huskycol Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 So,if vlad/Paulo think is crap then why don't they do what the tims done and PROVE he was lying then,or perhaps they can't,so a media black out is the easiest option to stop people asking to many questions about one thing or another. Pretty sure,after all vlad carping on about the SFA being corrupt this would have been right up his street to prove he was correct,you would have thought that someone with such a hatred towards them (SFA,media,refs) he would have got his teeth and best lawyers to rip them a new one,come on vlad,your the one making all these accusations,back them up now that you finally have the evidence. It's not quite that simple. Hearts are bound by sfa law and if they are instructed to keep sfa business quiet they have to unless they fancy funding another sfa xmas knees up. The fact the media have ignored this one speaks volumes again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamboy81 Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Some of the replies to the tweet are laughable from OF fans, it really is a conspiracy seemingly.. if it was Neil Lennon this, if it was Neil Lennon that. I know lol. See when fans act like that, act all paranoid and that. Its really embarassing and cringeworthy. Eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thunderstruck Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It will be interesting if we get Brines again this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rudi Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 It's not quite that simple. Hearts are bound by sfa law and if they are instructed to keep sfa business quiet they have to unless they fancy funding another sfa xmas knees up. The fact the media have ignored this one speaks volumes again. :lol: Quality man,like thats stopped that halfwit before,did you read his statement on tuesday? I would say that there is no case to answer,they probably know by now brines is useless,and have more than likely demoted him to the lower leagues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huskycol Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 :lol: Quality man,like thats stopped that halfwit before,did you read his statement on tuesday? I would say that there is no case to answer,they probably know by now brines is useless,and have more than likely demoted him to the lower leagues. What was wrong in the statement? So if Brines has been demoted why was he 4th official at the Dunfermline game after the club had had their reply. sfa flexing their muscles or taking the piss there I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southside1874 Posted November 3, 2011 Share Posted November 3, 2011 Good,then lets see vlad take the SFA all the way,do you think he will,after-all the evidence is there for all to see? You need to wait until they actually have the meeting to discuss the matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Thought this might be the case this time. I expect a 3 or 4 game ban when the hearing for the Kilmarnock game happens. So he's still getting hammered then? "You've been censured, so we won't ban you this time... but if you ever do anything like this again Paulo, you'll be in trouble! By the way, your hearing's at 12 on the 17th." They could do feck all this time tbf, Brines was bang to rights. Just a shame it doesn't appear as though the club will be pursuing it any further. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coco Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 So he's still getting hammered then? "You've been censured, so we won't ban you this time... but if you ever do anything like this again Paulo, you'll be in trouble! By the way, your hearing's at 12 on the 17th." They could do feck all this time tbf, Brines was bang to rights. Just a shame it doesn't appear as though the club will be pursuing it any further. Do managers normally get touchline bans for comments - or are fines the normal punishment? Presumably at the next hearing Sergio will get a warning or suspended touchline ban given that his histrionics last weekend were a first offence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Wiseau Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Do managers normally get touchline bans for comments - or are fines the normal punishment? Presumably at the next hearing Sergio will get a warning or suspended touchline ban given that his histrionics last weekend were a first offence. Couldn't tell you C, I have no idea. Presumably fines are the norm for someone who has a history. I wouldn't be surprised to see them hammer him next time. TBH, I think even getting pulled up for those comments about Brines is a farce - more to do with the rules themselves than the individual incident. The accountability of referees is virtually non-existant on a trasparent level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Brightside Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 So,if vlad/Paulo think is crap then why don't they do what the tims done and PROVE he was lying then,or perhaps they can't,so a media black out is the easiest option to stop people asking to many questions about one thing or another. Celtic never proved anything, the linesman in that game openly admitted to the press that McDonald had told him what to say. Unless Tom Murphy decides to give a conflicting story to Brines then the SFA will publicly back the ref over the 'handball' incident at Ayr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i8hibsh Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Gutted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 The Club has had a reply Paragraph 7 But they then go on to say... "... A club spokesperson said: "The club believes there has been a huge injustice carried out on the field in the first place in relation to our exit in the cup. To compound this with a further off-field investigation into comments made by our manager in relation to the original injustice raises major questions about the game in this country. We will certainly support the manager as the stakes are extremely high for all clubs and indeed the game in this country if such injustices are allowed to continue unabated in the Scottish game... " So have they then been given a satisfactory explanation as to what the ref and linesman were doing and why? Has this reply placated Hearts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bilel Mohsni Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 So he's still getting hammered then? "You've been censured, so we won't ban you this time... but if you ever do anything like this again Paulo, you'll be in trouble! By the way, your hearing's at 12 on the 17th." They could do feck all this time tbf, Brines was bang to rights. Just a shame it doesn't appear as though the club will be pursuing it any further. Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Treasurer Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 This is a massive blow for those that are convinced the SFA is corrupt. Hearts make a polite and reasonable request for an explanation of a very strange decision by Brines. Sergio states that Brines had given him a conflicting version to the one being given as the "official" one. While waiting for that explanation the same official is appointed to a Hearts match, Sergio, rightly questions the wisdom of such an appointment. All this makes the gFA think that Sergio has some sort of case to answer. Meanwhile Lennon is given a free reign to question the integrity of and argue right in the face of, any gFA employee that he chooses without anyone at the gFA batting an eyelid. Possibly corrupt is too strong a word, but certainly double standards at least Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Floyd Posted November 4, 2011 Share Posted November 4, 2011 Meanwhile Lennon is given a free reign to question the integrity of and argue right in the face of, any gFA employee that he chooses without anyone at the gFA batting an eyelid. Possibly corrupt is too strong a word, but certainly double standards at least Ah! But PS hasn't yet used his religion or been threatened or sent suspect packages yet and until he does this and we then hold a candle light vigil for him then we will get nothing from the SFA. Thems the facts I'm afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.