Serj Tankian Posted January 2, 2013 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2256223/BREAKING-NEWS-Comedian-Jim-Davidson-arrested-suspicion-sexual-offences-Jimmy-Savile-detectives.html this has been going on for a bit now wonder when the charges will come Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted January 2, 2013 We can safely say that no black or Asian children were touched up then... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tommy Wiseau Posted January 2, 2013 If you could choose one person to get disgraced and locked away, that vile **** of a man would be near the top Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Mighty Thor Posted January 2, 2013 We can safely say that no black or Asian children were touched up then... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Homme Posted January 2, 2013 I had a feeling his name would appear at some point. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H J Simpson Posted January 2, 2013 puts a whole new spin on 'no-dad waistcoat' Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rossthejambo Posted January 2, 2013 That's unfortunate Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord BJ Posted January 2, 2013 Not really a surprise this one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ToadKiller Dog Posted January 2, 2013 What's even more criminal is that he was once voted Britians funniest man ! . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Serj Tankian Posted January 2, 2013 seen that there is a famous name from his day on suicide watch in the priory on fiddling charges and cabt arrest him till he is out of the priory he is 84 . Someone else arrested yesterday from showbiz circles . Paul Daniels admittting kissing school girls . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joey J J Jr Shabadoo Posted January 2, 2013 Wonder if big Walter knew he'd been nick nicked? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barney Rubble Posted January 2, 2013 Shame that ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Zico Posted January 2, 2013 puts a whole new spin on 'no-dad waistcoat' Puts a new spin on his 'hilarious' nick-nick catchphrase. Aye, right in the nick-nick you racist bell-end. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulysses Posted January 2, 2013 A couple of posts have had to be removed by the moderators. The next person to speculate on a name, hint at a name or drop clues to a name will be out of here. I won't close the thread yet, though maybe I should - I have a feeling a moderator will close it just after issuing a ban. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BigAlim Posted January 2, 2013 couldn't happen to a nicer guy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Craigieboy Posted January 2, 2013 Such a nice guy too. :omg!: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted January 2, 2013 Uly, not questioning your removal (and apologies) but the way you have written that sentence implies that I can't link the Herald Sun Melbourne story about Operation Yewtree as it all but names a suspect. Your clarification would be appreciated and I can PM the link if that helps? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ribble Posted January 2, 2013 horrible, horrible man! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulysses Posted January 2, 2013 Uly, not questioning your removal (and apologies) but the way you have written that sentence implies that I can't link the Herald Sun Melbourne story about Operation Yewtree as it all but names a suspect. Your clarification would be appreciated and I can PM the link if that helps? I got your PM, thanks, and I read the article. It doesn't name anyone, and the article doesn't appear to be in breach of defamation law either in Australia or Canada. So there's no reason not to post the link. Of course, some poor gom will then pounce and say a name - but as I often say, you can't always protect people from themselves. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted January 2, 2013 http://www.heraldsun...o-1226528150895 Here's the link I was talking about. From this it is easy to speculate on who another suspect is but I will say no more than that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulysses Posted January 2, 2013 ....but I will say no more than that. And I'm sure no-one else will either. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
leginten Posted January 2, 2013 The BBC news has just carried a report on Jim Davidson's arrest. Curiously enough, the name of the broadcasting corporation itself wasn't mentioned once in the report. A remarkable omission. Coming soon: more reports on institutional scandals where you have to guess the name of the institution involved. Should certainly keep viewers on their toes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Serj Tankian Posted January 2, 2013 he was due to star in cbb starting this week . Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted January 2, 2013 he was due to star in cbb starting this week . I think that's an appropriate sentence. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Groot Posted January 2, 2013 http://www.heraldsun...o-1226528150895 Here's the link I was talking about. From this it is easy to speculate on who another suspect is but I will say no more than that. I'll not speculate on names but if its who I think it is I'll be surprised if its true tbh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
scott_jambo Posted January 2, 2013 I'll not speculate on names but if its who I think it is I'll be surprised if its true tbh Why? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boomstick Posted January 2, 2013 So...am I right...? In order to be loved by the British public in the 70s and 80s you had to pump children? Britain, you sicken me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2NaFish Posted January 3, 2013 THE GENERATION GAME! Been on a boat in the north sea waiting to post that for hours now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sarah O Posted January 3, 2013 So...am I right...? In order to be loved by the British public in the 70s and 80s you had to pump children? Britain, you sicken me. Another reason we should be Independent. Less beasts. :'> Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GhostHunter Posted January 3, 2013 Please refer to Ulysses' earlier post(s) The BanHammer is poised. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Craig_ Posted January 3, 2013 I'll not speculate on names but if its who I think it is I'll be surprised if its true tbh I'd also be pretty surprised. Bear in mind though that just because they're to be questioned, doesn't mean they're directly involved... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Gasman Posted January 3, 2013 I'd also be pretty surprised. Bear in mind though that just because they're to be questioned, doesn't mean they're directly involved... I would guess that for every one who is a suspect, there must be dozens who are being questioned as potential witnesses and for back ground evidence. I would also suspect that many of those being "outed" on the Internet will be completely innocent of any wrong doing - not that that will stop the cyber vigilantes from wanting them named, shamed, tarred, and feathered. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Martin_T Posted January 3, 2013 (edited) This is all becoming a bit McCarthy-ist, with sex abuse instead of communism. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism Edited January 3, 2013 by Martin_T Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2NaFish Posted January 3, 2013 I would guess that for every one who is a suspect, there must be dozens who are being questioned as potential witnesses and for back ground evidence. I would also suspect that many of those being "outed" on the Internet will be completely innocent of any wrong doing - not that that will stop the cyber vigilantes from wanting them named, shamed, tarred, and feathered. says the man with thousands of posts on the rangers tax thread calling for jailtime? THEY WERE INNOCENT!! FREE MINTY AND COISTY! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jambo-Chappy Posted January 3, 2013 http://www.heraldsun...o-1226528150895 Here's the link I was talking about. From this it is easy to speculate on who another suspect is but I will say no more than that. That one's quite a shock. Can't imagine it being true. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brian Whittaker's Tache Posted January 3, 2013 (edited) dp! Edited January 3, 2013 by Brian Whittakers Tache Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jambo-Chappy Posted January 3, 2013 Name is other websites. Not hard to find. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gizmo Posted January 3, 2013 (edited) This is all becoming a bit McCarthy-ist, with sex abuse instead of communism. http://en.wikipedia....iki/McCarthyism Isn't it just. Can imagine anyone involved in any form of 70s kids television is just waiting for the inevitable knock at the door. The Police and authorities involved in this witch-hunt must know the hysteria which surrounds any mention of paedophilia. If there was not enough evidence to proceed in the 70s against any allegations, then smearing the names of various celebrities who, it seems, may be guilty of nothing more than association with Saville (who, let's not forget, has not been found guilty of anything yet, though the press have dispensed their own trial and sentence it seems) is just mischief-making. . It makes me wonder what the real motivation is for deliberately tarnishing the reputation of these people? it appears to be no more than a petty "we (ie the BBC and the Police) are getting grief, we can't prove you were involved but we'll get you by leaking your name/arresting/harassing you anyway". None of this pathetic side-show will do anything whatsoever to help any genuine victims of child abuse. Edited January 3, 2013 by Lionel Logue Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tommy Wiseau Posted January 3, 2013 Innocent until proven guilty is all well and good, but the yardstick for me is whether they look like a beast when you look at videos/photos of them with the knowledge they might be beasts. Infallible. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted January 3, 2013 If there was not enough evidence to proceed in the 70s against any allegations, then smearing the names of various celebrities who, it seems, may be guilty of nothing more than association with Saville (who, let's not forget, has not been found guilty of anything yet, though the press have dispensed their own trial and sentence it seems) is just mischief-making. . So you think Saville may be innocent? Interesting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gigolo-Aunt Posted January 3, 2013 Should not laugh as its obviously very serious stuff but being referred to as "Jimmy Savile Police" puts pictures in my head of a special branch of the police who carry ID cards with Jimmy's face on it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gizmo Posted January 3, 2013 So you think Saville may be innocent? Interesting. Do you think trial by media is the way forward? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Romanov Saviour of HMFC Posted January 3, 2013 Do you think trial by media is the way forward? No. Do you think Jimmy Saville the beast is innocent? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chester™ Posted January 3, 2013 Can a trial be brought against Savile with him being deid? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Gasman Posted January 3, 2013 says the man with thousands of posts on the rangers tax thread calling for jailtime? THEY WERE INNOCENT!! FREE MINTY AND COISTY! Well, obviously, that's different.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
