Cliffundo Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Both are available for selection for tomorow. Please stevie do not even think about it. two clean sheets without them means more of the same please, remember it's all about consitency!! if they are in the squad, please have them on the bench at the very most! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cow Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Surely these two will not get a start after our efforts in the last 2 games, a seat on the bench at the most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jambolee90 Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 I get the feeling that Elliot will be involved. Would prefer Big Ben to come of the bench myself! Nade and Velicka will surely be the main 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffundo Posted January 29, 2008 Author Share Posted January 29, 2008 I get the feeling that Elliot will be involved. Would prefer Big Ben to come of the bench myself! Nade and Velicka will surely be the main 2. It's well documented that Frail rates clum, but surely he must realise that the laddie just does not cut the mustard. It must be a front two of Nade and velicka.... Clum can keep the bench warm for hatrick hero Velicka comming off after 85 min to a standing ovation and rapturous applause. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy52 Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Both are available for selection for tomorow. Please stevie do not even think about it. two clean sheets without them means more of the same please, remember it's all about consitency!! if they are in the squad, please have them on the bench at the very most! Still not convinced that Stevie will be allowed to 'think about it'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Busby ! Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Clum and Zal back for tomorrow ? One of them whacking the ball safely out of the danger area, the other involved in a veritable goalspree. Yes, I know exactly what I'm saying there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Merse Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 If I turn up and one or both of those players are playing, my stomach will turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
portobellojambo1 Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 If I turn up and one or both of those players are playing, my stomach will turn. Unfortunately I would not be at all surprised to see both of them in the starting line up, although neither actually deserves to be on Hearts books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chester copperpot Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 If Zal and Elliot are playing, then I'm fairly confident that Vlad has a hand in team selection. If Zal replaces Kari, or is in to shore up the midfield, I will go off my nut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunk-Section G Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 There is no way Zal should be in the first XI. What has Karapidis done to merit being dropped? He has been a rock in our defence and should continue his partnership with Berra. Nade has done well in the last two games and merits a start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meridian jambo Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 The good thing is it is only 5 subs, if we start with 2 up front (if!!) then Elliot maybe on the bench, if only 1 up front then Nade on bench, no room for Elliot (I hope), think Zaliukas will be on the bench though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffundo Posted January 29, 2008 Author Share Posted January 29, 2008 We also have chesney and Driver back... so there should be no need to have Zal supporting the midfield as we have Stewart Eggy and Ruben aswell. Even Miko deserves a game before Zal and Clum....... if it was midfield role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lambojambo Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 If Zal and Elliot are playing, then I'm fairly confident that Vlad has a hand in team selection. Zal maybe - but if Calum Idiot is in it will all be Stevie's work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jammy T Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Vlad likes to play Zali in midfield against the old firm Tomorrow's team selection is an acid test as to whether or not we can believe that Vlad is keeping his mits off. High profile game, on TV.....I am a little anxious personally Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Busby ! Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Cast your mind back to the 2-0 win at Darkheid. Wouldn't suprise me at all if they were to revert to exactly the formation and tactics for that night.... Remember how a tireless (...I'm serious...) Clum was praised to the heavens by Frailanov for running smellick ragged (ooh, me sides) leaving the way for Velicka to administer the coup de grace courtesy of Clums (ahem) magnificent shift ? So tomorrow ... 4-5-1 it'll be ... with Clum putting in aforementioned tireless shift ... Frailanov hoping that we keep it goalless (lets face it, its guaranteed to be that way if Clum plays) till 20 minutes to go ... and only then will we gamble for a win. Would that surprise anyone ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Old Tolbooth Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 No way should either of those pair of clowns be anywhere near our first team and if Frail has managed to grow a pair of balls yet then they wont be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tcjambo Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Zal possibly for the bench. Clum should be nowhere near the team. He has had only one half-decent game since the Celtic game 2 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cliffundo Posted January 29, 2008 Author Share Posted January 29, 2008 Cast your mind back to the 2-0 win at Darkheid. Wouldn't suprise me at all if they were to revert to exactly the formation and tactics for that night.... Remember how a tireless (...I'm serious...) Clum was praised to the heavens by Frailanov for running smellick ragged (ooh, me sides) leaving the way for Velicka to administer the coup de grace courtesy of Clums (ahem) magnificent shift ? So tomorrow ... 4-5-1 it'll be ... with Clum putting in aforementioned tireless shift ... Frailanov hoping that we keep it goalless till 20 minutes to go ... and only then will we gamble for a win. Would that surprise anyone ? Sounds very plausible. Also sounds very scary. I just think frail needs to be more realistic, Clum is not a very good footballer. If we go 5-4-1 which I think we will.... we will get picked off, Hampden is a lot larger than tynie and rangers will find space on the flanks and robbie will be exposed with his lack of pace. we need to fight fire with fire 4-4-2. Our squad can do them man for man! we just need to pick the right men in the right positions. Velicka on his own will be a mistake, we need to keep their back four busy and nade upfront with velicka, will do that. Remember they are going to be playing with a new defensive partnership at right back....Andy driver could have a big impact if selected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chester copperpot Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Zal maybe - but if Calum Idiot is in it will all be Stevie's work! Aye he does seem to rate Screech. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamboy81 Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Cast your mind back to the 2-0 win at Darkheid. Wouldn't suprise me at all if they were to revert to exactly the formation and tactics for that night.... Remember how a tireless (...I'm serious...) Clum was praised to the heavens by Frailanov for running smellick ragged (ooh, me sides) leaving the way for Velicka to administer the coup de grace courtesy of Clums (ahem) magnificent shift ? So tomorrow ... 4-5-1 it'll be ... with Clum putting in aforementioned tireless shift ... Frailanov hoping that we keep it goalless (lets face it, its guaranteed to be that way if Clum plays) till 20 minutes to go ... and only then will we gamble for a win. Would that surprise anyone ? Your constant negativity sickens me! Frail says he picks the team, we have won 2 consecutive matches and now have one of the best strikers in the SPL (if you believe the folk creaming themselves because Beniuses won a header). How do you expect the team to win with all this negativity? The game hasn't even kicked off and you already have us beat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Busby ! Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Sounds very plausible. Also sounds very scary. I just think frail needs to be more realistic, Clum is not a very good footballer. If we go 5-4-1 which I think we will.... we will get picked off, Hampden is a lot larger than tynie and rangers will find space on the flanks and robbie will be exposed with his lack of pace. we need to fight fire with fire 4-4-2. Our squad can do them man for man! we just need to pick the right men in the right positions. Velicka on his own will be a mistake, we need to keep their back four busy and nade upfront with velicka, will do that. Remember they are going to be playing with a new defensive partnership at right back....Andy driver could have a big impact if selected. Have to agree. One up front for most of the game would see the ball coming right back at us for 60 or 70 minutes. We're then left with just trusting to luck, or their poor finishing, that they don't score. If they go ahead, then our now legendarily poor comebackability leaves us hoping to scramble at best a 90-minute draw and hope for the best beyond that. Lets not put ourselves on the back foot FFS Shaggy ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tams bird Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 Never knew who clum was till i read this. Why the name Clum? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.