Jump to content

natos doomday seed in artic vault


maroonlegions

Recommended Posts

maroonlegions

feck link not working:eek:, here is some of it below (for dudes that are interested , comedians welcome but must take of masks);)

 

 

 

NATO?s Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic

 

'The controversial ?Doomsday Seed Vault?, a nuclear-bomb-proof vault deep into the side of a mountain in NATO-member Norway?s Svalbard, near the Arctic Circle, has begun to collect seed samples from the entire world to freeze in the newly opened facility. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, have constructed what is called by BBC the ?doomsday seed bank.? Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. It sits on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group. Now scientists connected with the project are roaming the world to collect samples of every seed variety known, using the fraudulent argument of protecting against Global Warming to obtain samples of the crop diversity of the planet. The implications are potentially more dangerous than the threat of nuclear war.'

 

Read more... , try typing in the name of the forum from first post.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions
Another boost to the post count.

 

 

what, :rolleyes:, not interested then , then feel free to make a cup of tea if you like.:cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions
Article not available. Get out of the house ML!!! the SAS'll be round in a minute to shut down your truth telling trouble making...

 

 

 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=home,

 

 

 

:):):), na, think of it this way, there was a old Chinese saying once, "THE FIRST NAIL THAT STICKS OUT OF THE BUNCH IS THE FIRST ONE TO GET HAMMERED.:eek::eek::107years:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The People's Chimp
feck link not working:eek:, here is some of it below (for dudes that are interested , comedians welcome but must take of masks);)

 

 

 

NATO?s Doomsday Seed Vault in the Arctic

 

'The controversial ?Doomsday Seed Vault?, a nuclear-bomb-proof vault deep into the side of a mountain in NATO-member Norway?s Svalbard, near the Arctic Circle, has begun to collect seed samples from the entire world to freeze in the newly opened facility. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with the Rockefeller Foundation, Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta Foundation and the Government of Norway, among others, have constructed what is called by BBC the ?doomsday seed bank.? Officially the project is named the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. It sits on the Norwegian island of Spitsbergen, part of the Svalbard island group. Now scientists connected with the project are roaming the world to collect samples of every seed variety known, using the fraudulent argument of protecting against Global Warming to obtain samples of the crop diversity of the planet. The implications are potentially more dangerous than the threat of nuclear war.'

 

Read more... , try typing in the name of the forum from first post.:rolleyes:

 

What is your issue with a seed bank? Really. Other than the spin of some washed out freak, what is the problem with a seed bank?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions
What is your issue with a seed bank? Really. Other than the spin of some washed out freak, what is the problem with a seed bank?

 

did you read it and how is he some washed out freak, so you think it not a concern that major flaws have been found , toxic harm to the body, really if you cant see it then so be it but in maybe 5 or ten years watch the veg you are eating.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions
What is your issue with a seed bank? Really. Other than the spin of some washed out freak, what is the problem with a seed bank?

 

 

 

In reality, as it years later emerged, the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme to develop a globalized agribusiness which they then could monopolize just as they had done in the world oil industry beginning a half century before. As Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970?s, ?If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population.?

 

Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went hand-in-hand. They were part of a grand strategy which included Rockefeller Foundation financing of research for the development of genetic engineering of plants and animals a few years later.:eek:

 

John H. Davis had been Assistant Agriculture Secretary under President Dwight Eisenhower in the early 1950?s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an agriculture expert in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956, Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review in which he declared that ?the only way to solve the so-called farm problem once and for all, and avoid cumbersome government programs, is to progress from agriculture to agribusiness.? He knew precisely what he had in mind, though few others had a clue back then--- a revolution in agriculture production that would concentrate control of the food chain in corporate multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer.3

 

 

 

nothing to be alarmed about then:rolleyes::cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sexton Hardcastle

8 of the 12 (now 13) posts in this thread are urs. I think you should be making the tea and watchin telly son.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In reality, as it years later emerged, the Green Revolution was a brilliant Rockefeller family scheme to develop a globalized agribusiness which they then could monopolize just as they had done in the world oil industry beginning a half century before. As Henry Kissinger declared in the 1970?s, ?If you control the oil you control the country; if you control food, you control the population.?

 

Agribusiness and the Rockefeller Green Revolution went hand-in-hand. They were part of a grand strategy which included Rockefeller Foundation financing of research for the development of genetic engineering of plants and animals a few years later.:eek:

 

John H. Davis had been Assistant Agriculture Secretary under President Dwight Eisenhower in the early 1950?s. He left Washington in 1955 and went to the Harvard Graduate School of Business, an unusual place for an agriculture expert in those days. He had a clear strategy. In 1956, Davis wrote an article in the Harvard Business Review in which he declared that ?the only way to solve the so-called farm problem once and for all, and avoid cumbersome government programs, is to progress from agriculture to agribusiness.? He knew precisely what he had in mind, though few others had a clue back then--- a revolution in agriculture production that would concentrate control of the food chain in corporate multinational hands, away from the traditional family farmer.3

 

 

 

nothing to be alarmed about then:rolleyes::cool:

 

If you are going to consistently copy and paste other peoples work you should have the decency to credit your source.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why add smilies when you paste it too? It's like when The Sun puts words in bold and capitals, as if to go "You're stupid and THIS IS THE BIT YOU SHOULD BE PAYING ATTENTION TO!"

 

Annoying and patronising as ****.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are going to consistently copy and paste other peoples work you should have the decency to credit your source.

 

And how do we know that it is not your work? Because it is in sentences and the words are spelt correctly.

 

If you tried to construct sentences and checked your spelling then someone might take you seriously. I doubt it, though.

 

And no, before you ask I am not an English teacher, which is your standard response. We have a language, we have some rules. They are there so that people can communicate with less likelihood of misunderstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maroonlegions
What is your issue with a seed bank? Really. Other than the spin of some washed out freak, what is the problem with a seed bank?

 

 

 

 

Unofficially, the Seed Vault project is one of the largest steps taken yet by the handful of GMO agribusiness giants including Monsanto Corporation, Syngenta of Basle, the Rockefeller Foundation in addition to the Gates family foundation, the world?s largest private foundation combining the wealth as well of Warren Buffett. As I described in an earlier piece posted January 3, 2008 in this space, Der ?Tresor des J?ngsten Gerichts? in der Arktis(((THOMAS Can we make a link here??))), the project appears to be far from the innocent humanitarian enterprise its promoters claim. The key organizations involved have a long, often dirty history of fraud, intimidation and dubious methods to force the spread of patented Genetically Modified plant seeds into the world agriculture food chain.

 

 

 

Readers seeking a more detailed background on the GMO companies, the so-called Four Horsemen of the Seeds Apokalypse?Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow Chemical and DuPont?are encouraged to look further in my book, Saat der Zerst?rung: die Dunkle Seite der Gen-Manipulation ((( Here a Hyperlink as well to book))) . There I describe the decades long background of the Rockefeller Foundation, working in close concert with Monsanto and others to create the scientifically flawed technology of introducing foreign traits into the seeds of the world?s main food crops and thereby claiming grounds for exclusive patent rights to sell seeds of corn, rice, potato varieties, soybeans and countless other basic crops including cotton. GMO is a scientifically unstable technique whose long-term health impact on humans or even animals has never been independently tested by any Government.

 

 

 

That is a result of deliberate US policy, initiated in 1992 by then-President George H. W. Bush in consultation with top officials of Monsanto.;) Then Bush signed an Executive decree mandating the responsible Federal agencies such as the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration and others NOT to independently test the genetically modified seeds for possible harmful effects, but to consider them to be ?Substantially Equivalent? to conventional corn, soybeans, rice and such. That political fraud allowed Monsanto to submit GMO seed varieties for approval to plant commercially using only Monsanto-conducted test results as ?proof? that the seeds were safe. That was only the beginning of a policy of malign neglect on the side of the US Government regarding the dangers of GMO.

 

 

 

Toxic for human embryos

 

 

 

Compounding the dangers, the US Government also refused to examine, independently, the possible harmful effects to ground water and to humans and animals of the patented chemical herbicides which had to be sold alongside the Monsanto or DuPont or other GMO seeds. The seeds were patented in effect to force farmers to buy exclusively the herbicide of the seed patent owner.;)

 

 

 

As an example, Monsanto initially held patent rights to a powerful herbicide, Roundup?, which today is the world?s most used herbicide. Monsanto developed and patented a soybean seed it names Roundup Ready?. Roudup Ready soybeans are ?ready? for the Roundup herbicide. The Monsanto soybean is specially developed to be resistant to Roundup herbicide, a powerful poison that kills everything it touches. That pairing of herbicide and seed gives companies promoting the GMO product a lock on both sale of patented seeds as well as their mated herbicide chemicals. All major GMO seed giants started out as chemical companies.

 

 

 

More alarming is the fact that, according to numerous studies worldwide, GMO crops over time need more, not less, herbicide as the weeds develop a special resistance to become ?superweeds?.

 

 

 

Then a scientific study that has to date been blocked out of the public debate, suggests that the active elements in the world?s largest-selling herbicide, Monsanto?s Roundup, are toxic and get into ground water and into the human diet. The study found that Roundup had a measurable effect on human embryonic and placental cells.

 

 

 

The scientific study, released in the magazine, Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology in November 2006 by a group of scientists headed by N. Benachour and G. E. Seralini of the University of Caen in France, following extensive tests with rats fed a diet of plants treated with Roundup, whose active ingredient is Glyphosate, that ?we can conclude that the failure to account for the combined effects?will undoubtedly lead to the underestimation of potential hazards, especially at the endocrine disruption level, and hence to erroneous conclusions at a regulatory level regarding the risk that they provoke.? The scientists concluded, ?Thus the toxic or hormonal impact of chemical mixtures in formulations (of Roundup?w.e.) appears to be underestimated.? Moreover, the Caen University scientists found that the toxic effects of Roundup were ?thus amplified with time. Taken together, these data suggest that Roundup exposure may effect human reproduction and fetal development in case of contamination.?[1]

 

 

 

The last statement, translated into layman?s language is that the world?s most popular herbicide has manifest impact on human embryo cells and no Government is moving to call for a ban on its sale pending larger more thorough independent tests. The scientific article was buried and no one outside a tiny scientific community even knew the alarming results.

 

 

sounds like and is pointing too control of the populace and farmers by making it impossible to not buy their GM seeds , once the natural seeds are no longer available or taken out of the system then bingo they have out right control of farmers and what we eat, control the oil then you control the worlds money, control the food and you control the farmers and population, makes sense but what do i know eh.:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The People's Chimp
did you read it and how is he some washed out freak, so you think it not a concern that major flaws have been found , toxic harm to the body, really if you cant see it then so be it but in maybe 5 or ten years watch the veg you are eating.:rolleyes:

 

If you're on about GM; are you really saying that no media sources have highlighted concerns over GM?

 

Your posts are just ludicrous. Many people in many different ways have expressed concern about Gm and now because you read some scare story about it, 5-10 years too late I may add, it's some hushed up super conspiracy. For christ;s sake even prince jugs of wales has been moaning about GM. I thought the royal family were all reptilian illuminati! So what is he doing voicing concern about this? surely a toxic seedbank would be in his interests!

 

btw: the word "doomsday" refers to the fact that it's bomb proof and if we did have a nuclear armageddon then, after this particular doomsday we may have a way of reviving the planet through a store of seeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The People's Chimp

NEWS JUST IN:

Herbicide may damage plants and animals.

 

NEWS JUST IN:

Multinational coprorations are bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...