All Activity
- Past hour
-
Aye, but that wanton destruction of civilian infrastructure in Gaza might just be biased reporting, Thor. I'm sure that it'll be independently verified whether true or false in the fullness of time. At least we know the painting on the planes definitely happened.
-
It all seems a bit weird. A lot of legal commentators agreed from the start that the racketeering charge was an overreach and unlikely to be successful. There's speculation that he's done a lot more nasty shit but there's nothing that would stand in court so they went for the organised crime charge but the DoJ obviously can't say as much.
-
I disagree to a point. Hibs and aberdeen have been well funded too. Aberdeen just announced another 8 million from cormack. Thats 25million hes given them since 2019. Both clubs also done better than us in selling players. This means we didn't really get an advantage with andersons money that's not to say she didn't make mistakes with levien cathro etc.
-
Belter eh.
- Today
-
Except he wasn't injured. If you listen to the words from his own mouth then it's to do with workout loading after he rushed back from his last injury. Building him slower than others to get his strength up to avoid any relapses He wasn't the only one who missed sessions either for the same reason
-
Most of us 🤣🤣🤣
-
anti-lesbian post. Reported to mods.
-
JamboGee92 started following Poll on Shankland re-signing , Sir Lawrence Shankland and Exciting times!
-
Yep... in my pants!
-
I wanted us to remove our offer but won't lie and say that I'm disappointed he's signed. I hope he finds his form again and am more confident he will under McInnes.
-
During the trial he took ownership of his violence towards women and others multiple times. It probably seemed a good idea at the time but it's on the record now. It was taken into account when considering his bail request, and likely will be for sentencing.
-
Last season was a disaster top to bottom. Hearts sticking with Shankland even after a long search tells me McInnes thinks Shankland is closer to what he was his first two seasons than last. I think this is a risky return but if his contract is not ridiculously out of alignment with the rest of our wage structure, then I understand Hearts betting on his upside And if you mean he was a 10 like when Critchley played him there in the Diamond, that was a disaster for everyone. Playing Shanks as a 10 with Elton and WIlson looking like wingers was awful. I'm doing my best to ignore that stretch of Hearts football ever happened
-
Heart of Midlothian 2025 summer transfer thread - Stuart Findlay signs on loan
Smithian replied to hereford_hearts's topic in The Terrace
This is a season of consolidating third, not taking swings on unproven talent. I'd be a bit confused if 12 months from no, assuming a successful season, the profile of our signings didn't include a few chances on young talent. -
Christ how long do you think his arms are?
-
Never said I did. But I know what he did first two seasons. I know what he did last season. I really hope that he comes back ‘fitter stronger better’ and put himself back on top where he belongs. Once I’ve seen what I need to see then I’ll decide then. Cheers. 👍
-
Putting personal opinion to one side for a minute We are stronger with him, than without him Anyone who says otherwise needs their head read Del went all out to get him to re-sign Again, there is a completely valid reason for him doing this It was too long coming, yes, but hopefully that's it done and dusted now, and everyone can get away from this thread
-
Ok. That’s your point of view and as you said it’s a hearts forum. In my opinion football supporters are like sitting on a sea-saw. Not everybody weighs the same but sometimes you do. So you’re either going to be up, down or in the middle. I’m a passionate hearts fan. I won’t lie about that. That’s my downfall. Always have been. If a player isn’t playing to the best and let themselves go. Then yeh I will sway one way and shout it loud. If they don’t sign a contract and **** us around for 18 months then I’m swayed more and shout louder. But… If they play well and do the job they are paid for then I’ll sway back the other way. That’s being a football fan regardless of team or player. I’m of the older generation where we got to vent our anger standing up in the shed at the game with no come backs. That for me was football. I don’t hold back. So I’ve no cares about it. So if you would like to salute “all two of me” what ever that means then go ahead. 🫡🫡 But I live by the see-saw theory in everything. You should try it sometime. Life isn’t always sitting on the sea-saw by yourself.
-
Loving this. Del will get the very very best out of Shanks, that's an absolute certainty. Kabangu and Braga sharing the load The vermin seem to think nobody wanted him 🤣 Watch the goals roll in HHGH ❤️🙏❤️
-
Listened to one of the multitude of podcasts on this trial and roughly this outcome was predicted by most of the expert guests. They said repeatedly that they were unsure how the prosecution could prove a conspiracy where he was the only conspirator and the only guy on trial. That was the charge that they really wanted and the team that prosecuted Diddy has about a 95% success rate. The show got a couple of lawyers from the Weinstein trial and they were in agreement that this was going to be an uphill struggle convincing a jury that it was an organised criminal conspiracy and that the two main witnesses were credible. The guy was clearly an evil prick and consistent domestic abuser but he wasn't on trial for any of that. The prosecution wanted him away for life, hence the organised crime charge. He's clearly dangerous and a threat to women but other than flying prostitutes around the US (federal crime), domestic abuse and arson of Kid Cudi's car (which he also wasn't charged with) - it's hard to see why the prosecution went so hard at him and why they thought he deserved life in jail without parole. He wasn't charged with any rapes or sexual assaults which surprised some on the podcast. I'm guessing the prosecution must have thought the organised crime route was the most likely to get this guy away for good. It just never seemed to fit his pattern of offending and seemed doomed from the start. He'll probably still get 3-5 years which is a lot less than what he was offered to plead out before the trial. They'll take his time served into account as well.
-
😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
-
It probably won't be true but apparently shanklands turned his back on approaches from west brom Southampton Leicester and Ipswich. If it was true then he'd probably have taken the opportunity but you never know. Either way he's staying and the sagas put to bed
-
Glad you took it the way it was meant. Absolutely no interest in discouraging support and guidance. Haha im more a black out and when i come around wonder why im stuck under a table/why im in a field/why im in a different country (managed this last one twice). May try your approach it seems far better
-
Generally speaking, the person with the greatest financial interest is the one with the most influence. Particularly when heritable creditor. There seems to be immense reluctance to recognise this on here. Puzzling, but there you go.
-
I’m waaay more offended that you think that is better than the Hawaiian sunset!😉😂