Civil Jambo Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 I've tried betfred, betfair and the latest been using is pokerstars but pokerstars and the rest seem to favour the higher chip stack 999 times out of 1000 and pocket aces seems to get bust far too often, can anyone recommend a site that doesnt shaft you because you have the lower chip stack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigsmak Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 I've tried betfred, betfair and the latest been using is pokerstars but pokerstars and the rest seem to favour the higher chip stack 999 times out of 1000 and pocket aces seems to get bust far too often, can anyone recommend a site that doesnt shaft you because you have the lower chip stack? Read this thread mate. http://www.cardschat.com/f13/rigged-aa-test-100791/ It should answer questions about the AA rigged theory. Also have a look around the site.. all online poker questions are answered! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Era Macaroons Posted June 2, 2008 Share Posted June 2, 2008 Read this thread mate. http://www.cardschat.com/f13/rigged-aa-test-100791/ It should answer questions about the AA rigged theory. Also have a look around the site.. all online poker questions are answered! interesting stats on AA there, I dont buy into the 'rigged' thing, but didnt think it would be as bang on as that.usefull site too cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deesidejambo Posted June 3, 2008 Share Posted June 3, 2008 There should be no problem with sites for small chipstack players. See here for some. As for rigging - two sites (AP and UB) were both found to have "Superusers" who could see the hole cards of others, but these have both been rumbled. AA often gets cracked so the usual advice is not to slowplay them preflop. If you slowplay them you let a bunch of others limp in and if one of them hits you are in trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.