Julio Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I am so glad spurs done chelsea today. This thread is about a Sellick cheating baw bag............... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Is this thread about Celtic cheating again or about fecking Chelsea ? What I want to know is what Richard Gordon and the lads said about it. I'm sure he must have been raging at this act of gross cheating, no ? Its meant to be about a Sellick cheating bar steward............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bistokid Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 This thread is about a Sellick cheating baw bag............... Is it ? Thanks for clearing that up. Don't know why your confused though. Its pretty clear what iam getting at. Not the sharpest knife presumably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Is it ? Thanks for clearing that up. Don't know why your confused though. Its pretty clear what iam getting at. Not the sharpest knife presumably. Think we know whose a couple of slices short of the average loaf.............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bistokid Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Think we know whose a couple of slices short of the average loaf.............. Do we? Please fill me in. :Something something smiley face: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gigolo-Aunt Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Thats 3 Celtic players throwing themselves at the deck in a week. European ref was not conned but the Scottish one was. I wait to see if this is picked up in the media, think we know the answer to that one though........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julio Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Thats 3 Celtic players throwing themselves at the deck in a week. European ref was not conned but the Scottish one was. I wait to see if this is picked up in the media, think we know the answer to that one though........ Luckily the refs in Europe haven't been corrupted into the sellick way..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badly drawn boy Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Thats 3 Celtic players throwing themselves at the deck in a week. European ref was not conned but the Scottish one was. I wait to see if this is picked up in the media, think we know the answer to that one though........ Add Scott Macdonald to the list -St Mirren defender makes minimal contact flipping his finger at him after Macdonald bumps him about , seconds delay and the little scrote clutches his face Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambo98 Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Cheating is a way of life for Terrorist FC. Given that we've nothing left to play for this season, I wouldn't be too upset if we lost to Rangers FC on Wednesday. WTF !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Drago Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 RE: Chelsea. If you're going to randomly pick an English team to 'support', why pick a crap one like Chelsea? If you're going to be a glory hunter, would you not be better picking a team that actually wins things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveofthegame Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I detest both Rangers and Celtic, i just happen to detest Celtic more than Rangers. I would prefer Rangers won the league, BUT of course i still 100% want us to win on Wed and battle our way into the top 6. FWIW i think we'll get something, i really do. The title will be won in the 3 remaining OF fixtures anyway, not on what happens on Wed night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Busby ! Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I detest both Rangers and Celtic, i just happen to detest Celtic more than Rangers. I would prefer Rangers won the league, BUT of course i still 100% want us to win on Wed and battle our way into the top 6. FWIW i think we'll get something, i really do. The title will be won in the 3 remaining OF fixtures anyway, not on what happens on Wed night. I would prefer - in equal measure - that both clubs be wiped out tomorrow by a 10 mile wide asteroid blowing their respective lairs to eternity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beverley Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I would prefer - in equal measure - that both clubs be wiped out tomorrow by a 10 mile wide asteroid blowing their respective lairs to eternity yay sense at last if those 2 clubs were gone by the morning, would anyone really care apart from the bigots who thrive on their success of course Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piper X Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 What sickens me is people on here that suck up to the mhankies......... I swear. I fekin hate those weggie tyms more than I hate hibs. Im sick of the way thet saunter (and they do) through season after season getting away with murder. And theyve got the audasity to claim the GFA are against them. They dont win the league. They BUY the league. But this time round they have been found out - by their ugly sister, whos just as bad. I wish both of them, and their sectarian and/or glory hunting fans would GTF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geddy Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 I can think of LOTS of occasions Hearts have been robbed of points from Celtic due to referees and cheating. I can think of LOTS of occasions Hearts have been robbed of points from Rangers due to referees and cheating. I cannot distinguish between them as I have no political/religious oppions on another country! I only see them both on footballing terms. They are both cheating bar-stewards who promote the worst in people. I would like to say well done to Drew Busby the TRUE voice of reason when he/she said... "I would prefer - in equal measure - that both clubs be wiped out tomorrow by a 10 mile wide asteroid blowing their respective lairs to eternity ". I hope we trounce the dirty hun gets on Wednesday. As i would if we were playing the other lot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OmiyaHearts Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 i'm at the point where i dont a have a problem with diving anymore, it used to really do my head in. but. it happens in almost every league every week. if one of our own dives and wins something then good. cos theres gonna be someone there to get us back for it at some other point in the season. hope i didnt sound too much like andy walker there. as a side issue on this forum: i would like celtic to win the league - i hate both the OF but my work is full of rangers lads and the wind ups will be much better if celtic win it. u canny beat a good wind up, the OF take it so much worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Bishop Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 [/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uberjambo Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I can think of LOTS of occasions Hearts have been robbed of points from Celtic due to referees and cheating.I can think of LOTS of occasions Hearts have been robbed of points from Rangers due to referees and cheating. I cannot distinguish between them as I have no political/religious oppions on another country! I only see them both on footballing terms. They are both cheating bar-stewards who promote the worst in people. That is the reason that I even want to see Hibs beat them whenever they play them. (Except Cup comps) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
loveofthegame Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I would prefer - in equal measure - that both clubs be wiped out tomorrow by a 10 mile wide asteroid blowing their respective lairs to eternity For all i hate Rangers and Celtic, it has meant so much more winning the Scottish with them in it than it would without them. Little success that really means something would surely be better than more success without them. Ppl say the SPL would thrive without the OF, im really not so sure. I think the league would be in danger of becoming like the Irish League or something. Nae coverage and next to nae talent. Certainly no talented 'non Scots' would come in their right minds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Nakamura never dived, but he certainly wasn't fouled. A bad decision by the ref, and the ref should be made accountable for his terrible decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 OK - I get the anger at the free kick. To be honest I am more angry with the commentary / punditry. He still had to score it though - it was hardly as if it was a penalty. Great free kick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Syd Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Any clips of this dive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Any clips of this dive? BBC website have match highlights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drylaw Hearts Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 BBC website have match highlights. Having now seen this clip for the first time............ it wasn't a dive it was just another example of poor Refereeing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billco98 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I notice your wink, but that sentiment is disgusting. On the subject of Terrorist FC's, Rangers could give Celtic a run for their money with their past complicity in allowing their players to appear in N.I. at functions attended by convicted terrorists, and at which funds raised supported loyalist criminals and their families. Can you please leave your agenda out of a forum to do with HMFC, a non-religious, non-political club open to all? Thanks Well put, bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billco98 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 I don,t agree with his post but suspect it's possibly done to catch tiddlers like yourself who's own posts are a little bit up yer own erchie type posts. Doesn't take long for the sound of the flute to rally the fellow travellers to the cause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colingwood Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Saw this last night. It wasn't a dive as there was contact. The challenge came from the side, maybe slightly behind, as nakamura was running at an angle across the pitch. Critically the St Mirren player made contact with nakamura before he got the ball. Rule 12 A direct free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following four offences: ? tackles an opponent to gain possession of the ball, making contact with the opponent before touching the ball It may have been soft and was probably stupid but the referee was correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Saw this last night. It wasn't a dive as there was contact. The challenge came from the side, maybe slightly behind, as nakamura was running at an angle across the pitch. Critically the St Mirren player made contact with nakamura before he got the ball. Rule 12 A direct free kick is also awarded to the opposing team if a player commits any of the following four offences: ? tackles an opponent to gain possession of the ball, making contact with the opponent before touching the ball It may have been soft and was probably stupid but the referee was correct. The St Mirren player came in from the side, well Nakamura ran towards him, and the St Mirrer player was between Nakamura nad the ball, Nakamura ran into the St Mirren player. The ref was wrong. Nakamura never went down easy, just tripped over/tangled with the St Mirren player, he certainly wasn't theatrical. Click here on the BBC player, and watch it from 4 mins+ onwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Drago Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 so..... it's ok to dive, as long as there's contact, not matter how small or insignificant that contact is? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billco98 Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 That is the reason that I even want to see Hibs beat them whenever they play them. (Except Cup comps) Me too, bud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Bishop Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 The St Mirren player came in from the side, well Nakamura ran towards him, and the St Mirrer player was between Nakamura nad the ball, Nakamura ran into the St Mirren player. The ref was wrong. Nakamura never went down easy, just tripped over/tangled with the St Mirren player, he certainly wasn't theatrical. Click here on the BBC player, and watch it from 4 mins+ onwards. So because he wasnt theatrical its ok??? What alot of pesh. He WASNT fouled yet wont down and appealed for a decision, this in my book is cheating! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 So because he wasnt theatrical its ok??? What alot of pesh. He WASNT fouled yet wont down and appealed for a decision, this in my book is cheating! He collided with an opponent, and fell over, because of the collision, tangle of legs etc. He didn't appeal for a free kick, he wasn't theatrical. How was he cheating? Because he took the free-kick his team were awarded, due to a bad decision by a referee? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Dover Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Let me see now....................miko is allegedly 'known' for diving so the Refs pay particular attention to him and are, as a result, less inclined, nay justified ( copyright BBC sports ) in awarding him zero free kicks However Naka, who has saved the filth umpteen times with kicks from that range, has somehow failed to 'alert' the Refereeing fraternity that he and his team mates might just be at it when going to ground in and around that zone ? Why do we bother I ask Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walter Bishop Posted February 25, 2008 Author Share Posted February 25, 2008 He collided with an opponent, and fell over, because of the collision, tangle of legs etc. He didn't appeal for a free kick, he wasn't theatrical. How was he cheating? Because he took the free-kick his team were awarded, due to a bad decision by a referee? Just watched it again, it was theatrical, he does appeal (as do his team mates) and it WAS cheating. Feckin joke!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUTOL Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 Just watched it again, it was theatrical, he does appeal (as do his team mates) and it WAS cheating. Feckin joke!! Where are you watching it? and how does he appeal? and how is he theatrical? Can't believe I'm defending a Celtic player getting an unjustified free-kick resulting in a goal/victory. FTC, it was a dive and he should be banned for life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gizmo Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 [/img] Class! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tolcross lad Posted February 25, 2008 Share Posted February 25, 2008 He collided with an opponent, and fell over, because of the collision, tangle of legs etc. He didn't appeal for a free kick, he wasn't theatrical. How was he cheating? Because he took the free-kick his team were awarded, due to a bad decision by a referee? Nakamura is a master at cheating and he often does this by deliberately moving into the path of his opponent.The ball was there to be won and Nakamura fell over easily. He is up to these tricks all the time .He tried it on towards the end of the game against Barcelona and the ref would have none of it.Different in the Scottish game sadly. Refs are under huge pressure when they ref the OF gamesIt is easier all round to give the OF the benefit of the doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.