Jump to content

UKIO BANKAS making a profit


Independence

Recommended Posts

Newsletter

 

 

According to non-audited data, in 2011 ?kio bankas Group earned LTL 1.1 million in net profit. During the fourth quarter of the year ?kio bankas Group earned LTL 969 thousand in net profit. In the fourth quarter of 2011 ?kio bankas, too, operated profitably and earned LTL 400 in net profit. During the entire 2011, ?kio bankas earned a total of LTL 9.4 million in profit before taxes and provisions. Due to the influence of special provision and corporate income tax costs, the 2011 operational result of ?kio bankas is net losses of LTL 4.6 million.

 

?During 2011, both ?kio bankas and ?kio bankas Group operated profitably. Starting from the second quarter of the year, positive activity results were achieved and have been successfully maintained and consolidated within the remaining period of 2011. As regards the last quarter of the year when the entire national banking system unexpectedly faced a serious shake-up and tension, ?kio bankas successfully responded to challenges and maintained the growth of the main activity income,? Gintaras Ugianskis, ?kio bankas? Chairman of the Board, said.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, ?kio bankas net interest income continued growing ? this positive trend has been maintained for a seventh quarter in a row already. Last year ?kio bankas successfully distributed and registered a share issue of LTL 50 million nominal value, thus increasing its authorised capital up to LTL 346 million. The Bank continually was in compliance with the prudential requirements with considerable reserve: at the end of 2011, ?kio bankas Group?s capital adequacy ratio accounted for 14.89 %, and liquidity ratio ? 41.48 %.

 

?This year will also require much effort and will not be easy in the light of the current economic situation in Europe and its likely effect on the economy of our country. Nevertheless, the Bank?s gained expertise of over two decades and working experience allow us to flexibly and rapidly respond to the situation and take appropriate decisions in a timely manner,? said G. Ugianskis.

 

Apart from ?kio bankas, ?kio bankas Group holds the subsidiaries ?kio banko lizingas, ?kio banko investicij? valdymas, ?kio banko rizikos kapitalo valdymas, Investicinio turto valdymas, Bonum Publicum, Turto valdymo paslaugos, Trade Project, and Eastern Europe Development Fund. UAB ?kio banko rizikos kapitalo valdymas owns a 100 per cent interest in RAB ?kio bank lizing.

 

?kio bankas is Lithuania?s first commercial bank providing reliable services via its own wide client service network, with nearly 60 units all over the country, for a third decade already. Furthermore, ?kio bankas payment cards are accepted at 270 ATMs of the joint network and at 28 post offices of Lithuania.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Newsletter

 

 

According to non-audited data, in 2011 ?kio bankas Group earned LTL 1.1 million in net profit. During the fourth quarter of the year ?kio bankas Group earned LTL 969 thousand in net profit. In the fourth quarter of 2011 ?kio bankas, too, operated profitably and earned LTL 400 in net profit. During the entire 2011, ?kio bankas earned a total of LTL 9.4 million in profit before taxes and provisions. Due to the influence of special provision and corporate income tax costs, the 2011 operational result of ?kio bankas is net losses of LTL 4.6 million.

 

?During 2011, both ?kio bankas and ?kio bankas Group operated profitably. Starting from the second quarter of the year, positive activity results were achieved and have been successfully maintained and consolidated within the remaining period of 2011. As regards the last quarter of the year when the entire national banking system unexpectedly faced a serious shake-up and tension, ?kio bankas successfully responded to challenges and maintained the growth of the main activity income,? Gintaras Ugianskis, ?kio bankas? Chairman of the Board, said.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2011, ?kio bankas net interest income continued growing ? this positive trend has been maintained for a seventh quarter in a row already. Last year ?kio bankas successfully distributed and registered a share issue of LTL 50 million nominal value, thus increasing its authorised capital up to LTL 346 million. The Bank continually was in compliance with the prudential requirements with considerable reserve: at the end of 2011, ?kio bankas Group?s capital adequacy ratio accounted for 14.89 %, and liquidity ratio ? 41.48 %.

 

?This year will also require much effort and will not be easy in the light of the current economic situation in Europe and its likely effect on the economy of our country. Nevertheless, the Bank?s gained expertise of over two decades and working experience allow us to flexibly and rapidly respond to the situation and take appropriate decisions in a timely manner,? said G. Ugianskis.

 

Apart from ?kio bankas, ?kio bankas Group holds the subsidiaries ?kio banko lizingas, ?kio banko investicij? valdymas, ?kio banko rizikos kapitalo valdymas, Investicinio turto valdymas, Bonum Publicum, Turto valdymo paslaugos, Trade Project, and Eastern Europe Development Fund. UAB ?kio banko rizikos kapitalo valdymas owns a 100 per cent interest in RAB ?kio bank lizing.

 

?kio bankas is Lithuania?s first commercial bank providing reliable services via its own wide client service network, with nearly 60 units all over the country, for a third decade already. Furthermore, ?kio bankas payment cards are accepted at 270 ATMs of the joint network and at 28 post offices of Lithuania.

 

 

 

non-audited data :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a coincidence that some one posts a thread about how to spend 10 million a day before UKIO reports a 10 million yearly profit! :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Due to the influence of special provision and corporate income tax costs, the 2011 operational result of ?kio bankas is net losses of LTL 4.6 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Albert

Due to the influence of special provision and corporate income tax costs, the 2011 operational result of ?kio bankas is net losses of LTL 4.6 million.

 

 

When will they learn that paying taxes is a mug's game?

 

Neverheless, even on this basis, dodgy East European bank loses ?1m. RBS loses 2000 times as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will they learn that paying taxes is a mug's game?

 

Neverheless, even on this basis, dodgy East European bank loses ?1m. RBS loses 2000 times as much.

 

 

Hearts, Vlad's loss leader!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When will they learn that paying taxes is a mug's game?

 

Neverheless, even on this basis, dodgy East European bank loses ?1m. RBS loses 2000 times as much.

 

Why are we comparing banks? They operate at different levels, with different size investments and customers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Albert

Why are we comparing banks? They operate at different levels, with different size investments and customers.

 

And one pays its taxes and one doesn't. One required an absolutely enormous, unprecedented bail out from public funds, one didn't.

 

You are right, it's a stupid comparison.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And one pays its taxes and one doesn't. One required an absolutely enormous, unprecedented bail out from public funds, one didn't.

 

You are right, it's a stupid comparison.

 

Which one doesn't pay taxes?

 

If you compared RBS with Barclay's or HSBC, that would be a genuine comparison. But to compare with a Micky Mouse Eastern European bank aint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Footballfirst

Ukio Bankas performance doesn't affect Hearts directly any more. They don't hold any of our debt (based on our last accounts) as it has all been transferred to UBIG.

 

However, if Ukio is deemed to be doing ok then I guess it means that there is less pressure on UBIG to pull the plug on Hearts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Albert

Which one doesn't pay taxes?

 

If you compared RBS with Barclay's or HSBC, that would be a genuine comparison. But to compare with a Micky Mouse Eastern European bank aint.

 

Sorry I was thinking of Barclays' tax avoidance case, although RBS won't be paying much tax on its profits for a while.

 

Anyway,of course I'm not making a serious comparison between any of the UK major banks and UKIO Bankas. Just making a cheap point in reaction to comments I still quite often read about dodgy foreign banks (or "Mickey Mouse" banks if you prefer), which always amuses me coming from Edinburgh, the world capital of dodgy banks (or home of the world's biggest Mickey Mouse banks if you prefer).

 

(Just as Murray's famous "I won't be selling to any Russian" comment is pretty hilarious).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are we comparing banks? They operate at different levels, with different size investments and customers.

Why shouldn't they compare banks?

 

Some people like doing that stuff.

 

In fact some people get paid lots of money to compare different businesses.

 

It's all about ratios...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the same as contribution from old squirm to Scottish economy against Edinburgh Festival contribution? or Pars population ratio of attendees to ours or the wee teams or most fouled player against dirtiest. Just another opinion!

Wonder what bonus Vlad will get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which one doesn't pay taxes?

 

If you compared RBS with Barclay's or HSBC, that would be a genuine comparison. But to compare with a Micky Mouse Eastern European bank aint.

 

 

Surely "mickey mouse" should have been in front of RBS???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...