Swimmer Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Just listening to TalkSport and they mentioned the points per average salary per team. So after a little digging I have pulled a table together showing the SPFL and reported average salaries per player against the points total as of today. As you can see, the ugly sisters are paying way above anyone else in the league with St Johnstone playing way above their wage bill. Anyone have any opinion on this? Team Ave Salary Points points / salary Celtic 717860 100 ?7,179 Aberdeen 134670 70 ?1,924 Rangers 316888 64 ?4,951 St Johnstone 47206 55 ?858 Hearts 86890 46 ?1,889 Partick Thistle 42671 42 ?1,016 Kilmarnock 48950 41 ?1,194 Ross County 47515 40 ?1,188 Dundee 61837 37 ?1,671 Motherwell 49335 35 ?1,410 Hamilton 42606 32 ?1,331 Inverness CT 53345 28 ?1,905 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Sorry but I couldn't read that. Celtic 717860 100 ?7,179 Aberdeen 134670 70 ?1,924 Rangers 316888 64 ?4,951 St Johnstone 47206 55 ?858 Hearts 86890 46?1,889 Partick Thistle 42671 42 ?1,016 Kilmarnock 48950 41 ?1,194 Ross County 47515 40 ?1,188 Dundee 61837 37 ?1,671 Motherwell 49335 35 ?1,410 Hamilton42606 32 ?1,331 Inverness CT 53345 28 ?1,905 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Is Aberdeen's salary bill really that much more than ours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King prawn Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Celtic's average salary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo-in-furness Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 I'd like to see a championship comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Celtic's average salary Absolutely astonished at that. Averaging ?15,000 a week? I'd have called someone a slaver if they'd suggested that figure to me in the pub etc. What on earth are their top earners getting to offset the likes of Mackay-Steven, Forrest, McGregor, Henderson etc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Is Aberdeen's salary bill really that much more than ours? No it's flawed, not all salaries published by the clubs release to playing staff, aberdeens accounts include segments such as retail and hospitality that we have outsourced (but are bringing back in) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo-in-furness Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Hats off to the Sainties considering especially that this is the fifth year in succession that they're in Europe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 No it's flawed, not all salaries published by the clubs release to playing staff, aberdeens accounts include segments such as retail and hospitality that we have outsourced (but are bringing back in) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vegas-voss Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Did anyone see the two Manchester clubs average is over ?7m. As big as Celtic's looks it's scary that even Watford's is over ?2m to dwarf Scotland's biggest club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS86 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Hats off to the Sainties considering especially that this is the fifth year in succession that they're in Europe. Is it? Pretty sure they weren't in Europe start of this season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Hearts are going to have to increase the average salary payable if we're to put the mediocrity of this season behind us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamtartan74 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Is it? Pretty sure they weren't in Europe start of this season5th season out of the last 6. Very decent for a team of their size. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iainmac Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Hearts are going to have to increase the average salary payable if we're to put the mediocrity of this season behind us. Or get smarter at recruiting & get better VFM than we are currently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamboAl Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Hearts are going to have to increase the average salary payable if we're to put the mediocrity of this season behind us. They could also reduce the number of players or do a bit of both Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spencer Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Or get smarter at recruiting & get better VFM than we are currently. That's for sure. Not sure I'd be confident of DoF overseeing such a correction Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seymour M Hersh Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 I was listening to the guy on talk sport and was thinking this is statistics for statistics sake. Genuinely see nothing worthwhile to take from this info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS86 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 5th season out of the last 6. Very decent for a team of their size. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk I had this discussion with a Saints ST holder last week about how they are performing so well given their budget and low attendances. Didn't appreciate me saying they have been punching above their weight for some time now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS86 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Btw Dundee's average salary!! Seems pretty high considering Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacDonald Jardine Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Btw Dundee's average salary!! Seems pretty high consideringInverness is the one that surprises me. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS86 Posted May 16, 2017 Share Posted May 16, 2017 Inverness is the one that surprises me. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk Yeah it's higher than I'd have expected too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ketchup Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Inverness is the one that surprises me. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk Took me a bit of time to understand this, but the final figure quoted per team is not the team's averagre player salary. It is the total salary divided by the number of points that the team have won this season - I think. Therefore it is effevtively calculating the cost per point with regards to player salaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Took me a bit of time to understand this, but the final figure quoted per team is not the team's averagre player salary. It is the total salary divided by the number of points that the team have won this season - I think. Therefore it is effevtively calculating the cost per point with regards to player salaries. Someone's got to say it, might as well be me. No shit Sherlock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ibrahim Tall Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Inverness is the one that surprises me. Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk Can understand it tbh, they've won a cup recently and at the start of the season you wouldn't have expected them to be anywhere near relegation. It is 'high' for their attendances but for the best part of a decade they've been top 6 or thereabouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy T Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 It's hats off to Partick this season. Great achievement. Always had good trips through there and they play good football. I'd be surprised if they hang on to their manager much longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Hearts are going to have to increase the average salary payable if we're to put the mediocrity of this season behind us. No we don't have to. We have to make sure that we bring in the very best players we can for the salaries we can offer, and get a return for what we are paying out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Someone's got to say it, might as well be me. No shit Sherlock. aye, but most of the replies suggest they don't realise that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 I was listening to the guy on talk sport and was thinking this is statistics for statistics sake. Genuinely see nothing worthwhile to take from this info. I tend to agree, table below is better, but the values I don't trust. Ave/Annual Ave weekly Celtic 717,860 13,805 Rangers 316,888 6,094 Aberdeen 134,670 2,590 Hearts 86,890 1,671 Dundee 61,837 1,189 ICT 53,345 1,026 Motherwell 49,335 949 Kilmarnock 48,950 941 Ross Co 47,515 914 St Johnstone 47,206 908 Partick Th 42,671 821 Hamilton 42,606 819 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 It's hats off to Partick this season. Great achievement. Always had good trips through there and they play good football. I'd be surprised if they hang on to their manager much longer. Recently linked with Swindon in League 1. I doubt he will still be at Firhill by end of 17/18 season. Been very impressed with what he has done with Thistle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Brown Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Ave/Annual Ave weekly Celtic 717,860 13,805 Rangers 316,888 6,094 Aberdeen 134,670 2,590 Hearts 86,890 1,671 Dundee 61,837 1,189 ICT 53,345 1,026 Motherwell 49,335 949 Kilmarnock 48,950 941 Ross Co 47,515 914 St Johnstone 47,206 908 Partick Th 42,671 821 Hamilton 42,606 819 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy T Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Recently linked with Swindon in League 1. I doubt he will still be at Firhill by end of 17/18 season. Been very impressed with what he has done with Thistle. I know it's a completely mute point but I'd love to have had him at tynecastle after Neilson. Young manager progressive football and they seem to play for him. They've unearthed some decent talent also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ1984 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 I know it's a completely mute point but I'd love to have had him at tynecastle after Neilson. Young manager progressive football and they seem to play for him. They've unearthed some decent talent also. My fear is he will end up in Leith once Lennon has a breakdown after a shite start to the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain America Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 I know it's a completely mute point but I'd love to have had him at tynecastle after Neilson. Young manager progressive football and they seem to play for him. They've unearthed some decent talent also. He was the replacement I wanted at the time, few posters shot down the suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Whittaker's Tache Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Who's earning the big bucks over at Castle Greyskull? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy T Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 He was the replacement I wanted at the time, few posters shot down the suggestion. I think the crumb of comfort is it shows if you let a young manager build he can actually improve and get better season on season. The problem for Partick is can he actually make them better than this season. His stock may be at its highest and if that's his thinking then he may not get an opportunity to get a decent move if he stays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Continental Op Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Is Aberdeen's salary bill really that much more than ours? The have a smaller squad than we do - 24 to 29 according to Transfermkt. That boosts their average salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Couple of points - No it's flawed, not all salaries published by the clubs release to playing staff, aberdeens accounts include segments such as retail and hospitality that we have outsourced (but are bringing back in) Surely adding in hospitality workers salaries would reduce the average wage. The have a smaller squad than we do - 24 to 29 according to Transfermkt. That boosts their average salary. On the face of it the amount of players shouldn't make any difference to the average salary but I suppose having less of a squad allows them to pay more to these players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy T Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Who's earning the big bucks over at Castle Greyskull? Clint 'grandpa" Hill apparently on 12k pw...now that's funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zibi Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Who's earning the big bucks over at Castle Greyskull?I'd guess Kranjcar, Hill, Rossiter Garner etc. Anyone who signed this summer pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin Z Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Who's earning the big bucks over at Castle Greyskull Snake Mountain? For accuracy's sake . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i wish jj was my dad Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Recently linked with Swindon in League 1. I doubt he will still be at Firhill by end of 17/18 season. Been very impressed with what he has done with Thistle. I wouldn't mind him at Tynecastle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ketchup Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Couple of points - Surely adding in hospitality workers salaries would reduce the average wage. On the face of it the amount of players shouldn't make any difference to the average salary but I suppose having less of a squad allows them to pay more to these players. Not sure if you are trolling? If not, I'm genuinely not sure if you understand this yourself, Sherlock? These figures represent... 1. Club's total salary expenditure for the year. 2. Number of SPFL Premiership points won in 2016/17. 3. The cost per point in terms of salary, figure 1 / figure 2. Now that's clear. If Aberdeen (or any other team) are including the wages of all club staff (i.e. hospitality etc.) then their figure 1 will be inflated, also giving an inflated figure 3, as there will be discrepencies with other clubs who outsource various aspects. This quite literally has nothing to do with average wages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 Not sure if you are trolling? If not, I'm genuinely not sure if you understand this yourself, Sherlock? These figures represent... 1. Club's total salary expenditure for the year. 2. Number of SPFL Premiership points won in 2016/17. 3. The cost per point in terms of salary, figure 1 / figure 2. Now that's clear. If Aberdeen (or any other team) are including the wages of all club staff (i.e. hospitality etc.) then their figure 1 will be inflated, also giving an inflated figure 3, as there will be discrepencies with other clubs who outsource various aspects. This quite literally has nothing to do with average wages. With respect - don't talk shite. 1. This is not the total salary expenditure, it is the average salary - do you really think that 42,671 is Partick Thistle's annual salary bill? This quite literally has everything to do with average wages. Just to clarify so that you understand - if you include the lower paid club staff (ie hospitality) then figure 1 (the average) salary would drop, as would the figure in column 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson5 Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 With respect - don't talk shite. 1. This is not the total salary expenditure, it is the average salary - do you really think that 42,671 is Partick Thistle's annual salary bill? This quite literally has everything to do with average wages. Just to clarify so that you understand - if you include the lower paid club staff (ie hospitality) then figure 1 (the average) salary would drop, as would the figure in column 3. But club staff aren't going to be counted as playing staff. So it increases the average. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ketchup Posted May 17, 2017 Share Posted May 17, 2017 With respect - don't talk shite. 1. This is not the total salary expenditure, it is the average salary - do you really think that 42,671 is Partick Thistle's annual salary bill? This quite literally has everything to do with average wages. Just to clarify so that you understand - if you include the lower paid club staff (ie hospitality) then figure 1 (the average) salary would drop, as would the figure in column 3. You're bang on. I'm talking shite. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 But club staff aren't going to be counted as playing staff. So it increases the average. I know, which makes the difference between us and Aberdeen more surprising if as has been said they do include club staff and hospitality and we don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graygo Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 You're bang on. I'm talking shite. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson5 Posted May 18, 2017 Share Posted May 18, 2017 I know, which makes the difference between us and Aberdeen more surprising if as has been said they do include club staff and hospitality and we don't. I think the point is that the average salary of some clubs is too high to begin with. If Aberdeen's wages produced in their annual account include management, scouts, coaches, office staff, club shop staff and hospitality staff. Then the starting figure is higher when they then divide it by the amount of registered players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.