Rudolf's Mate Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I realise that the guy looks like he doesn't want to come to us however 250k is a small amount. Surely we could trump this??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H.A.N.S Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I realise that the guy looks like he doesn't want to come to us however 250k is a small amount. Surely we could trump this??? The 850k on Beslija, 500k on Makela and 500k on Nade seems great value for money now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finny1981 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 rangers are only willing to sell him down south!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolf's Mate Posted June 25, 2008 Author Share Posted June 25, 2008 rangers are only willing to sell him down south!!! Maybe we should take a leaf out of their book and get someone else to snap him up and bring him in around January!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Sidious Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Will accept a cut in wages though? He rejected Burnley. Think Rangers are desperate to offload but I think he likes the cosy life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horse Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 What gets me is, like Allan Johnston, they sign him on a free, don't play him then move him on for a fee. IMHO if you sign a guy on a free you should not get a fee when he leaves, no matter how long he is under contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H.A.N.S Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 What gets me is, like Allan Johnston, they sign him on a free, don't play him then move him on for a fee. IMHO if you sign a guy on a free you should not get a fee when he leaves, no matter how long he is under contract. Saying that but Celtic paid 350k for Riordan, he's not kicked a ball and they want more than double what they paid. Is this ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jlo2 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 What gets me is, like Allan Johnston, they sign him on a free, don't play him then move him on for a fee. IMHO if you sign a guy on a free you should not get a fee when he leaves, no matter how long he is under contract. That's a dumb suggestion. So the OF would be able to cherry pick anyone from Scotland who came through their club's youth system or was signed of a Bosman. Get real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horse Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 Saying that but Celtic paid 350k for Riordan, he's not kicked a ball and they want more than double what they paid. Is this ok? You sound like a bitter hobo;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H.A.N.S Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 You sound like a bitter hobo;) I am as much Lord Lucan as a Leitheopian :107years: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horse Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 That's a dumb suggestion. So the OF would be able to cherry pick anyone from Scotland who came through their club's youth system or was signed of a Bosman. Get real! Who mentioned youth system? That is different and compensation has to be agreed if they are under age 24. Yes, if you sign a guy on a free transfer why should you get a fee for him? Think you find the OF already cherry pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jocam2325 Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I don't remember Gow being tht fantastic for Falkirk. A good player possibly but I don't think he is that much better than Driver or Miko. I think there is an over eagerness to sign ex Old Firm players by some clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H.A.N.S Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I don't remember Gow being tht fantastic for Falkirk. A good player possibly but I don't think he is that much better than Driver or Miko. I think there is an over eagerness to sign ex Old Firm players by some clubs. Gow was nearly a Hearts player, was on trial with Robbo when Vlad first arrived then he took off when Miko arrived with Kizys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambonian Posted June 25, 2008 Share Posted June 25, 2008 I realise that the guy looks like he doesn't want to come to us however 250k is a small amount. Surely we could trump this??? Gow had a lot of potential and is still young. Personally, i'd go for him, we need someone in who'll add something to the squad. I see Goncalves ?1m move's been turned down, thought that was a decent amount for him, I mean, how much do they actually think he's worth? Hibs seem to be getting Jonathan johansson on a free, if he's still good enough, why aren't we looking to sign him? So many questions, no feckin answers!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.