All Activity

Jake thinks the ‘pal’ needs a slap before ‘someone dangerous’ gets a hold of him? FFS

Bet you would tho..

Delighted to see JP getting his award.

Hibs have something to aspire to then They are really, really pish. Long live the Foley Revolution.

Unless I fly for a whole day yes I watch all games on hearts TV like most fans that live outside Scotland. What I’m saying is he’s very lazy in my opinion. He seldom runs back to help out in defence majority of the time. He could tackle more or run at players to stop balls but he doesn’t, he always lets others do that. Once any opposing player is in his vici are away with the ball he slows down and doesn’t chase. Don’t get me wrong I rate(d) him but after his injury he’s not been the player he was. It has obviously affected his mental approach in the game also. Scottish football is way more physical than English. Most English players struggle at first until they get used to it. I was a centre midfielder so I tend to watch him and the midfield more. I think he can be a very clever footballer and holds the ball and can make some lovely passes. But soon as anyone comes at him and tackles him he moves away and loses the ball or passes it the ball too quickly then gives it away to the opposition. Watch the last 2 games highlights looking just at Beni. You’ll understand what I mean. So what I’m saying is he’s not a physical player in any way but is skilful. IMO any midfield needs strong players like the defenders. He seems very prissy. I don’t think he is happy at hearts anyway or he would have signed a new contract and the fact he hasn’t already got one speaks volumes to me. I’d be sad to see him go like Gino but he just doesn’t seem happy at hearts. Just my thoughts.

They're getting pumped. They have been rotten in recent games, and I just hope thwr this game means something in the title race... I hope to **** it comes down to this game and we are the ones to ruin it for them. They are arseholes. **** them.

Currently 2nd bottom. I love Foley.

**** sake

Natty could learn a thing or two from Pete here.

Where was that?

Leaving aside any other consideration, we don't have the prison spaces, so it'd be a hollow threat. AFAIK, the problem seems to be something of a loophole, whereby Irish law doesn't let us deport people to the UK. But that's AFAIK. Ireland and the UK have a funny relationship as regards immigration control, and that's been the case since 1922.

All the lads and lassies with their smiling faces

Pump her best pal

Well done ladies

From a personal perspective, I still rate Beni highly but also think he’s a shadow of the pre-injury Beni and will be looking for a huge contract that I’m not sure this incarnation is worth.

Stuart Hogg in rehab after his recent meltdown and arrest.

In the bottom half of their league you say? Sounds familiar, eh Hibs? They can win every game until the end of the season, and yet they still know it's been a ****ing failure of a campaign. "Best of the Bottom 6". Scrotums

Never been sure if I liked Jake threads or not. Always a bit mental.

We absolutely need to get big Pete tied down on a long term deal as the club stylist. From the few photos I've seen floating about on Twitter he, aside from CG, is the only one who knows how to dress himself.

Shoosh now, you know this how? Don't take the chance. More terts out there.

Just noticed Lorient lost their latest match. In the relegation zone with three games to go. Good luck to their opponents in the last three games. Keep doing what you are doing Mr Foley. 🙂😀😃😄🙂😀😃

But it's not an n of 2. It's the late/final tracking polls in each of the Presidential and House elections since 2014. Each of those was an average of multiple polls, and each of those polls had sample sizes of 800 upward. I'm not declaring a trend. You're declaring a bias on someone else's part, and I'm asking you to explain it. All you have to do is respond with facts. The numbers show that RCP's tracking doesn't "juice" the GOP. You could respond by demonstrating how in fact they do, because surely there's good concrete evidence for that. You could demonstrate what RCP's methods for doing this are, rather than telling me I've no interest in them. There's an alternative explanation of course, and you might want to consider that. Is it possible that you and Marshall have let your own political biases cloud your assessment of the cause and effect? As he and you describe it, you don't rate RCP because they're biased. Have you considered that maybe RCP's polling simply appears biased to you because you've already decided to write it off on the basis that their main page seems to favour the GOP? I ask because I'm tempted to think that's the case. Put simply, if RCP has been in the habit of using polls to favour one side, there will be detectable signs of that somewhere. Those signs will not be in your mind's eye, nor in an impassioned but unscientific polemic by Mr Marshall, nor in an unrelated academic paper. They'll be in RCP's numbers and poll selection. So just point to them.

Even if a few planes takes off for Rwanda with 200 asylum seekers on board, its not inconceivable that one/some/many of them will contact the Refugee Council or other support charities with access to lawyers to tell them that they're being harassed/assaulted/robbed by local gangs - and therefore Rwanda is not a "safe country" for them. Maybe the Rwanda Bill gives some insight into this, but it seems to me that a lot is riding on the definition of "safe country" from the asylum seekers viewpoint.

not had as good a feeling about a manager since Alex MacDonald