Cruyff Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 48 minutes ago, Taffin said: Not sure I agree about that bit in bold. It's just as grey as football, and certainly when it comes to things the TMO gets involved in at times. It's also not used for every decision, only at tries and for possible foul play. For football, in my opinion offsides within the margin of error should be left as whatever the on field decision was. If the referee makes a clear and obvious error when he has made a decision, VAR should point it out to him and he should review it on the field imo. If he misses something completely then then the opposition should be allowed to make a challenge. Again, just imo. Maybe we should only use it for offsides. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Daddy Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 7 minutes ago, Cruyff said: Maybe we should only use it for offsides. I thought (down south) it was used for 'goals' and 'penalty' decisions only? Might be wrong... If it was to be used up here, i also think it should be used for straight reds (even if missed by the ref). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 I wonder why it's taking so long for him to be getting offered a ban. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Kidd Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Updated now. Hearing on the 9th March https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theshed Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Walter Kidd said: Updated now. Hearing on the 9th March https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ Probably be out the Hamilton game now when we need a hibs win Not that he’s any good anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallas Green Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 23 minutes ago, Walter Kidd said: Updated now. Hearing on the 9th March https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ I notice on that list the Hamilton lad who was sent off against us had his red card rescinded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DETTY29 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 26 minutes ago, Walter Kidd said: Updated now. Hearing on the 9th March https://www.scottishfa.co.uk/scottish-fa/football-governance/disciplinary/disciplinary-updates/ So as a formal notice of complaint has been issued Clancy has said he didnt see it and all 3 ex refs believe it should have been a red card? Really should be an open and shut case however..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Beni of Gorgie Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 37 minutes ago, theshed said: Probably be out the Hamilton game now when we need a hibs win Not that he’s any good anyway Alanis Morrisette could not have written things better. Sounds radical, but I really do think such bans should be served against the team that you committed the crime. Of course some bans may never be served, a bit of a double whammy on this occasion (though of course result was never in doubt) he is allowed to continue against the victim of the crime and is banned further compounding the victims set of circumstances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey1874 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 That's a change. Normally you get offered a ban and hearing only happens if you don't accept it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Daddy Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 minute ago, Mikey1874 said: That's a change. Normally you get offered a ban and hearing only happens if you don't accept it. Why do the SFA use the term 'offered' a ban, like, it's their choice.... how about naw - yer banned! End of! PRRRR****CCCKK! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Apprentice Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 29 minutes ago, Dallas Green said: I notice on that list the Hamilton lad who was sent off against us had his red card rescinded. And Clancy was the referee who sent him off! Really keeping his chums at Hampden busy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Internet Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Cruyff said: Maybe we should only use it for offsides. Offsides have been the most shambolic. Some of them weren't even offside. Plus you'd need actual technology and not just some boy looking at a replay since it's literally impossible to tell if a player was offside at the precise instant the ball was kicked in a lot of cases. It's so bad. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 40 minutes ago, Sir Gio said: Alanis Morrisette could not have written things better. Sounds radical, but I really do think such bans should be served against the team that you committed the crime. Of course some bans may never be served, a bit of a double whammy on this occasion (though of course result was never in doubt) he is allowed to continue against the victim of the crime and is banned further compounding the victims set of circumstances. What about normal sending offs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 19 hours ago, Smith's right boot said: Aye, but when Naismith does it on brown it's great banter. He should have Been sent of, but assault, ffs. Calm doon. Clueless, Hibs loving drivel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Dan Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Does Clancy get suspended for being a useless cheating twit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bazzas right boot Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 45 minutes ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: Clueless, Hibs loving drivel. What part do you disagree with? Do you not think McNulty should have been sent off? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogue Daddy Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 26 minutes ago, Dannie Boy said: Does Clancy get suspended for being a useless cheating twit Doubt it. There's not enough hours in the day to retrospectively admonish our refs for all their errors! 🤣🤣🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, Dallas Green said: I notice on that list the Hamilton lad who was sent off against us had his red card rescinded. Correct decision, imo. Of course, I'm glad it happened in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soonbe110 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: That's a change. Normally you get offered a ban and hearing only happens if you don't accept it. He has been offered two match ban, effective immediately. If he wishes to appeal the appeal is 9/3. Usual procedure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Beni of Gorgie Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 4 hours ago, davemclaren said: What about normal sending offs? No. Punishment is there in the game. Would be double jeopardy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davemclaren Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Just now, Sir Gio said: No. Punishment is there in the game. Would be double jeopardy Even if they're sent off in the 89th minute? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Beni of Gorgie Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Just now, davemclaren said: Even if they're sent off in the 89th minute? Yeah. Though I'm sure there may be scenarios. I wouldn't be averse to it applying to all reds though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 4 hours ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: Clueless, Hibs loving drivel. About covers it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMFC 86 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 10 minutes ago, jake said: About covers it. absolutely Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
livi Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51743256 Marc McNulty: Hibernian striker gets two-game ban for stamp against Hearts Edited March 5, 2020 by livi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
How's my driving Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Jack Ross more concerned with his striker options than condoning McNulty's actions Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indianajones Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 7 minutes ago, livi said: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/51743256 Marc McNulty: Hibernian striker gets two-game ban for stamp against Hearts Should be more imo. He stamps fairly high up and with some force which can be extremely dangerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
south morocco Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Hubs are set to appeal against the decision. They want him banned for the rest of the season😀 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newton51 Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysthereinspirit Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 6 minutes ago, How's my driving said: Jack Ross more concerned with his striker options than condoning McNulty's actions Well not quite. As others have said though. Two game ban is nowhere near enough. Cowardly little scum bag should have got 3 minimum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jambo, Goodbye Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 18 minutes ago, How's my driving said: Jack Ross more concerned with his striker options than condoning McNulty's actions That's how I read it too. Didn't come across as having even an ounce of regret over his player's behavior or attitude towards a fellow professional. Still hurting then Jack? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kidd’s Boots Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Trying to be objective about this scenario, but keep coming back to the position of the seriousness of the incident. It feels almost too easy to not appeal the notice of complaint instead of answering to a panel. Any street on a Saturday night in Edinburgh where CCTV captured this would certainly require a visit to the headmasters office on the Monday morning... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Beni of Gorgie Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Throw the key away Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Roller Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, How's my driving said: Jack Ross more concerned with his stalking options than condoning McNulty's actions FTFY. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redjambo Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 1 hour ago, indianajones said: Should be more imo. He stamps fairly high up and with some force which can be extremely dangerous. This. That could have caused some serious damage. A two game ban is wholly insufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 2 hours ago, How's my driving said: Jack Ross more concerned with his striker options than condoning McNulty's actions Why would he condone it? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ex member of the SaS Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 Hibs fans want him banned for longer, that to me means they should make Hibs play him every week for the rest of the season.😊 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GinRummy Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 8 hours ago, Ex member of the SaS said: Hibs fans want him banned for longer, that to me means they should make Hibs play him every week for the rest of the season.😊 He was the same last season. Good for his first few games then totally ineffective. Toss up between him, Allan and that pony central defender for worst player on Tuesday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 12 hours ago, jake said: About covers it. 👍 FTH. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldGorgie Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 17 hours ago, Joey J J Jr Shabadoo said: Clueless, Hibs loving drivel. Absolutely correct. Mc Nutters stamp was deliberate. Naismith tackled Brown and accidentally caught him full force in the baws. Totally different scenarios. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 Just now, OldGorgie said: Absolutely correct. Mc Nutters stamp was deliberate. Naismith tackled Brown and accidentally caught him full force in the baws. Totally different scenarios. I know. Only one particular Hibs fan fails to grasp that, though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.