jkato Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 ...Why are we persevering with this failed system? I'm at a loss to fathom out the reasoning. Feel free to add your theories!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 I wonder if there was a single person in the stadium who thought that Ksnavicius coming on was the guy who was going to win the game for us? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Chat Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 I wonder if there was a single person in the stadium who thought that Ksnavicius coming on was the guy who was going to win the game for us? Vlad wasn't in the stadium (shock horror). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Imagine if we could play 4-5-1-1. Ksana would still be that extra man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Bishop Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 ...Why are we persevering with this failed system? I'm at a loss to fathom out the reasoning. Feel free to add your theories!! So we played with 12 men and still got beat!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 We don't play with 1 up front people. We play with none up front. Our lone strikers drift so far wide that Nade even took a throw today. Its a shambles and it has to stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zeeko1 Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 ...Why are we persevering with this failed system? I'm at a loss to fathom out the reasoning. Feel free to add your theories!! My theory is that you cant count Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susie-Jambo-66 Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 ...Why are we persevering with this failed system? I'm at a loss to fathom out the reasoning. Feel free to add your theories!! How many times is this going to come up. We are playing 4-4-2 according to Csaba. Ask Csaba how many he is playing up front and he will tell you 2. This is because he does not see playing 2 up meaning they both have to be in line with each other. Fact. Source: Csaba Laszlo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 How many times is this going to come up. We are playing 4-4-2 according to Csaba. Ask Csaba how many he is playing up front and he will tell you 2. This is because he does not see playing 2 up meaning they both have to be in line with each other. Fact. Source: Csaba Laszlo Ask me and I'll tell you none. I demonstrated the failings of this nonsense 4-4-1-1 formation in the pub today using beermats, bottles and a glass. If Csaba wants to give me a bell I'm more than happy to explain it to him. A lone striker taking a throw in sums up the tactical shambles that we have become. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Vlad wasn't in the stadium (shock horror). there wasn't one member of the board in the directors box mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rods Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Korbatchajob is to blame for me why does he not inform laslo that the same formation with the same team last year finished 8th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Csaba's a mod edit, in that case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sked21 Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Sorry but didn't we start with 4-4-2. And in my opinion it is the worse period of play I have seen this season. It doesn't matter if it is 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, the players aren't good enough for either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Sorry but didn't we start with 4-4-2. And in my opinion it is the worse period of play I have seen this season. It doesn't matter if it is 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, the players aren't good enough for either. Mole was playing ten yards deeper than Tullburg. The only times when either player was even close to being effective was when they ended up with Tullburg deeper than Mole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndyMcI Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Sorry but didn't we start with 4-4-2. And in my opinion it is the worse period of play I have seen this season. It doesn't matter if it is 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, the players aren't good enough for either. This was how i saw it today. Mole started right up front today with Tullberg in a proper 442. This appeared to have the effect on all our players thinking the best thing to do was punt long balls at them. Thought we looked more settled when we went back to 451. Reason being.... If in a 442 the big issue for me is with Karapidis in front of the back 4 sitting really deep and Miko staying wide left, Larry staying wide right that leaves a huge amount of space in the middle for Stewart to deal with himself. In 451 he has a bit of help. Is 451 the answer? I hope not but until we play 2 central midfielders or play Miko and Larry narrow we will struggle with posession and ball winning and get generally overrun through the middle of the park. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rods Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 This was how i saw it today. Mole started right up front today with Tullberg in a proper 442. This appeared to have the effect on all our players thinking the best thing to do was punt long balls at them. Thought we looked more settled when we went back to 451. Reason being.... If in a 442 the big issue for me is with Karapidis in front of the back 4 sitting really deep and Miko staying wide left, Larry staying wide right that leaves a huge amount of space in the middle for Stewart to deal with himself. In 451 he has a bit of help. Is 451 the answer? I hope not but until we play 2 central midfielders or play Miko and Larry narrow we will struggle with posession and ball This is how the second goal was lost today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jerah Jambo Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 ...Why are we persevering with this failed system? I'm at a loss to fathom out the reasoning. Feel free to add your theories!! Because the fax machine said so :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Statto Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 I think we need to play the 4-4-1-1, it isn't the same as 4-5-1, it is similar (but not identical) to 4-4-2. It is a variation that if played correctly can become very successful. When defending, the 4-4-1-1 should look like this; GK RB CD CD LB RM..DM...LM ......CM ..ST1 .....ST2 Tight, solid, compact. when attacking it should change into; GK RB CD CD LB ......DM RM .......CM..LM ..ST1..ST2 Different options, players in the right positions to attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucky Thompson Posted October 4, 2008 Share Posted October 4, 2008 I wasn't going to post!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighusref Posted October 5, 2008 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Sorry but didn't we start with 4-4-2. And in my opinion it is the worse period of play I have seen this season. It doesn't matter if it is 4-4-2 or 4-5-1, the players aren't good enough for either. As stated on another thread, I came in about ten minutes late, but when I arrived we were playing 4-4-1-1. Tullberg was up front on his own, and Mole joined him on occasions. We fleetingly played with two up front yesterday, not regularly enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.