Guest jambomickey Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 according to the star that's the figure hearts looking for for lee wallaces injury! quite right aswell. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Say What Again Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 just call it quits over our latest fine Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Gin Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 according to the star that's the figure hearts looking for for lee wallaces injury! quite right aswell. Pretty much what they recently fined us for ill-discipline. Cheers for giving us our money back. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cosanostra Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Shame we lost our left back in the process though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Sheiky Baby Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 that it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dodger_84 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 So does this mean that we get 50k plus Lee's wages for the time he is injured? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
heartsfc_fan Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 (edited) So does this mean that we get 50k plus Lee's wages for the time he is injured? I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? Edited September 10, 2010 by heartsfc_fan Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dodger_84 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? Sounds about right. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
franko1874 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? There's the medical costs included in that aswell I think. Whatever that costs i'm not sure. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Shaggy2 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Personally I'd rather sue the fecker that put in what was undoubtedly a pre-meditated assault! The SFA should be insured for this sort of happening so it's maybe not that big a story? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Victorian Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 we'll get our compensation. then we'll have to wait and see what happens with the cards we get during the season. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jamboBG Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Hearts have once again been hit with a fine for poor discipline, but after topping the disciplinary table for the sixth consecutive year, the Tynecastle side have been hit with a record ?60,000 fine. The SFA have ordered Jim Jefferies side to pay ?50,000 within 30 days, with the remaining ?10,000 suspended until January. ................ We need more 10 000! Mr. Romanov said: "Gentlemen, the fines I am paying are of no help to you. Let me have my money back!" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Rev Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I would be expecting at least double that amount. Wages + Medical fee's + the damage his injury will cause our team. 100 - 200k would be a much fairer amount. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Bapswent Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 they should be forced to provide a player of the same position who is valued at more or the equivalent to the player who is injured....like how insurance companies payout. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Gershwin Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Personally I'd rather sue the fecker that put in what was undoubtedly a pre-meditated assault! The SFA should be insured for this sort of happening so it's maybe not that big a story? Hardly. It was a bad challenge but it certainly wasn't pre-meditated. Or an assault. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaun.lawson Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 they should be forced to provide a player of the same position who is valued at more or the equivalent to the player who is injured....like how insurance companies payout. Got anyone in mind? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ben Dover Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Got anyone in mind? Maybe we'll get a 60 plate Toyota Yaris in their 'new for old' policy ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest jambomickey Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 the chances are we'll get feck all from them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.