if absolutely need be but I think he's even less capable than Mole...Glen hasn't been great recently and while he might well come good for us, I don't think an OF game is the place to chuck him in...not from the start anyway....and Tullberg is still an unknown quantity to all intents and purposes. I just don't know. I said last week at the derby that I would rather have seen Miko come on as a striker than any of the options we had available to us....They work hard but I'm just not convinced that they're goalscorers I suppose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 what about nade and glen? my team if everybody fit balogh, jonsson, berra, karapidis, wallace, aguiar, stewart, cesnauskas, driver, nade, glen It would have to be Glen by proxy. I still *really* don't rate Nade, he's just too reminiscent of past donkey strikers we've had. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 what about nade and glen? my team if everybody fit balogh, jonsson, berra, karapidis, wallace, aguiar, stewart, cesnauskas, driver, nade, glen penalty to celtic glen sent off, thats the way i see it, jeeze we werent allowed to win with the 05/06 team till it was all over by the GFA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 It would have to be Glen by proxy. I still *really* don't rate Nade, he's just too reminiscent of past donkey strikers we've had. he's the best we've got just now though louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grumpyespana Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please? Where are we going to find one striker never mind two, as I have said in the past two strikers are the missing pieces in the jigsaw. Grumpy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letsalllaughathobos Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 what about nade and glen? my team if everybody fit balogh, jonsson, berra, karapidis, wallace, aguiar, stewart, cesnauskas, driver, nade, glen spot on with that team. but i think it ill be the same again. hope he changes it a bit though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 he's the best we've got just now though louise Hmm sad state of affairs, you're right, possibly if Celtic play skinny defenders he could just power straight through them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Hmm sad state of affairs, you're right, possibly if Celtic play skinny defenders he could just power straight through them we all knew we needed to sign a striker before the window shut but our owner didn't get one signed, hopefully come january we'll get a proven goalscorer in though! still think nade could trouble mcmanus and caldwell though louise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Only a Game Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 otherwise we willl lose ,which two i dont know but the one up is rubbish and they will punish us for it ,any two ,i dont care as long as we have a go against them,your thoughts please? I wouldnt !!! For a start we havent got a good enough pairing to give them a serious problem to think about I'd go in there and dominate the centre midfield, because if you do that Celtic do not have enough of a goal threat to trouble you. We've got a good enough midfield pairing to give them a problem and we've got pace in the wide areas if Chesney and Driver start. If we play 2 up we'll end up playing long ball down the throat of McManus and Caldwell. Lets play a bit of football in the middle of the park, keep it safe at the back and see what their defence is like on the deck when people are running at them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 we all knew we needed to sign a striker before the window shut but our owner didn't get one signed, hopefully come january we'll get a proven goalscorer in though! still think nade could trouble mcmanus and caldwell though louise Maybe, still think they're going to be a bit too tricky for him though, different kettle of fish to Jones and Bamba last week. However if Nade comes on and scores a hat trick I will happily admit you were right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Maybe, still think they're going to be a bit too tricky for him though, different kettle of fish to Jones and Bamba last week.However if Nade comes on and scores a hat trick I will happily admit you were right will you buy me a drink? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Louise Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 will you buy me a drink? good one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 good one! :):) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_R Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 i'd like to see us going 4-4-2 against them aswell and just go for it! nade and glen for me. was just thinking that mate. Nade has put in a good shift last few games and I reckon Glen would do a good job feeding off him and nick a few goals. Best option we have at the moment imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 was just thinking that mate. Nade has put in a good shift last few games and I reckon Glen would do a good job feeding off him and nick a few goals. Best option we have at the moment imo. 442 us? Dream on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan_R Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 442 us? Dream on I know its unlikey/never going to happen but imo I think it would definately see us grab a few more goals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 It would be folly to play 2 up front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigwull22 Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 It would be folly to play 2 up front. do we have 2 to play up front, jeeze we've no got 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ampers& Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 I'm all for playing 2 up-top. Nade looks as though he's playing for the shirt and could link up well with another striker. Who though is the conundrum!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Winstone Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 I would love to see us playing 2 up top regularly but not against Celtic next week. From last weeks game and from what I have heard about today it sounds like the 5 man midfield (particularly when Driver comes back) is starting to really click and dominate in games. I would leave it as it is for next week and hope that Nade gets some conditions that adhere to his playing style more than they did today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groot Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 I wouldnt !!! For a start we havent got a good enough pairing to give them a serious problem to think about I'd go in there and dominate the centre midfield, because if you do that Celtic do not have enough of a goal threat to trouble you. We've got a good enough midfield pairing to give them a problem and we've got pace in the wide areas if Chesney and Driver start. If we play 2 up we'll end up playing long ball down the throat of McManus and Caldwell. Lets play a bit of football in the middle of the park, keep it safe at the back and see what their defence is like on the deck when people are running at them. I would love to see us playing 2 up top regularly but not against Celtic next week. From last weeks game and from what I have heard about today it sounds like the 5 man midfield (particularly when Driver comes back) is starting to really click and dominate in games. I would leave it as it is for next week and hope that Nade gets some conditions that adhere to his playing style more than they did today. Was thinking the same thing, if we dominate the midfield we can give them problems especially if Vinegar of Posselbank and Samaras are still injured they're left with a couple of leprachauns and an inexperienced youngster up front Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Libertonian_II Posted October 25, 2008 Share Posted October 25, 2008 Dear Csaba You played Palazuelos and Mikoliunus today, only because you had to. They proved why they are not first team regulars. Can you do same with Gary Glen, then they we won't have to listen all those 'managers' who think he's a player, based on what I don't know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I think that Aguiar and Nade should be the 2 for next week. We are creating more chances with those 2 up front for us (well until they both tire). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I would love to see us playing 2 up top regularly but not against Celtic next week. From last weeks game and from what I have heard about today it sounds like the 5 man midfield (particularly when Driver comes back) is starting to really click and dominate in games. I would leave it as it is for next week and hope that Nade gets some conditions that adhere to his playing style more than they did today. Agreed. 5 accross the middle with Driver and Kingston pushing on is the way to go against Sellick. We don't even have 2 decent strikers to choose from. I'd rather play another midfielder than Makela or Mole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMA MAROON Posted October 26, 2008 Share Posted October 26, 2008 I like the way we play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.