hughesie27 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 6 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said: There's 600 grand that the public donated that's disappeared. An enquiry seems reasonable. Imagine that was FOH money, we'd be demanding accountability. As members of FOH yes, we would. I doubt Kilmarnock fans would be.
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 26 minutes ago, hughesie27 said: Like anything substantial coming from the SFA/Celtic investigation. Nothing substantial will come out of this story beyond whatever sentence PM gets. There won't be any inquiry. It's also got nothing to do with the Scottish Gov, no public funds were swindled. It's a private party issue. Westminster getting involved. There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash. Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case?
hughesie27 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Just now, Jack Aubrey said: There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash. Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case? Has that been reported somewhere you could send me? I haven't seen that mentioned. If it proven to be the case then yes I'd expect they may well want to have a say.
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 (edited) 3 minutes ago, hughesie27 said: Has that been reported somewhere you could send me? I haven't seen that mentioned. If it proven to be the case then yes I'd expect they may well want to have a say. It’s been mentioned that it’s a possibility. Edited May 31 by Jack Aubrey
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 24 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: It’s nothing to do with the parliament, the police have concluded the case. It would be a waste of our money, nothing can be proved. That's the criminal side of things dealt with. What about the refusal to look at the books? Why the cover up on that? I don't think Ms Cherry is going away anytime soon on this and I don't blame her.
Hagar the Horrible Posted May 31 Posted May 31 LK questions her on should it be paid back, the look of horror on her face! I think she forgets there is a proceeds of crime act. Drug dealers wives dont get away with the house in their name. If she is nit liable for the missing funds then the SNP are, and every penny should be returned as it was to fund a second referendum which the SNP have no appetite to push for.
hughesie27 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 12 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: It’s been mentioned that it’s a possibility. By reputable sources? Or just hearsay wishful thinkers?
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 29 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said: There's 600 grand that the public donated that's disappeared. An enquiry seems reasonable. Imagine that was FOH money, we'd be demanding accountability. It was £400k, it’s a police matter, if it was FoH money I would want those responsible arrested, not discussed by a bunch of career politicians with no repercussions at the end of an expensive investigation.
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 24 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash. Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case? Not entirely sure the CEO of any party has access to government money, but I’m sure you can give us proof?
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 1 minute ago, Maroon Sailor said: She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?!
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?! Yeah, I think he's got that wrong 😂
Dirty Deeds Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: It was £400k, it’s a police matter, if it was FoH money I would want those responsible arrested, not discussed by a bunch of career politicians with no repercussions at the end of an expensive investigation. £666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared. £400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money?
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Big George wading in. I didn't know Murrell was a Corstorphine boy. He'll know Saughton quite well
Thunder and Lightning Posted May 31 Author Posted May 31 Do we know what Peter is taking the fall alone? What does she have on him that stops him explaining her level of involvement. Does not testifying against you spouse cover sham marriages as well?
Australis Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Murrell had to give the SNP a loan. Think he is still due the cash back. Why did they need a loan when he and wee Jimmy were running the accounts, saying everything was fine, nothing to see here stuff.
Mikey1874 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 13 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said: £666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared. £400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money? Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery.
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Well done Double Oh Nippy. Return to HQ. Mission accomplished.
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 25 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said: £666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared. £400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money? It’s party funds,not public money as in relating to the government, can’t remember if I gave them a tenner or not. I don’t know the ins and outs obviously, but I would imagine it was spent on the new Yes branding etc.
lost in space Posted May 31 Posted May 31 12 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said: Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery. Yes, a total mystery - that anybody would contribute but to such a crazy idea. Like collecting funds to celebrate Scotland winning the World Cup.
JudyJudyJudy Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 minutes ago, lost in space said: Like collecting funds to celebrate Scotland winning the World Cup.
robertlaird Posted May 31 Posted May 31 20 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said: Spot the difference That is brilliant fella.
John Findlay Posted May 31 Posted May 31 40 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said: Spot the difference The top photo is in Black and White?
Dick Dastardly Posted May 31 Posted May 31 4 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said: Cherry and Wings really have got no time for her Looking like she's a little cranky in that picture
manaliveits105 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said: Big George wading in. I didn't know Murrell was a Corstorphine boy. He'll know Saughton quite well Swinney oot
Elljay Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 hours ago, Mikey1874 said: Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery. Maybe not
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 3 hours ago, hughesie27 said: By reputable sources? Or just hearsay wishful thinkers? www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/comment/peter-murrell-almost-certainly-embezzled-37207341 www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/16318274/peter-murrell-snp-taxpayer-cash/
Korky Posted May 31 Posted May 31 4 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said: Aamer Anwar Sinister! Never buy a used car from him!
Francis Albert Posted May 31 Posted May 31 (edited) 3 hours ago, Pasquale for King said: She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?! I don't know about the Scottish media but she was a bit of a media darling in the London media for her media presentation of Scotland 's handling of Covid. I say presentation not action. She was good on presentation. Even touted by some for a big internatiomal job in the UN or the like. Fleeing to London too late I think. Edited May 31 by Francis Albert Typo
I P Knightley Posted May 31 Posted May 31 8 minutes ago, Francis Albert said: I don't know about the Scottish media but she was a bit of a media darling in the London media for her media presentation of Scotland 's handling of Covid. I say presentation not action. She was good on presentation. Even touted by some for a big internatiomal job in the UN or the like. Fleeing to London too late I think. Correct. There was a lot of positive reaction to her on COVID matters but you must remember that she was being compared to Boris Johnson.
hughesie27 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 50 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/comment/peter-murrell-almost-certainly-embezzled-37207341 www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/16318274/peter-murrell-snp-taxpayer-cash/ Nice one. From the Express article it says that the SNP basically just shove all moneybinto one account, so confirming that public funds were used would be quite a forensic excercise, youd literally need a transaction by transaction account to track if any money tipped into a Short Money area.
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 (edited) You wanted to know. There it is. But with such a sordid and corrupt couple like the Murrells, who knows what might come out next. Edited May 31 by Jack Aubrey
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 1 hour ago, Jack Aubrey said: www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/comment/peter-murrell-almost-certainly-embezzled-37207341 www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/16318274/peter-murrell-snp-taxpayer-cash/ That money was legally given to the SNP, he didn’t steal public money it was still the party’s money.
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 4 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: That money was legally given to the SNP, he didn’t steal public money it was still the party’s money. You keep believing. Good on you.
Pasquale for King Posted May 31 Posted May 31 2 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: You keep believing. Good on you. I’m not a believer in the SNP, or any weegie blawbag snakes, you and every other ****ing Unionist **** can moan all you want and share links from rags it makes no difference, he didn’t steal money from the public purse, because he didn’t have access to it.
Dirty Deeds Posted May 31 Posted May 31 John Crace sums it up nicely https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/may/31/nicola-sturgeon-interview-peter-murrell-snp-politics-sketch
lost in space Posted May 31 Posted May 31 1 hour ago, hughesie27 said: Nice one. From the Express article it says that the SNP basically just shove all moneybinto one account, so confirming that public funds were used would be quite a forensic excercise, youd literally need a transaction by transaction account to track if any money tipped into a Short Money area. So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then? Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds - unless there is something to hide of course......... As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov. Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though.
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 38 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said: I’m not a believer in the SNP, or any weegie blawbag snakes, you and every other ****ing Unionist **** can moan all you want and share links from rags it makes no difference, he didn’t steal money from the public purse, because he didn’t have access to it. That anger is what Sturgeon has done to Scottish people about fellow Scottish people. We are now identified by some as a Nationalist or a Unionist. Very Norn Iron Weegieland is very Norn Iron
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 6 minutes ago, lost in space said: So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then? Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds - unless there is something to hide of course......... As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov. Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though. I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money.
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. I wonder if Fiddler Murrell will ever spill the beans on who knew what or has his silence been bought? Edited May 31 by Maroon Sailor
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 6 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said: I wonder if Fiddler Murrell will ever spill the beans on who knew what or has his silence been bought? Theres undoubtedly been a deal made. His ‘wife’ has a hide like a rhino and with the odd tear here and there in interviews for effect will ride out the storm while Pete enjoys another type of ride in Saughton.
lost in space Posted May 31 Posted May 31 10 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. Maybe Peter had a strict moral code and made sure he only stole money from his own party. Cos thieves are known for differentiating who(m) they steal from.
Jack Aubrey Posted May 31 Posted May 31 1 minute ago, lost in space said: Maybe Peter had a strict moral code and made sure he only stole money from his own party. Cos thieves are known for differentiating who(m) they steal from. Keeping it in the family.
Maroon Sailor Posted May 31 Posted May 31 5 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: Theres undoubtedly been a deal made. His ‘wife’ has a hide like a rhino and with the odd tear here and there in interviews for effect will ride out the storm while Pete enjoys another type of ride in Saughton. He'll be out on the early release scheme. I wouldn't be surprised if Honest John has a limo sent to pick him up at the taxpayers expense.
hughesie27 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 33 minutes ago, lost in space said: So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then? Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds - unless there is something to hide of course......... As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov. Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though. Yes, exactly as I said. 24 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said: I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. Pointing out that as it stands no public money has been used and as a result there would be no reason for any Westminster inquiry is not the same as defending a convicted fraudster.
Mikey1874 Posted May 31 Posted May 31 Criminal prosecution over the care home Covid deaths remain her biggest challenge. Where employing the best criminal defence lawyer in Scotland and no comment interviews will be required.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now