7628mm Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Samster Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 This is a personal opinion but I have absolutely no idea why this would be of any interest to anyone whatsoever. It's just the number on the back of a shirt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footieman Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Everybody loves Baz Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? Does it make anyone play better ?? Maybe Csaba feels he doesn't want to been seen having a favourite Goalie/Striker ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielw85 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Is Tullberg not number 9? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casenauskis Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Is Tullberg not number 9? Tullberg is indeed no9 and hibs dont have a no1 either? maka-LAMEby is 50 and there sub is something else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footieman Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Is Tullberg not number 9? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GhostHunter Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 If the number 25 keeps saving the ball from going in the net, and the number 19 keeps scoring goals, does it really matter that we don't have a number 1 or 9 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambomo Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 As said above it really doesn't make a difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Examiner Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 As said above it really doesn't make a difference Other than numerically, when you add it all up I suppose. Numbers can be important - :107years: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gershwin Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 And that Pospisil was a breath of fresh air at no. 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToadKiller Dog Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 the hobos have a rat wearing 01 , unless the gfa have changed the rules so they can fine us ?10,000 for not having a no 1 shirt then dont see the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Has anyone informed the President? Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upthehill Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Thank goodness Tullberg is #9, I'd be really worried about not having one of them! Seriously though, I'd much prefer going back to the good old days of 1-11 starting the game without names on their backs aswell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Seriously though, I'd much prefer going back to the good old days of 1-11 starting the game without names on their backs aswell. It's nothing but a money making scheme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Brow Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? There has been a press conference called for 4pm today. Vlad personally thanks you for pointing this out. Even if it is incorrect. But dont let little things like facts get in the way. Your post cant possibly be serious can it? On a side note I take it that your absolutely bricking it that the players havent been paid? Not getting any sleep over the fact that our team is the youngest in the SPL but H.A.N.S thinks we dont play enough youth? What is wrong with people today? Endless threads about nowt! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedbump Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? Some folk will moan about anything:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Susie-Jambo-66 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 A very prolific poster asked the same question about why no number 1 in the squad a while back. The responses he got were very different from the ones today. Suppose its all about who asks the question..... But as said by many today it makes absolutely no difference to a players performance what number they have on their back. I think Kello (25) has proved that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Do The Dance Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Liverpool's number 1 is Diego Cavelieri. It's just a number really... We went into this season without a recognised number 1. Perhaps psychologically it's good to keep the number free to allow the 2(3) keepers to fight it out for the jersey next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 It's nothing but a money making scheme. I am pretty scared now as I find myself agreeing with you DH!!! Let us never talk about this again;) At least we dont bring out umpteen new strips a season!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? The number on the back of someone's shirt is totally irrelevant. I would rather have a quality striker wearing 55 on his back than a s h i t centre forward wearing number 9, just so we were using that number and conforming to some sort of expected numbering system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Gosling Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Balogh was to get number 1 but asked for 12, quite simply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffalo Bill Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 ...and Banksie has simply proven that wearing number 13 is unlucky. Buffalo Bill . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The People's Chimp Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N User Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Did Niemi ever wear the #1 for Hearts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kissthebadge Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? Craig Gordon still hasn't washed & returned the strip. It's currently lying on a utility room floor somewhere in the North East of England next to Jamie Mole's shooting boots. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbo27_22 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Some people have very simple lives if this is all they have to worry them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboj Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 The only time this subject deserves any thought is during Championship Manager, where its a very important part of my season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJGJ Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 They've been sold to alleviate the crisis afflicting our club -- just that nobody has told the fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackJAC? Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 It's like worrying about whether or not you've watered the plants whilst the hoose is on fire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Craig Gordon still hasn't washed & returned the strip. It's currently lying on a utility room floor somewhere in the North East of England next to Jamie Mole's shooting boots. . Jamie Moles GOT shooting boots????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
speedbump Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Jamie Moles GOT shooting boots????? I hope they're better than clums dancing shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearts_crazy Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Oh my God!!!! No number 1 or 9 Feck me, whatever next. Seriously though who gives a flying feck???? Talk about irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosewood Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Haha, class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi must stay Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 I am a little concerned why HMFC still have no number 1 or 9 in the 1st team squad. http://www.heartsfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/FirstTeam/0,,10289,00.html I do appreciate that Chabba did not have a great deal of time to sort things out before the start of the season but to go into a campaign without these squad numbers is surely a 1st in scottish football. Are HMFC going to address this anytime soon? Is this part and parcel of the way our club is run now? don't think numbers mean much to clubs. most players go to a club and ask for a number they've worn before which is fair enough imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin67 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Liverpool's number 1 is Diego Cavelieri. It's just a number really... We went into this season without a recognised number 1. Perhaps psychologically it's good to keep the number free to allow the 2(3) keepers to fight it out for the jersey next season. I think if there is no recognised 1st choice keeper, then the no. 1 jersey shouldn't be allocated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboRossi79 Posted September 23, 2008 Share Posted September 23, 2008 Liverpool's number 1 is Diego Cavelieri. It's just a number really... We went into this season without a recognised number 1. Perhaps psychologically it's good to keep the number free to allow the 2(3) keepers to fight it out for the jersey next season. ...and Chelsea have Franco Di Santo as No. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.