Jump to content

BBC Highlights


Harry Palmer

Recommended Posts

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/scotland/15912044.stm

 

No.6 :facepalm:

 

Still, he can punt the ball aimlessly.

 

:what:

 

do you have the sheer audacity to suggest that mistakes can be made by someone other than our splendid captain?

 

why this is MADNESS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:greggy:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fermit the Krog

Backs up my view from last night that was ridiculed that Webster was worse than Zaliukas.

 

Hopefully they get it sorted for next week as that wasn't good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like webster had a shocker

zals pass straight to hayes, hes lucky mcgowan sorted it for him

looked like there were plenty of chances though :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Just Came To Say Kello

why this is MADNESS.

 

 

Madness?

 

This. Is. Sp..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

..the truth. People thinking Zal was worse than Webster yesterday :vrface:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alwaysinourshadows

Zal and Webster were both shocking, looked like hammill was supposed to be marking tokely for the goal not Zaliukas as many people have said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty shocking commentary. Twice at the start Sutton is referred to as Skacel :what:

 

Noticed that too, you'd have thought the abysmal fresh air swipe might have given it away!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

maybe the television pictures have been doctored in some way to disguise the truth... that zali made all the mistakes. we should investigate... there's hating to be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amoruso_lets_it_run

What was the message on Rudi t-shirt that he revealed after scoring?

 

On an unrelated note Eggert's hair is impeccable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jambos are go!

Zal and Webster were both shocking, looked like hammill was supposed to be marking tokely for the goal not Zaliukas as many people have said

Its par for the course on here for Zaliukus to be automatically blamed for every goal conceded on JKB until proved otherwise. Even by folk not at the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our defenders :vrface:

 

Boab gets it...

 

Collective responsibility....

 

Boab will now send round the boys...and I'll be banished...

 

Off to the Shed. :ninja:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The highlights show 1 bad mistake from Zal and one bad mistake from Webster.

They are only a glimpse of the match. Zal made more than 1 mistake, Webster made more than 1 mistake.

 

Both players also contributed to our win.

Zal and Webster started many attacks with their calm passing across the back.

They both cut out many ICT attacks. They both cleared many high balls.

 

Zal in particular after his mistakes was very careful to put it out instead of dallying with the ball too long.

 

I don't see why some people like to attack our players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zal and Webster were BOTH poor yesterday.

 

The difference is;

 

Zal is more often than not brutal, a liability and a rotten footballer.

 

Webster on the other hand is more consistent, far superior and carries Zal most weeks.

 

:greggy:

 

I'm able to be honest regardless of Websters past.

 

CRAZY LIKES!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thunderstruck

Its par for the course on here for Zaliukus to be automatically blamed for every goal conceded on JKB until proved otherwise. Typically by folk not at the game.

 

I think that is more likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The highlights show 1 bad mistake from Zal and one bad mistake from Webster.

They are only a glimpse of the match. Zal made more than 1 mistake, Webster made more than 1 mistake.

 

Both players also contributed to our win.

Zal and Webster started many attacks with their calm passing across the back.

They both cut out many ICT attacks. They both cleared many high balls.

 

Zal in particular after his mistakes was very careful to put it out instead of dallying with the ball too long.

 

I don't see why some people like to attack our players.

 

It's fashion Kenif. If you're not knocking it about like Barca, you're just not good enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jamboinglasgow

So this thread rather then being about the highlights is a bun fight about who is more to blame, Zal or Webster. So when we actually win people still try to aim hate at their personal player vendettas. How about we actually fecking support the team when they win.

 

On a sidenote, and I know people wont like this, but watch Celtic's 5th goal, scored by an 18 year old Scot (who they took from Rangers.) It shows how low things have got when I am actually pleased to see Celtic playing young Scots (as opposed to Scots who decided they are Irish.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The highlights show 1 bad mistake from Zal and one bad mistake from Webster.

They are only a glimpse of the match. Zal made more than 1 mistake, Webster made more than 1 mistake.

 

Both players also contributed to our win.

Zal and Webster started many attacks with their calm passing across the back.

They both cut out many ICT attacks. They both cleared many high balls.

 

Zal in particular after his mistakes was very careful to put it out instead of dallying with the ball too long.

 

I don't see why some people like to attack our players.

 

Well said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zal and Webster were BOTH poor yesterday.

 

The difference is;

 

Zal is more often than not brutal, a liability and a rotten footballer.

 

Webster on the other hand is more consistent, far superior and carries Zal most weeks.

 

:greggy:

 

I'm able to be honest regardless of Websters past.

 

CRAZY LIKES!!!!!

 

He really isn't though is he? Zal is probably one of the most comfortable players on the ball in our team. Lapses in concentration is where he let's himself down, not in terms of ability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Zal and Webster were BOTH poor yesterday.

 

The difference is;

 

Zal is more often than not brutal, a liability and a rotten footballer.

 

Webster on the other hand is more consistent, far superior and carries Zal most weeks.

 

:greggy:

 

I'm able to be honest regardless of Websters past.

 

CRAZY LIKES!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

What a load of poo!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Great Khali

The best part about they "highlights" is obviously the size of Davey O's smile when he should have squared to Rudi.

 

Truly a thing of beauty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best part about they "highlights" is obviously the size of Davey O's smile when he should have squared to Rudi.

 

Truly a thing of beauty.

 

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The highlights show 1 bad mistake from Zal and one bad mistake from Webster.

They are only a glimpse of the match. Zal made more than 1 mistake, Webster made more than 1 mistake.

 

Both players also contributed to our win.

Zal and Webster started many attacks with their calm passing across the back.

They both cut out many ICT attacks. They both cleared many high balls.

 

Zal in particular after his mistakes was very careful to put it out instead of dallying with the ball too long.

 

I don't see why some people like to attack our players.

 

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was the message on Rudi t-shirt that he revealed after scoring?

 

On an unrelated note Eggert's hair is impeccable!

 

It was a message about Sinky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Francis Albert

Anyone who thinks either of our two centre backs are anywhere near the worst in the league should have a look at the highlights of the Hibs game (and some of the others). Some pure comedy gold defending on show.

 

Anyway the highlights for me confirmd one thing about the differences between Webby's and Zal's techniques. When he cocks up Zal looks embarrassed and offers a gesture of apology. When Webby does, he either (1) points the finger at who should really be blamed or (2) strolls nonchalantly on as if nothing has happened.

 

Anyway both are by SPL standards decent centre backs and in partnership concede few goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...