Guest jambomickey Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 according to the star that's the figure hearts looking for for lee wallaces injury! quite right aswell. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 just call it quits over our latest fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Gin Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 according to the star that's the figure hearts looking for for lee wallaces injury! quite right aswell. Pretty much what they recently fined us for ill-discipline. Cheers for giving us our money back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosanostra Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Shame we lost our left back in the process though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheiky Baby Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 that it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dodger_84 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 So does this mean that we get 50k plus Lee's wages for the time he is injured? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heartsfc_fan Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 So does this mean that we get 50k plus Lee's wages for the time he is injured? I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dodger_84 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? Sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franko1874 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I was under the assumption that it covered 12 weeks of his wages? ?4,200 a week x 12 weeks = 50K (there about's). Then again, is he on that much? There's the medical costs included in that aswell I think. Whatever that costs i'm not sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shaggy2 Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Personally I'd rather sue the fecker that put in what was undoubtedly a pre-meditated assault! The SFA should be insured for this sort of happening so it's maybe not that big a story? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 we'll get our compensation. then we'll have to wait and see what happens with the cards we get during the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboBG Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Hearts have once again been hit with a fine for poor discipline, but after topping the disciplinary table for the sixth consecutive year, the Tynecastle side have been hit with a record ?60,000 fine. The SFA have ordered Jim Jefferies side to pay ?50,000 within 30 days, with the remaining ?10,000 suspended until January. ................ We need more 10 000! Mr. Romanov said: "Gentlemen, the fines I am paying are of no help to you. Let me have my money back!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Rev Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 I would be expecting at least double that amount. Wages + Medical fee's + the damage his injury will cause our team. 100 - 200k would be a much fairer amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Bapswent Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 they should be forced to provide a player of the same position who is valued at more or the equivalent to the player who is injured....like how insurance companies payout. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gershwin Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Personally I'd rather sue the fecker that put in what was undoubtedly a pre-meditated assault! The SFA should be insured for this sort of happening so it's maybe not that big a story? Hardly. It was a bad challenge but it certainly wasn't pre-meditated. Or an assault. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaun.lawson Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 they should be forced to provide a player of the same position who is valued at more or the equivalent to the player who is injured....like how insurance companies payout. Got anyone in mind? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Dover Posted September 10, 2010 Share Posted September 10, 2010 Got anyone in mind? Maybe we'll get a 60 plate Toyota Yaris in their 'new for old' policy ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jambomickey Posted September 11, 2010 Share Posted September 11, 2010 the chances are we'll get feck all from them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.