Charlie-Brown Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 http://sport.scotsman.com/football/Unused-Glen-told-he-must.4481144.jp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 If we are to stick with the stinking 4-5-1 formation I would prefer to see Glen in the hole rather than anyone else who has played there so far this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambobrett Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 http://sport.scotsman.com/football/Unused-Glen-told-he-must.4481144.jp Think Csaba's right to be honest. No reason why Glen should be put straight back in. Mole hasn't been brilliant, but there has been a marked improvement and it can't be easy playing the lone striker role. Personally i would prefer to see us drop a midfielder, probably Larry or maybe Obua, and bring in another striker. Alternatively, with Glen's movement he could be the perfect man to play behind the front man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 As long as Csaba is producing results, I don't care who he picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambof3tornado Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 Was Glen not just used as a PR stunt last season to give us something to cheer about in dire times?? He will come good for us,but he is a year or 2 away from being a regular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 If we are to stick with the stinking 4-5-1 formation I would prefer to see Glen in the hole rather than anyone else who has played there so far this season. It is 4-4-1-1, the same as most successful European teams play. We need to generate a playing style and I would stick with this for now. I can see it starting to take shape although Rome wasn't built in a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 It is 4-4-1-1, the same as most successful European teams play. We need to generate a playing style and I would stick with this for now. I can see it starting to take shape although Rome wasn't built in a day. 4-3-2-1 might be closer to how the successful teams play, particularly with the wide front players getting as far forward as the striker much of the time. We don't play like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
We_are_the_Hearts Posted September 11, 2008 Share Posted September 11, 2008 4-3-2-1 might be closer to how the successful teams play, particularly with the wide front players getting as far forward as the striker much of the time. We don't play like that. Would have to disagree. The above formation means 3 in the centre of midfield. More and More teams are now playing with 2 in the middle, wide midfielders, a hole player and a striker. The 2 wide players cut in leaving space for the full backs and 1 of the 2 in the middle drops back. Formation wise it has the most flexibility and can be hard to defend against. We need a better hole player though. We should keep working at this even though results will be inconsistent in the short term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.