SFA vs Hearts.

[Dr. Bapswent]

Weve all seen the shocking refereeing decisions all over Scotland against Hearts.

 

But I wouldnt want to suggest an SFA bias against only Hearts...not yet anyway.

 

Other teams have felt the brunt of the pro-OF stance of the SFA. Falkirk being one in question. John Hughes has been pretty much gagged with regards to what he can and cant say.

 

The papers are slowly but surely having to report what we have all know for some time.

 

They are uncovering the injustice, but is anyone listening? Or caring?

 

Ok, so Hearts dont get the decisions....thats true.

 

But what about other bigger stuff...

 

Is it not the case that the SFA retrospectively changed the rules to make Vlad accountable for his actions and words at the club, even though he wasnt actually down as a director...?

 

Surely thats just a case of moving the goalposts to suit the SFA?...isnt it.

 

And what about the retrospective rulings on 'simulation' brought in in the advent of Miko's 'dive' against Scotland?

 

Another case of changing the rules to suit themselves?

 

 

These are examples of not one but two fundamental rule changs that have been brought in under the guise of being good for the game, but are in fact, reactions to the way Hearts behave.

 

You want to think the SFA have no axe to grind with Hearts...ok...go ahead.

[Das Root]

The fact that the SFA gag managers, owners and the rest from EVER speaking out about decisions and refs etc is a disgrace. Whenever a manager talks about dodgy decisions to save the club from ??? they always have to say "nobody's fault of course, these things happen".

 

FFS, that's 1960s USSR there, talk and mysteriously disappear the week later.

 

The SFA run Scottish football for the benefit of two clubs and do all they can to ensure no other club will ever get close to them again. Hearts gave them a scare 2005 / 2006 and that's not going to be allowed to reoccur.

 

Scottish football is (unfortunately) forever going to be a duopoly.