Walter Bishop Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Following on from the No to Newco thread i thought i`d start a poll to show the resounding NO we want our club to vote!!!! Let`s just hope Hearts are listening!!!! Mods can you add the poll?? Never came out and it wont let me add??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vlad-Stupid Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Where's the poll (not that anyone will vote yes except for Craig) ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John McClure Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 Pretty sure the No thread was a very clear message Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CavySlaveJambo Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 I think as a new company they should be treated like other new company's. Divison 3 at highest, SoS or Juniors should be the proper place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigC Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 102 vs 0 Pretty clear message Hearts! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicholas Brody Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 They can go **** themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Five to One Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 102 vs 0 Pretty clear message Hearts! Make that 103 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hansel Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 111 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Plissken Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 129 This is officially the most one-sided poll in kickback history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Say What Again Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 129 This is officially the most one-sided poll in kickback history. Was very (pleasantly) surprised when my vote made it 130/0/0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Papa Lazarou Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 147 to Zero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Plissken Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 There had to be one, didn't there? Explain yourself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Buck Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 168 vs 1 Who said yes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stanley_ Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 There had to be one, didn't there? Explain yourself... Judging by his post on another thread, I'm guessing it was a mistake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Plissken Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Judging by his post on another thread, I'm guessing it was a mistake. I noticed that too, I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamboozy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 hope every other clubs fans feel this way, and show it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paolo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 168 vs 1 Who said yes? A new member called GSmith. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I thought about this last night a lot and my answer is now......mibbe. If they want to retain their history, no. It's div 3 for them. If they want a new club with no history, yes, but with heavy sanctions. Points deductions, football debts settled, transfer embargo. This is based on how other clubs have been treated in the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deso1972 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Not until Sandy Jardine apologies to each and every football supporter in Scotland for the atrocious bullying behaviour he has displayed all throughout this fiasco. I also believe Rangers should publicly apologise for their behaviour, so far not one representative has acted with humility or even apologised for years of systematic cheating. so I vote no... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tasavallan Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 If we are wanting this poll to be looked at seriously, I'd remove the 'GTF' from the NO. Anyway, it's 'NO GTF' from me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudiboy Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I voted NO. My reason for this is, if it was Kilmarnock, Dunfermline or even us, everybody would be voting no to getting back into the SPL. The fact it's Rangers who have a big travelling support does not mean clubs should vote yes. So a NO is only fair in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingantti1874 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I voted NO. My reason for this is, if it was Kilmarnock, Dunfermline or even us, everybody would be voting no to getting back into the SPL. The fact it's Rangers who have a big travelling support does not mean clubs should vote yes. So a NO is only fair in my opinion. There wouldn't even be a vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chico1874 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 No,no,no,no,no,no! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Lyon Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 The Scotsman says we HMFC are a definite yes in any vote to retain RFC in the SPL so what's the point of this poll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stirlingshirejambo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 The Scotsman says we HMFC are a definite yes in any vote to retain RFC in the SPL so what's the point of this poll? Truly awful paper Truly awful journalists Do not take anything you read in there seriously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cigaro Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Do the Scotsman justify that at all, or is it just their usual drivel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hungry hippo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I thought about this last night a lot and my answer is now......mibbe. If they want to retain their history, no. It's div 3 for them. If they want a new club with no history, yes, but with heavy sanctions. Points deductions, football debts settled, transfer embargo. This is based on how other clubs have been treated in the past. No teams have remained in the Scottish leagues in living memory immediately aftet being liquidated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnboy26 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 No teams have remained in the Scottish leagues in living memory immediately aftet being liquidated. no gtf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Craigieboy on the WUM I see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
upthehill Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 How do I get to vote no more than once? If that's possible, that's how I'd like to vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hannibal Lecter Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Would like to hear why those who have voted anything but no say why. No way should they be allowed to play in the SPL. It sends out some sort of message that hey you've cheated but that's okay. The SFL shouldn't also accept them, make them apply for the vacant space along with other teams who want the place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 How do I get to vote no more than once? If that's possible, that's how I'd like to vote You can only vote once on these polls? It allows you to delete it and vote again, but it won't let you vote twice.....if that's what you're getting at.... And it's a resounding NO from me too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radge21 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Corrupt Rangers have been cheating the other SPL teams for nearly 20 years. They have been caught and dont like it blaming everyone else. Rangers fans think the SPL and SFA have let them down. Complete joke, the SPL and SFA are just as corrupt and cant do enough to help Rangers. Against all the other clubs wishes. Rangers should be licked out by both bodies, instead of asking the other clubs to make the decision. No to corrupt newco. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossthejambo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 No from me, I fear we'll vote yes though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ibpc Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 No 463-2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redm Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 A resounding yes from member CocoBear Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peter_hmfc Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Yes - 3 Undecided - 2 No - 492 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iantjambo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 number 505 money ahead of integrity? no thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl Sweatshirt Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hartleys_Jam_Tart Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Who on earth is voting yes ?!?!?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Bapswent Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Who on earth is voting yes ?!?!?! LoveTheHearts , Craigieboy , Bugsy Siegel , Earl Sweatshirt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hartleys_Jam_Tart Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 LoveTheHearts , Craigieboy , Bugsy Siegel , Earl Sweatshirt Odd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norm Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 No teams have remained in the Scottish leagues in living memory immediately aftet being liquidated. Checked this last night and Livingston were in liquidation for a day, before they were rescued. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gashauskis9 Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 The Scotsman says we HMFC are a definite yes in any vote to retain RFC in the SPL so what's the point of this poll? The same Scotsman that said on Monday that a CVA was very likely to be agreed, only to completely change their tune the next day! They could listen to the fans and vote no, but face a drop in TV revenues and lose out on the Wallace cash. They could vote yes and lose thousands of fans in the process and still possibly lose the Wallace money. I think they'll vote yes, but not for the obvious reasons being muted in the press. I think they're looking more at the fact that Rangers are out of Europe for the next 3 years, so finishing 3rd (which we have managed to do on numerous occasions) will get Champions League football, which along with the TV revenues, gate receipts (and possibly Wallace money) which comes from keeping them in, makes us more marketable to potential buyers. I'm a solid no, because it's all about the principles for me. We've had so much financial hardship for most of my lifetime, so the fact that a team can cheat for most of my lifetime whilst everyone else suffers disgusts me. I'd rather see us continue to struggle financially than put our necks on the line to keep another club afloat. Walking away because you don't like the manager or the owner is daft, and I'd never subscribe to that, but walking away from attending games because your team has blatently ignored their own fans in exchange for working to someone else's agenda is absolutely acceptable IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Benoit Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Odd I voted no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winnertwo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 won all those titles with money they didnt have, deserve to be third division bound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CavySlaveJambo Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 I think they'll vote yes, but not for the obvious reasons being muted in the press. I think they're looking more at the fact that Rangers are out of Europe for the next 3 years, so finishing 3rd (which we have managed to do on numerous occasions) will get Champions League football It won't though. Losing the second CL place after this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doc Rob Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 It won't though. Losing the second CL place after this season. Not just that, but we're unlikely to get a second place any time soon, as with the Huns out of Europe our coefficient is likely to drop further. (They don't tend to do that well in Europe, but have the odd good year). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munch Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 NO TO NEWCO GTF :verymad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hearts @ heart Posted June 13, 2012 Share Posted June 13, 2012 Rangers have been caught. As they will not do the decent thing and accept punishment from the govering bodies. They should get every possible obsticle put in there path so they cannot profit from there wrong doings while other businesses and clubs have been ripped off. The League is almost a mickey mouse tournamant as it stands. It would be rightly ridiculed if Rangers are not demoted. I do not want to see them disapear but the right starting spot for them would be in the SFL division 3. I also think they should not be allowed to recevieve any TV money untill all outstanding football debts have been cleared, as well as only being allowed to sign under 19's till this has happened. How can they be trusted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.