Jump to content

The Nicola Sturgeon Thread


Recommended Posts

hughesie27
Posted
6 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

There's 600 grand that the public donated that's disappeared. An enquiry seems reasonable.

 

Imagine that was FOH money, we'd be demanding accountability.

As members of FOH yes, we would. I doubt Kilmarnock fans would be.

  • Replies 442
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Maroon Sailor

    101

  • JudyJudyJudy

    45

  • Dirty Deeds

    18

  • Dennis Denuto

    17

Jack Aubrey
Posted
26 minutes ago, hughesie27 said:

Like anything substantial coming from the SFA/Celtic investigation. Nothing substantial will come out of this story beyond whatever sentence PM gets. There won't be any inquiry. It's also got nothing to do with the Scottish Gov, no public funds were swindled. It's a private party issue. Westminster getting involved. :facepalm:

There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash.

 

Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case?

hughesie27
Posted
Just now, Jack Aubrey said:

There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash.

 

Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case?

Has that been reported somewhere you could send me? I haven't seen that mentioned. If it proven to be the case then yes I'd expect they may well want to have a say. 

 

Jack Aubrey
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, hughesie27 said:

Has that been reported somewhere you could send me? I haven't seen that mentioned. If it proven to be the case then yes I'd expect they may well want to have a say. 

 

It’s been mentioned that it’s a possibility. 

Edited by Jack Aubrey
Maroon Sailor
Posted
24 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

It’s nothing to do with the parliament, the police have concluded the case. 
It would be a waste of our money, nothing can be proved. 

 

That's the criminal side of things dealt with.

 

What about the refusal to look at the books? Why the cover up on that?

 

I don't think Ms Cherry is going away anytime soon on this and I don't blame her.

 

Screenshot_20260531_132921_X.thumb.jpg.6f71d248fa4c58f269040822b253768e.jpg

Hagar the Horrible
Posted

LK questions her on should it be paid back, the look of horror on her face!

 

I think she forgets there is a proceeds of crime act. Drug dealers wives dont get away with the house in their name. If she is nit liable for the missing funds then the SNP are, and every penny should be returned as it was to fund a second referendum which the SNP have no appetite to push for.

hughesie27
Posted
12 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

It’s been mentioned that it’s a possibility. 

By reputable sources? Or just hearsay wishful thinkers?

Pasquale for King
Posted
29 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

There's 600 grand that the public donated that's disappeared. An enquiry seems reasonable.

 

Imagine that was FOH money, we'd be demanding accountability.

It was £400k, it’s a police matter, if it was FoH money I would want those responsible arrested, not discussed by a bunch of career politicians with no repercussions at the end of an expensive investigation. 

Maroon Sailor
Posted

Screenshot_20260531_134017_X.thumb.jpg.c29503d219f76adf3b55ffdc8d67ab51.jpg

Pasquale for King
Posted
24 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

There’s a possibility that short money from Westminster might have been included in Pete’s splurges. That’s taxpayer cash.

 

Why would Westminster not be involved if that was the case?

Not entirely sure the CEO of any party has access to government money, but I’m sure you can give us proof?

Pasquale for King
Posted
1 minute ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Screenshot_20260531_134017_X.thumb.jpg.c29503d219f76adf3b55ffdc8d67ab51.jpg

She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?!

Maroon Sailor
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?!

 

Yeah, I think he's got that wrong 😂

Dirty Deeds
Posted
2 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

It was £400k, it’s a police matter, if it was FoH money I would want those responsible arrested, not discussed by a bunch of career politicians with no repercussions at the end of an expensive investigation. 

£666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared.

 

£400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money?

Maroon Sailor
Posted

Big George wading in. I didn't know Murrell was a Corstorphine boy. He'll know Saughton quite well

 

Screenshot_20260531_134751_X.thumb.jpg.36451c3230fd0384727f4ebca376baba.jpg

Thunder and Lightning
Posted

Do we know what Peter is taking the fall alone? 

 

What does she have on him that stops him explaining her level of involvement. Does not testifying against you spouse cover sham marriages as well? 

Australis
Posted

Murrell had to give the SNP a loan.

Think he is still due the cash back.

 

Why did they need a loan when he and wee Jimmy were running the accounts, saying everything was fine, nothing to see here stuff.

Mikey1874
Posted
13 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

£666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared.

 

£400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money?

 

Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery.

Maroon Sailor
Posted

Well done Double Oh Nippy. Return to HQ. Mission accomplished.

 

20260531_140759.thumb.jpg.9f86957565b83d0ac017bf70339b86fc.jpg

 

 

 

 

Pasquale for King
Posted
25 minutes ago, Dirty Deeds said:

£666,953 was the amount raised by the SNP from Independence supporters to fund a second Independence referendum campaign. That money has disappeared.

 

£400,310 was the total Murrell was convicted on embezzling, so where is the rest of that public money?

It’s party funds,not public money as in relating to the government, can’t remember if I gave them a tenner or not. 
I don’t know the ins and outs obviously, but I would imagine it was spent on the new Yes branding etc. 

lost in space
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery.

Yes, a total mystery - that anybody would contribute but to such a crazy idea.

Like collecting funds to celebrate Scotland winning the World Cup.

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
2 minutes ago, lost in space said:

Like collecting funds to celebrate Scotland winning the World Cup.

:D

Maroon Sailor
Posted

Spot the difference

 

20260531_143910.thumb.jpg.18b9d50d3dfef4d8da44aa4492dcd7c3.jpg

 

20260531_143919.jpg.860007fc43ad59d8f98897f417468333.jpg

robertlaird
Posted
20 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Spot the difference

 

20260531_143910.thumb.jpg.18b9d50d3dfef4d8da44aa4492dcd7c3.jpg

 

20260531_143919.jpg.860007fc43ad59d8f98897f417468333.jpg

That is brilliant fella.

 

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
38 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Spot the difference

 

20260531_143910.thumb.jpg.18b9d50d3dfef4d8da44aa4492dcd7c3.jpg

 

20260531_143919.jpg.860007fc43ad59d8f98897f417468333.jpg

 

image-23-10-21-12-13-4.gif

John Findlay
Posted
40 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Spot the difference

 

20260531_143910.thumb.jpg.18b9d50d3dfef4d8da44aa4492dcd7c3.jpg

 

20260531_143919.jpg.860007fc43ad59d8f98897f417468333.jpg

The top photo is in Black and White?

Dick Dastardly
Posted
4 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Cherry and Wings really have got no time for her

 

Screenshot_20260531_112640_X.thumb.jpg.68048b4e6af77e4c1697e1409537a246.jpg

Looking like she's a little cranky in that picture 

manaliveits105
Posted
2 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Big George wading in. I didn't know Murrell was a Corstorphine boy. He'll know Saughton quite well

 

Screenshot_20260531_134751_X.thumb.jpg.36451c3230fd0384727f4ebca376baba.jpg

Swinney oot 

Elljay
Posted
2 hours ago, Mikey1874 said:

 

Different money quite possibly. The independence money remains a complete mystery.

Maybe not

image.thumb.jpeg.386553fe021adb2bbb36f751426175bc.jpeg

Posted
4 hours ago, Maroon Sailor said:

 

Aamer Anwar

 

Aamer-Anwar.thumb.jpg.467db5953eff52fffdba56ca1948ab22.jpg

Sinister!
Never buy a used car from him!
 

Francis Albert
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Pasquale for King said:

She did win elections but in no way was she a darling of the media ffs 😆🤪?!?!

I don't know about the Scottish media but she was a bit of a media darling in the London media for her media presentation of Scotland 's handling of Covid. I say presentation not action. She was good on presentation. Even touted by some for a big internatiomal job in the UN or the like. Fleeing to London too late I think.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Francis Albert
Typo
I P Knightley
Posted
8 minutes ago, Francis Albert said:

I don't know about the Scottish media but she was a bit of a media darling in the London media for her media presentation of Scotland 's handling of Covid. I say presentation not action. She was good on presentation. Even touted by some for a big internatiomal job in the UN or the like. Fleeing to London too late I think.

 

 

 

 

Correct.

 

There was a lot of positive reaction to her on COVID matters but you must remember that she was being compared to Boris Johnson.

hughesie27
Posted
50 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

Nice one. From the Express article it says that the SNP basically just shove all moneybinto one account, so confirming that public funds were used would be quite a forensic excercise, youd literally need a transaction by transaction account to track if any money tipped into a Short Money area.

Jack Aubrey
Posted (edited)

You wanted to know. There it is. But with such a sordid and corrupt couple like the Murrells, who knows what might come out next. 

Edited by Jack Aubrey
Jack Aubrey
Posted
4 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

That money was legally given to the SNP, he didn’t steal public money it was still the party’s money. 

You keep believing. Good on you. 

Pasquale for King
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

You keep believing. Good on you. 

I’m not a believer in the SNP, or any weegie blawbag snakes, you and every other ****ing Unionist **** can moan all you want and share links from rags it makes no difference, he didn’t steal money from the public purse, because he didn’t have access to it. 

lost in space
Posted
1 hour ago, hughesie27 said:

Nice one. From the Express article it says that the SNP basically just shove all moneybinto one account, so confirming that public funds were used would be quite a forensic excercise, youd literally need a transaction by transaction account to track if any money tipped into a Short Money area.

So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then?

Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds -  unless there is something to hide of course.........

As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov.

Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though.

Maroon Sailor
Posted
38 minutes ago, Pasquale for King said:

I’m not a believer in the SNP, or any weegie blawbag snakes, you and every other ****ing Unionist **** can moan all you want and share links from rags it makes no difference, he didn’t steal money from the public purse, because he didn’t have access to it. 

 

That anger is what Sturgeon has done to Scottish people about fellow Scottish people. We are now identified by some as a Nationalist or a Unionist.

 

Very Norn Iron

 

Weegieland is very Norn Iron

Jack Aubrey
Posted
6 minutes ago, lost in space said:

So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then?

Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds -  unless there is something to hide of course.........

As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov.

Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though.

I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. 
 

 

Maroon Sailor
Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. 
 

 

 

I wonder if Fiddler Murrell will ever spill the beans on who knew what or has his silence been bought?

 

Edited by Maroon Sailor
Maroon Sailor
Posted

Here's the fat Hibs ***** talking pish.

 

 

Taffin
Posted

Sturgeon? I'm absolutely convinced she's a Unionist plant. 

Jack Aubrey
Posted
6 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said:

 

I wonder if Fiddler Murrell will ever spill the beans on who knew what or has his silence been bought?

 

Theres undoubtedly been a deal made.

 

His ‘wife’ has a hide like a rhino and with the odd tear here and there in interviews for effect will ride out  the storm while Pete enjoys another type of ride in Saughton.

lost in space
Posted
10 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. 
 

 

Maybe Peter had a strict moral code and made sure he only stole money from his own party.

Cos thieves are known for differentiating who(m) they steal from.

Jack Aubrey
Posted
1 minute ago, lost in space said:

Maybe Peter had a strict moral code and made sure he only stole money from his own party.

Cos thieves are known for differentiating who(m) they steal from.

Keeping it in the family.

Maroon Sailor
Posted
5 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

Theres undoubtedly been a deal made.

 

His ‘wife’ has a hide like a rhino and with the odd tear here and there in interviews for effect will ride out  the storm while Pete enjoys another type of ride in Saughton.

 

He'll be out on the early release scheme. I wouldn't be surprised if Honest John has a limo sent to pick him up at the taxpayers expense.

hughesie27
Posted
33 minutes ago, lost in space said:

So just needs a forensic accountant to do what they do then?

Swinney will surely get one on the case to prove it was only SNP funds -  unless there is something to hide of course.........

As CEO, Murrell would surely have the ability to access Gov Funds, since SNP are the Gov.

Maybe wee Peter just likes stealing from dafties though.

Yes, exactly as I said.

24 minutes ago, Jack Aubrey said:

I don’t know why some on here are so defensive over whether Pete did or did not include the public purse when he was spending other folks money. 
 

 

Pointing out that as it stands no public money has been used and as a result there would be no reason for any Westminster inquiry is not the same as defending a convicted fraudster.

Mikey1874
Posted

Criminal prosecution over the care home Covid deaths remain her biggest challenge.

 

Where employing the best criminal defence lawyer in Scotland and no comment interviews will be required.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...