avhudtheteeshirt Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 After watching the game today I am left wondering what constitutes a penalty? At the end of the first half the Hearts player was running into the box and is tripped from the side. Hearts players never asked the question of the referee but in my eyes if it was at the other end it would have been a stonewall penalty. When it was shown during the match in replay they said it was no penalty but my view was that contact was made and the referee had a good view of it? At half time it was not even spoken about and that's usually a sign that it should have been given. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaps Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 The incident your talking IMO wasn't a penalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anythingbutgreen Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Never a pen. King wasn't even looking for it either after he'd gone down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gambo Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Would have been a very very soft penalty, seen them given though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
N User Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Rangers would have got one for it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five to One Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Would have been soft, but definitely some contact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 After watching the game today I am left wondering what constitutes a penalty? At the end of the first half the Hearts player was running into the box and is tripped from the side. Hearts players never asked the question of the referee but in my eyes if it was at the other end it would have been a stonewall penalty. When it was shown during the match in replay they said it was no penalty but my view was that contact was made and the referee had a good view of it? At half time it was not even spoken about and that's usually a sign that it should have been given. That's because it wasn't a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboMarc Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 King threw himself to the ground! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Rangers would have got one for it They did have a stronger case in the first half when Wilson, I think, had his hands all over elbows in the first half he also clamed for a penalty when he thought he was blocked in the second half which like the one the OP is claiming never was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grantaitchie8 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Never a pen, but they'd probably get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dallas Green Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 It wasn't a penalty. Contact also doesn't mean it's a foul. There is contact all over the park and fouls don't get given. King went down looking for it, when he realised he didn't actually get caught he got up without making a massive fuss, something that the rangers players would have done, like elbows crying for penalties for scuffed shots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gavsy Van Gaverson Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 No penalty. Take the maroon tinted specs off and stop being an idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 King threw himself to the ground! Miller got a foul moments before for the exact same thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.