madjambofraser Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Just wondering if that lot will write to SFA on behalf of their loyal fans on HOW THEY GOT A PENALTY THAT WAS N'T and that the compliance officer offers Scott Brown a one game ban . Remember I put up a statement this week re Ryan Stevensons tackle on McPake which Vincent Lunny clearly stated Ref saw it , studs up etc , So Stevo got. Banned so therefore let's see what happens to Broonaldo. Nowt likely . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letsalllaughathobos Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 They will just send a thank you card with a wee cheque in it, Also some free hospitality end of season tickets, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TyphoonJambo Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 If there is no compliance official action then that would be clear unequivocal evidence of double standards, lets wait and see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoked-Glass Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 it will be a thank you letter this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollie2004 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 If there is no compliance official action then that would be clear unequivocal evidence of double standards, lets wait and see Wait and see what, we all know nothing will be said or done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Beni of Gorgie Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Is it not the ref seen it so we move on. Compliance officer is a waste of time when the game is finished anyhow.bin him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I genuinely think every single dodgy decision which goes celtics way, there are generally around 2 per week!! should be translated into an SFA clarification letter and publicised.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madjambofraser Posted April 26, 2015 Author Share Posted April 26, 2015 This is what Vincent Lunny stated this week, Is this not the same thing folks. "But the key word is 'offence' not 'incident'. We had Ryan Stevenson dealt with a couple of years ago for serious foul play where the referee and assistant had seen the tackle. "They had seen the incident but missed the fact it was serious foul play. And it is really the offence that's important, not the incident." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Victorian Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 It comes in very useful actually. To show just how demented and dishonest they are. Screaming from the rooftops one week.. getting all the big calls the next. It makes total mugs of them. But.. two things are certain. 1. Nobody in the media will sufficiently demonstrate the point. Clearly or for long enough to show them up. 2. It's not going to prevent them from repeating the whole rancid charade in the future. No siree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve444 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 There is nothing stopping us (and other fans) from writing letters to SFA etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMFC 86 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 No way the GFA will take on the mhanks after the furore last week. Brown will get away with it as per. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoff Kilpatrick Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 There is nothing stopping us (and other fans) from writing letters to SFA etcCorrect. Rather than moan on here, email the compliance officer with your complaint. They are duty bound to look into it. Play the system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Footballfirst Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Correct. Rather than moan on here, email the compliance officer with your complaint. They are duty bound to look into it. Play the system. James Deyton should be the subject of the next email after his dive to earn a penalty for St Mirren yesterday. Edit: .... and Willie Collum for his penalty decision for Celtic today. Edit (2) .... not forgetting Scott Brown's "studs showing" challenge (should set up an automatic email every week for that one) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Dunphy Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Dear Celtic, We cool now guys? Love and hugs, SPFL xxx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2205ian Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 This is what Vincent Lunny stated this week, Is this not the same thing folks. "But the key word is 'offence' not 'incident'. We had Ryan Stevenson dealt with a couple of years ago for serious foul play where the referee and assistant had seen the tackle. "They had seen the incident but missed the fact it was serious foul play. And it is really the offence that's important, not the incident." Sportscene highlighted Broonie's tackle tonight. Michael Stewart on the spot "definite red, dangerous tackle, studs up knee high, you cannot tackle like that these days" Over to CO, but I will not hold my breath Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horatio Caine Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 Was it not the case that Brown was booked for the tackle? If so, the CO cannot do anything. Ref's dealt with it. Collum's not daft! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Was it not the case that Brown was booked for the tackle? If so, the CO cannot do anything. Ref's dealt with it. Collum's not daft! Talbot was booked for his 'challenge' on Nicholson earlier in the season and subsequently given a retrospective red. I see no reason why the same cannot apply here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getintaethem Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Griffiths saying Celtic were "Due a bit of luck." Deila saying the penalty incident was "incomparable to last week.". Once again Collum gives beneficial decisions to Celtic. Poor, hard done to Celtic F.C, Scotland's victims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jake Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 There is nothing stopping us (and other fans) from writing letters to SFA etc Bit hibbyish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts_fan Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 A comprehensive digital dossier would be great in this case. Not biased, but just representing the view of any impartial observer of Scottish football. It would have video links to incidents, dates, statements of fact. **** them. In this day of independent media, the bullying / unfair political leverage on the scale performed by Celtic should be exposed for what it is. We can't rely on the media rags to do ANYTHING about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hearts_fan Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 I loved the first 15 minutes of Off the Ball on Saturday by the way, Tam and Stuart ripped celtic to shreds. Shame the print media aren't as honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 This is what Vincent Lunny stated this week, Is this not the same thing folks. "But the key word is 'offence' not 'incident'. We had Ryan Stevenson dealt with a couple of years ago for serious foul play where the referee and assistant had seen the tackle. "They had seen the incident but missed the fact it was serious foul play. And it is really the offence that's important, not the incident." But in the very same game that tool Lunny managed to miss McPake scything Robinson down who was then out injured for a number of weeks. These utter welts should shut up and get the **** away from football. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Talbot was booked for his 'challenge' on Nicholson earlier in the season and subsequently given a retrospective red. I see no reason why the same cannot apply here? Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HMFC 86 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 But in the very same game that tool Lunny managed to miss McPake scything Robinson down who was then out injured for a number of weeks. These utter welts should shut up and get the **** away from football. I seem to recall it put Robinson out for the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.