Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Watt-Zeefuik
Posted (edited)

Gordon - 7 - Little to do, no drama

Forrester - 5 - Very shaky first half, settled in the second. Needs to move the ball faster

Steinwender - 7 - Solid performance, few mistakes.

Neilson - 6 - Not great on the ball but after some early passiveness did little wrong

Penrice - 7 - Not the kind of game breaking he's done before but all over the pitch

Beni - 8 - MotM. Brilliant out there, great pass for the first

Kartum - 6 - County suffocated the space he wanted to play into, but he rarely shook loose to do much

Spittal - 7 - One bad free kick but worked hard on that side.

Shankland - 8 - Best game from him in a while. No shots to speak of but he was everywhere.

Wilson - 6 - Gave Lapata nightmares, stood up to his bullying. Should have shot instead of cutting back early in the second.

Kabangu - 7 - Great run and shot for the first, but FFS man GET BACK ONSIDE

 

Subs:

Musa - 6 - Great ball in for the second

Nieuwenhoff - 5 - Improved the team once he slotted back into the 4-2-3-1

Forrest - 3 - I hate being down but . . . just . . . let's move on

Grant - 7 - Would have been MotM had he played that way the whole game

 

 

Edited by Watt-Zeefuik
  • Replies 135
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Martin B

    20

  • Watt-Zeefuik

    11

  • Bob Loblaw

    4

  • GinRummy

    4

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

hearts00
Posted

Solid enough without anything spectacular. Jorge Grant was superb when he came on. 
 

Thought Shanks was good today and worked hard. 
 

The diamond has to go though. It really does. We completely lack control of the match with it and we are clearly not going to play it in some of the upcoming bigger matches, well I certainly hope not. So Critch come on bin it.  

colinmaroon
Posted

Messy 7 - Great contribution.  Laid on 2nd, unlucky not to score, great defensive cover.

hmfc_liam06
Posted

Meh 6’s all round.

MR INCREDIBLE
Posted

Musa caused havoc when he came on!

Deserves to start !!!

 

Martin B
Posted
19 minutes ago, Watt-Zeefuik said:

Shankland - 8 - Best game from him in a while. No shots to speak of but he was everywhere.


:rofl:

:rofl:

:rofl:

 

Honestly GTF! 

Bad Religion
Posted

5’s across the board as we won. As average a performance as you’re ever likely to see. 

Another Robbo
Posted

Not sure how Gordon got one of the man of the match awards, so little to do.

Ricardo Quaresma
Posted

Need to be a whole level or 2 better next week

 

 

 

Hopefully sevco take something Tomorrow or guess what can happen next week, right on schedule?

 

 

 

Some 5h1t passing and faffing about today, against a team that showed absolutely nothing, on a knife-edge until the 2nd

Pasquale for King
Posted

Shankland an 8 ffs 🤪

ManxandCapeTownJambo
Posted
7 minutes ago, Martin B said:


:rofl:

:rofl:

:rofl:

 

Honestly GTF! 

 

I thought he had a great game personally 

Controlled the ball well and played some great incisive passes , never gave the ball away and worked hard

Not sure what game you were watching

Posted

Beni -8

everyone else -6

Shankland an 8 😂,what *** game are you watching.

gwd1957
Posted
2 minutes ago, stevie said:

Beni -8

everyone else -6

Shankland an 8 😂,what *** game are you watching.

Play like that against the Irish mob and we'll get battered.

Martin B
Posted
1 minute ago, ManxandCapeTownJambo said:

 

I thought he had a great game personally 

Controlled the ball well and played some great incisive passes , never gave the ball away and worked hard

Not sure what game you were watching


Depends what you’re expecting the player on your team with the free role to do. For me a player with a free role has to either be pinging in goals or sliding through balls to create goals. I have zero interest in a no10 dropping back into our own half flicking the ball about.

colinmaroon
Posted
1 minute ago, Martin B said:


Depends what you’re expecting the player on your team with the free role to do. For me a player with a free role has to either be pinging in goals or sliding through balls to create goals. I have zero interest in a no10 dropping back into our own half flicking the ball about.

 

He did a lot more than that.

 

 

Peakybunnet
Posted
18 minutes ago, Martin B said:


:rofl:

:rofl:

:rofl:

 

Honestly GTF! 

Thought he played well also

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
38 minutes ago, Watt-Zeefuik said:

Forrester - 5 - Very shaky first half, settled in the second. Needs to move the ball faster

Completely agree with this. Hesistant and slow on the ball. 

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
7 minutes ago, stevie said:

Beni -8

everyone else -6

Shankland an 8 😂,what *** game are you watching.

hes right 

image-23-10-21-06-58-16.gif

merrymac
Posted
27 minutes ago, MR INCREDIBLE said:

Musa caused havoc when he came on!

Deserves to start !!!

 

100% this 👍

Posted

Beni a clear two points ahead of everyone else today. 

Posted (edited)

First game I've been to this calendar year in person. Generally thought everyone was a 6 or 7 in the main. A few 5s.

 

Beni a standout at 8 or 9. Grant was great when he came on too.

 

Was genuinely shocked as I've defended him and it doesn't look it on TV but in the flesh Shankland is clearly quite considerably overweight

Edited by Taffin
Gavman81
Posted
27 minutes ago, Martin B said:


:rofl:

:rofl:

:rofl:

 

Honestly GTF! 

He did play well - hearts telly calling out his contribution - fairs fair he’s been awful but he linked play well today , played a number of good passes , got involved and worked hard

upgotheheads
Posted

I thought Shanks had his best  game of the season playing as a midfielder.  Beni was immense too, 8 for them. Kabangu 7 for his goal alone and Wilson 7 for all round effort. Steinwnder  8. The rest of the starters 6, and a 6 for Musa. I'd  like yo see him gat a start more  often.

GarryJ-o-s
Posted

Steinwender man of the match on Flashscore and Whoscored

GinRummy
Posted
34 minutes ago, ManxandCapeTownJambo said:

 

I thought he had a great game personally 

Controlled the ball well and played some great incisive passes , never gave the ball away and worked hard

Not sure what game you were watching

That’s because you’ve been backing him and have lost the ability to be impartial. It’s like folk kidding on Barrie McKay was doing well because they had previously said he was a great player. 

john thomas
Posted
26 minutes ago, Taffin said:

First game I've been to this calendar year in person. Generally thought everyone was a 6 or 7 in the main. A few 5s.

 

Beni a standout at 8 or 9. Grant was great when he came on too.

 

Was genuinely shocked as I've defended him and it doesn't look it on TV but in the flesh Shankland is clearly quite considerably overweight

Covers a lot of ground (spare me) for someone who is so overweight and unfit 

Philfigo
Posted

Kabangu was dreadful with the exemption of his goal. 1st touch is very poor, can't jump to head a ball, for his size is way to easy pushed off the ball, his finishing is terrible other than when its instictive ans doesnt need to take a touch of the ball and his positional sense is awful. Other than that he is not bad just hope we don't wate any money on even attempting to buy him.

Posted
Just now, john thomas said:

Covers a lot of ground (spare me) for someone who is so overweight and unfit 

 

He does. Doesn't cover particularly much for a professional footballer though, at least not at much velocity. Still played pretty well today though.

Jamb04life
Posted

Beni the standout once again.
Everyone else was average in what was a poor game. Thought Kabangu was below par apart from his goal

 

Special shout out to Musa and Grant who added a bit of a spark. What Musa did for Grants goal is exactly what we need and have been missing 

Steve Bracknall
Posted

I’d have marked Shankland as a 7/10.

 

The OP getting some amount of grief for marking him a notch higher 🤷🏼‍♂️

 

I thought he played well. 

 

We need better at right back centre half than Forrester and Neilson. Which I’m sure will happen come the Summer

maltese jambo
Posted

Musa was hungry when he came on. Good.

 

Far too much slack play and we really need to step up a gear or two in general.

Martin B
Posted
22 minutes ago, GinRummy said:

That’s because you’ve been backing him and have lost the ability to be impartial. It’s like folk kidding on Barrie McKay was doing well because they had previously said he was a great player. 


:spoton:

TynecastleBC5
Posted

Genuine question as I can't make my mind up...

 

Would anyone give Grant a new contract even if it's as a squad player next season? With Jamestown involved there can be no loyalty to players as we are aiming to improve in every position when we can. In most of our minds he isn't what we need for trying to push the old firm or having a good go in europe, hence squad player.

 

Starting playing very well for us but in the "playing his arse off for a new contract" category unfortunately which is a grey area.

Gavman81
Posted
12 minutes ago, Philfigo said:

Kabangu was dreadful with the exemption of his goal. 1st touch is very poor, can't jump to head a ball, for his size is way to easy pushed off the ball, his finishing is terrible other than when its instictive ans doesnt need to take a touch of the ball and his positional sense is awful. Other than that he is not bad just hope we don't wate any money on even attempting to buy him.

Yeah, let’s not keep the man that has scored 8 goals for us since mid Jan with a range of excellent finishes who could get better and improve with more coaching and better players around him.


That would be foolish in the extreme 

 

Martin B
Posted

Genuinely don’t get the Shankland views from others. Considering he has a free role to stroll about the pitch as he desires, what does he actually contribute? Can’t think of a single chance he contributed to today. A Kartum/Shanda/Spittal given the same level of freedom would be much more potent.

The Treasurer
Posted
1 hour ago, Watt-Zeefuik said:

Gordon - 7 - Little to do, no drama

Forrester - 5 - Very shaky first half, settled in the second. Needs to move the ball faster

Steinwender - 7 - Solid performance, few mistakes.

Neilson - 6 - Not great on the ball but after some early passiveness did little wrong

Penrice - 7 - Not the kind of game breaking he's done before but all over the pitch

Beni - 8 - MotM. Brilliant out there, great pass for the first

Kartum - 6 - County suffocated the space he wanted to play into, but he rarely shook loose to do much

Spittal - 7 - One bad free kick but worked hard on that side.

Shankland - 8 - Best game from him in a while. No shots to speak of but he was everywhere.

Wilson - 6 - Gave Lapata nightmares, stood up to his bullying. Should have shot instead of cutting back early in the second.

Kabangu - 7 - Great run and shot for the first, but FFS man GET BACK ONSIDE

 

Subs:

Musa - 6 - Great ball in for the second

Nieuwenhoff - 5 - Improved the team once he slotted back into the 4-2-3-1

Forrest - 3 - I hate being down but . . . just . . . let's move on

Grant - 7 - Would have been MotM had he played that way the whole game

 

 

Can't disagree with anything you say.

Watt-Zeefuik
Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, Steve Bracknall said:

I’d have marked Shankland as a 7/10.

 

The OP getting some amount of grief for marking him a notch higher 🤷🏼‍♂️

 

I thought he played well. 

 

We need better at right back centre half than Forrester and Neilson. Which I’m sure will happen come the Summer

I’m happy to say 8 was too high. Was writing in a hurry and feeling good after the win.

 

But folk who can’t see he had a good game are those who’ve given up on him. Shanks was one of two players making any successful creative passes in the first half.

Edited by Watt-Zeefuik
Philfigo
Posted
7 minutes ago, Gavman81 said:

Yeah, let’s not keep the man that has scored 8 goals for us since mid Jan with a range of excellent finishes who could get better and improve with more coaching and better players around him.


That would be foolish in the extreme 

 

Football is game of opinions mate! You could counter goals scored by saying easy chances missed outways goals scored. Would another striker in his position have scored more with all the chances he has had. 

Swanny17
Posted

Gordon - 6

Forrester - 5

Neilson - 6

Steinwender - 6

Penrice - 6

Beni - 8

Spittal - 5

Kartum - 5

Shankland - 5

Kabangu - 6

Wilson - 6


Grant - 7

Musa - 7

Forrest - 4

Hoff - 5

Bad Religion
Posted
2 minutes ago, Martin B said:

Genuinely don’t get the Shankland views from others. Considering he has a free role to stroll about the pitch as he desires, what does he actually contribute? Can’t think of a single chance he contributed to today. A Kartum/Shanda/Spittal given the same level of freedom would be much more potent.


He was involved in one of Wilson’s shots from around the edge of the box. Wilson didn’t really get any power behind it but had it gone in would have been a Shankland assist. 
 

The pass was what would be expected of a player playing in his position at this level, nothing more. 

Posted
Just now, Swanny17 said:

Gordon - 6

Forrester - 5

Neilson - 6

Steinwender - 6

Penrice - 6

Beni - 8

Spittal - 5

Kartum - 5

Shankland - 5

Kabangu - 6

Wilson - 6


Grant - 7

Musa - 7

Forrest - 4

Hoff - 5

Spot on Swanny 👍

Gavman81
Posted
Just now, Philfigo said:

Football is game of opinions mate! You could counter goals scored by saying easy chances missed outways goals scored. Would another striker in his position have scored more with all the chances he has had. 

I get it bud but he’s good at this level.

 

Appreciate he could do better at times but wouldn’t be at Hearts in that instance.

 

Confident he’ll get 10 + goals and if stays , only get better with better quality around him and coaching work 👍

Martin B
Posted
1 minute ago, Swanny17 said:

Gordon - 6

Forrester - 5

Neilson - 6

Steinwender - 6

Penrice - 6

Beni - 8

Spittal - 5

Kartum - 5

Shankland - 5

Kabangu - 6

Wilson - 6


Grant - 7

Musa - 7

Forrest - 4

Hoff - 5


Steinwender was much better than a 6. That apart you’re pretty much spot on.

 

Right now we’re winning in spite of the starting lineup and formation rather because of it. 

Posted

Beni and Steinwender the stand outs and thought Grant (scoring or not) played well when he came on. The families of Kartum and Steinwender were enjoying their afternoon and seemed to enjoy taking pics and videos, especially of the ultras, trying to sing along 🇱🇻

Philfigo
Posted
2 minutes ago, Gavman81 said:

I get it bud but he’s good at this level.

 

Appreciate he could do better at times but wouldn’t be at Hearts in that instance.

 

Confident he’ll get 10 + goals and if stays , only get better with better quality around him and coaching work 👍

You are spot on there mate, bit like if Barrie Mckay didn't have the heart of a mouse he would have been playing at far higher level than us. If Kabangu and at least show better awareness/positional sense then that's a good start. I hope he turns out to be shit hot and I am clueless.

Watt-Zeefuik
Posted
5 minutes ago, Martin B said:

Genuinely don’t get the Shankland views from others. Considering he has a free role to stroll about the pitch as he desires, what does he actually contribute? Can’t think of a single chance he contributed to today. A Kartum/Shanda/Spittal given the same level of freedom would be much more potent.

 

There were three midfielders in the diamond in front of Beni, including Shanks, all of them trying to find room in that County defence. It doesn't feel accurate to say County "parked the bus" as they were very active on defence swarming around the ball on the wings and suffocating any kind of passes back across the middle. Spittal tried to do his link-up with Penrice and aside from a few bursts of energy it didn't come off at all. Kartum disappeared entirely from the game with the exceptions of a few times on the counter when he found some space.

 

Shanks, on the other hand, was constantly carving out bits of space and receiving the ball. He was unlucky not to have at least one assist, with the best chance of the first half aside from the goal coming with him playing Wilson into space in the box. When County pressed us, it was often him recovering the ball or pulling it out of trouble and keeping possession.

 

Was it a true #10 performance where he moved about and constantly played defence-splitting passes? No, it was not. But in a game dragged into the mud by their very active, stodgy defence (seriously, some credit to Cowie there) he played the creative mid role we needed.

JamboRossi79
Posted

Usual FotMob ratings based on stats alone

 

Gordon 7.6

Forrester 7.2

Neilson 7.4

Steinwender 8.6 🌟 man

Penrice 7.4

Kartum 6.8

Baningime 8.4

Spittal 7.3

Shankland 8.0

Wilson 6.3

Kabangu 7.3

 

Nieuwenhof 6.3

Grant 7.9

Forrest 6.1

Drammeh 7.0

Watt-Zeefuik
Posted
7 minutes ago, Philfigo said:

Football is game of opinions mate! You could counter goals scored by saying easy chances missed outways goals scored. Would another striker in his position have scored more with all the chances he has had. 

 

We have had plenty of strikers at Hearts who never would have gotten themselves into the space to get the chances that Kabangu missed.

 

He does need improvement, particularly on offside awareness (FFS) and technique around the goal. But the raw material there is outstanding in terms of his speed, strength, and work rate. But, to hammer on an old saw, if he were better he never would have been available from USG.

Martin B
Posted
4 minutes ago, Watt-Zeefuik said:

 

There were three midfielders in the diamond in front of Beni, including Shanks, all of them trying to find room in that County defence. It doesn't feel accurate to say County "parked the bus" as they were very active on defence swarming around the ball on the wings and suffocating any kind of passes back across the middle. Spittal tried to do his link-up with Penrice and aside from a few bursts of energy it didn't come off at all. Kartum disappeared entirely from the game with the exceptions of a few times on the counter when he found some space.

 

Shanks, on the other hand, was constantly carving out bits of space and receiving the ball. He was unlucky not to have at least one assist, with the best chance of the first half aside from the goal coming with him playing Wilson into space in the box. When County pressed us, it was often him recovering the ball or pulling it out of trouble and keeping possession.

 

Was it a true #10 performance where he moved about and constantly played defence-splitting passes? No, it was not. But in a game dragged into the mud by their very active, stodgy defence (seriously, some credit to Cowie there) he played the creative mid role we needed.


Which begs the questions:

 

1. Why are we playing a striker in the creative midfield role?

 

2. Could a natural attacking midfielder make more of playing in that position?

 

The answers for me are:

1. God knows!

2. Of course!

the posh bit
Posted
1 hour ago, MR INCREDIBLE said:

Musa caused havoc when he came on!

Deserves to start !!!

 


Musa should be starting ahead of Shankland.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...