The wonderful world of Reform Ltd

[Auld Reekin']

1 hour ago, Glasgowben said:

Then why does he defend the borders so well?   Cares about the country lol

 

"defend the borders so well..."  

 

Since Brexit and the consequent disruption in the previous relationship with the relevant French authorities, the number of "illegal immigrants" attempting to cross the channel in "small boats" has risen hugely. This was entirely predictable and - indeed - inevitable.

 

Farage almost certainly knew this was going to happen (but kept schtum about it, for some reason...). Could this be because he knew it would that this would directly play into his hands, post Brexit, given that it'd be brown, non-"Christian", people coming into the country rather than the predominantly white, European, "Christian", who were coming to live and work in the UK under EU freedom of movement and that this would enrage the xenophobic britnat morons who form his core support?

 

 

 

[Dick Dastardly]

5 minutes ago, Glasgowben said:

no cause he only blew the whistle. 

Yup. He does like to blow that dog whistle.

[El Prez]

Jambo in Hamilton never used to start his sentences with a capital letter either.

 

Apropos of nothing, really.

[Cade]

I love it when Cruella Braverman bangs on about how previous Governments were terrible on immigration and Deform is our only hope.

Only, she was Immigration Minister at the time.

Daft bint.

Edited April 20 by Cade

[The Real Maroonblood]

2 hours ago, Glasgowben said:

Nigel would actually make a good prime minister.

[The Mighty Thor]

41 minutes ago, Cade said:

I love it when Cruella Braverman bangs on about how previous Governments were terrible on immigration and Deform is our only hope.

Only, she was Immigration Minister at the time.

Daft bint.

It was on her watch that the 'invasion' hit its peak.

 

She knows her shit does Sue Ellen

[Gundermann]

Just as well the Polish and Czech pilots in the Battle of Britain could fly better than Farage.

 

[Statts1976uk]

English dough products for English people! Croissants are not welcome in Hartlepool!!

[ScotsAndy]

Wonder how Nige is going to spin Trumps next dig  - that the Falkland should be handed back to Argentina  - should be a squirm fest.

[Gundermann]

15 hours ago, Statts1976uk said:

English dough products for English people! Croissants are not welcome in Hartlepool!!

 

1 hour ago, ScotsAndy said:

Wonder how Nige is going to spin Trumps next dig  - that the Falkland should be handed back to Argentina  - should be a squirm fest.

 

 to both. Does Storey live in the ward or a ward?

 

Didn't hear about Trump's Malvinas take. Great stuff!

 

 

[Tazio]

[Statts1976uk]

[Ulysses]

 

[Gundermann]

Former Reform councillor annoys neighbours by flying flags celebrating some Palestinian religious figure.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c62l216yy8eo

[Cade]

Deform held a "MASSIVE FUEL PROTEST" today.

After a couple of hours, their open-top battle bus was joined by 1 black cab and a grand total of 23 protestors.
There was more press there than anybody else.

Parade got cancelled.

 

Edited April 28 by Cade

[Gundermann]

18 minutes ago, Cade said:

Deform held a "MASSIVE FUEL PROTEST" today.

After a couple of hours, their open-top battle bus was joined by 1 black cab and a grand total of 23 protestors.
There was more press there than anybody else.

Parade got cancelled.

 

 

Pictured here. 😄

 

 

 

[trotter]

On 20/04/2026 at 13:02, Gundermann said:

Just as well the Polish and Czech pilots in the Battle of Britain could fly better than Farage.

 

I think it was 308 Czech and 310 Polish squadrons? I can't recall which at the minute, but i'm sure one of them racked up more kills than any other squadron during the BoB, including the RAF, they were good pilots, but when put in a Spitfire or Hurricane they were absolutely ******* lethal. 

[SwindonJambo]

8 minutes ago, trotter said:

I think it was 308 Czech and 310 Polish squadrons? I can't recall which at the minute, but i'm sure one of them racked up more kills than any other squadron during the BoB, including the RAF, they were good pilots, but when put in a Spitfire or Hurricane they were absolutely ******* lethal. 

The Polish Squadrons were 302 for Hurricanes & 303 for Spitfires. Given that most of their country had been annexed by the Nazis the previous year (with the Soviets taking the rest), they were extraordinarily highly motivated. 

[Nookie Bear]

12 hours ago, Cade said:

Deform held a "MASSIVE FUEL PROTEST" today.

After a couple of hours, their open-top battle bus was joined by 1 black cab and a grand total of 23 protestors.
There was more press there than anybody else.

Parade got cancelled.

 

 

11 hours ago, Gundermann said:

 

Pictured here. 😄

 

 

 

 

It's a weird situation where a Labour government is happy to sit back and let BP's profits more than doiuble since the Iran invasion started and let the man on the street foot the bill.

 

Nobody is going to back a Reform protest but there should be more direct action being taken right now, including agreeing to Reform's request to roll back the fuel duty increase planned for September. 

 

[Nookie Bear]

On 20/04/2026 at 19:02, Gundermann said:

Just as well the Polish and Czech pilots in the Battle of Britain could fly better than Farage.

 

 

I doubt anyone in the UK has a single issue with Poles and Czechs. The Poles in particular have the lowest unemployment rate in the UK*

 

*highest inactivity amongst adults of working age is in the gypsy/traveller community, closely followed by Arabs.

Edited April 29 by Nookie Bear

[Gundermann]

4 minutes ago, Nookie Bear said:

 

 

It's a weird situation where a Labour government is happy to sit back and let BP's profits more than doiuble since the Iran invasion started and let the man on the street foot the bill.

 

Nobody is going to back a Reform protest but there should be more direct action being taken right now, including agreeing to Reform's request to roll back the fuel duty increase planned for September. 

 

 

Some good points though Farage supported this war and has links to Putin who is also benefiting. 

[Nookie Bear]

Just now, Gundermann said:

 

Some good points though Farage supported this war and has links to Putin who is also benefiting. 

Farage will do whatever Trump wants.

 

But it is Labour who are letting this situation directly harm UK citizens.

[Dennis Reynolds]

£5million 'gift' that Farage didn't declare has been referred to the parliamentry standards commissioner.

 

Robert Jenrick being investigated by the police over some dodgy donations as well.

 

Thank **** it wasn't some pairs of glasses or they'd be really ****ed though.

 

 

[Victorian]

24 minutes ago, Dennis Reynolds said:

£5million 'gift' that Farage didn't declare has been referred to the parliamentry standards commissioner.

 

Robert Jenrick being investigated by the police over some dodgy donations as well.

 

Thank **** it wasn't some pairs of glasses or they'd be really ****ed though.

 

 

 

Reform's PR machine is so laser focused that they tried to explain that the £5m gift was for security because of a firebombing incident that was seemingly directed towards Farage.   Trouble is that the incident actually occurred well after the gift was made.   Then of course the clarification that what they meant to say was that the firebombing is an example of the thing he needs security against.

 

Then there's the curiosity that,  as an MP,  he actually receives state funded security.   Reform's genius PR boffins weren't aware of course.   They said he receives no state funded security.

 

Now it's actually a purely personal gift he got... from the regular Reform UK DONOR.   Isn't that then taxable?   As if.

[The Mighty Thor]

1 hour ago, Victorian said:

 

Reform's PR machine is so laser focused that they tried to explain that the £5m gift was for security because of a firebombing incident that was seemingly directed towards Farage.   Trouble is that the incident actually occurred well after the gift was made.   Then of course the clarification that what they meant to say was that the firebombing is an example of the thing he needs security against.

 

Then there's the curiosity that,  as an MP,  he actually receives state funded security.   Reform's genius PR boffins weren't aware of course.   They said he receives no state funded security.

 

Now it's actually a purely personal gift he got... from the regular Reform UK DONOR.   Isn't that then taxable?   As if.

He needs to speak to Dickie Tice.

He's a creative sort when it comes to tax matters.

 

Maybe this explains how the grifter paid 850K cash for the house he forgot he'd bought, then it was her that bought it even though she's pot-less?

[Gundermann]

13 hours ago, Dennis Reynolds said:

£5million 'gift' that Farage didn't declare has been referred to the parliamentry standards commissioner.

 

Robert Jenrick being investigated by the police over some dodgy donations as well.

 

Thank **** it wasn't some pairs of glasses or they'd be really ****ed though.

 

 

 

Don't worry.

 

I'm sure that a "crypto-tycoon" based in Thailand only has the interests of the white English working class at heart and that he and Farage will regenerate these forgotten communities.

Edited April 30 by Gundermann

[Lovecraft]

 

[Nookie Bear]

19 hours ago, Lovecraft said:

 

 

Firstly, I would urge anyone to see him live because it is a fantastic experience.

 

Secondly, with a few adjustmentsa there is nothing he said there that could not be said in the Commons.

[Gundermann]

On 30/04/2026 at 15:58, Lovecraft said:

 

 

In a nutshell.

[hughesie27]

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

[The Real Maroonblood]

28 minutes ago, hughesie27 said:

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

[Dennis Reynolds]

****ing hell.

[Nookie Bear]

1 hour ago, hughesie27 said:

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

 

Surely you put the centres where they will be most welcomed?

 

Rachel Millward will be thrilled 

[milky_26]

1 hour ago, hughesie27 said:

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

straight out of farages buddy trumps playbook

[Joey J J Jr Shabadoo]

11 minutes ago, milky_26 said:

straight out of farages buddy trumps playbook

Nonce-sensical.

[Shooter McGavin]

2 hours ago, hughesie27 said:

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

A win-win to be fair.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

18 minutes ago, Shooter McGavin said:

A win-win to be fair.

 

Exactly. Everyone gets what they want. 

[Gundermann]

4 hours ago, hughesie27 said:

A new policy! 

Well "new" https://www.facebook.com/share/p/18Bjrc7mRK/

 

Today we announce a new policy:

In order to deport all illegal migrants in Britain, Reform will need to detain tens of thousands at a time.

Migrants will not be able to leave these detention centres, and each will be held there a couple of weeks before being deported.

So here’s our promise:

A Reform government will not put any migrant detention facilities in any constituency with a Reform MP.

Nor will we put them where Reform controls the council.

And of the remaining areas, we will prioritise Green controlled parliamentary constituencies and Green controlled councils to locate the detention centres.

Put simply, if you vote in a Reform council or Reform MP, we guarantee you won’t have a detention centre near you.

If you vote Green, there’s a good chance you will.

This is an important exercise in democratic consent, not just for our mass deportation policy, but for where the detention centres are placed.

Given Zack Polanski openly advocates for open borders, we look forward to their warm embrace of this policy.

 

Just saw that. Jeezo... like Trump on stilts.

 

 

[XB52]

16 minutes ago, Gundermann said:

 

Just saw that. Jeezo... like Trump on stilts.

 

 

Vote reform you are supporting racists, end of story. 

[kingantti1874]

 

Another sensible policy from reform.  Genuinely baffling how some of you don’t seem to understand that importing millions of economic dependents is a terrible idea. Puts pressure on hospitals, dentists, schools, prisons and adding to a benefits bill which is already partly responsible for bankrupting the nation.  We won’t even talk about the social, cultural problems. 
 

if anyone wants to come here, into a high value job, contribute and integrate properly assuming  western values then they are most welcome.  
 

for everyone else, they weaken this country. I’ll be voting reform 100% despite the petty name calling of some brainwashed lefties who don’t know any better 

[Victorian]

Would never see the light of day in any meaningful way.   Which they know full well.   But the votes being sought from it will believe it all.   Which is all that matters.

 

When people can be fooled into giving their vote for what they think should happen,  without thinking about what can happen.   As long as the blame can be put on others,  it's just a slightly different version of the same grievance politics sleight of hand.

[Costanza]

So if you vote Reform in say Brighton, you get get a detention centre as some form of collective punishment?

Are Reform for PR now?

The Reform migration policy with a declining birthrate abd ageing population doesn't make any economic coherence.

These people just simply aren't serous politicians.,

[kingantti1874]

8 minutes ago, Costanza said:

So if you vote Reform in say Brighton, you get get a detention centre as some form of collective punishment?

Are Reform for PR now?

The Reform migration policy with a declining birthrate abd ageing population doesn't make any economic coherence.

These people just simply aren't serous politicians.,

The people we are importing are incapable of making up the the declining work age population.  

instead of having to invest hundreds of billions to attemp (and fail) to account for  the 12 million or so immigrants we should have been focused on the people already here, rewarding hard work, tackling the tax bill and cost of living.  Attempted to keep our best and brightest instead of happily waving them off to be replaced by yet more needy benefit claimants with questionable cultural values.  We had enough of them already.  
 

How much evidence do you need that the policies of the last 20 years have been a total failure.  Scotland and the UK are a shadow of what we once were and a combination of left wing policies are the main reason.

 

 

Edited May 4 by kingantti1874

[kingantti1874]

12 minutes ago, Victorian said:

Would never see the light of day in any meaningful way.   Which they know full well.   But the votes being sought from it will believe it all.   Which is all that matters.

 

When people can be fooled into giving their vote for what they think should happen,  without thinking about what can happen.   As long as the blame can be put on others,  it's just a slightly different version of the same grievance politics sleight of hand.

for a second I thought you were talking about the SNP promise of a referendum and the latest pile of supposed freebies we can’t afford  😂

Edited May 4 by kingantti1874

[Victorian]

Just now, kingantti1874 said:

jeez for a second I thought you were talking about the SNP promise of a referendum 😂

 

Is an obvious equivalence to draw I suppose.   But I don't remember the SNP ever seeking votes on the prospectus of promising collective punishment on unionist voting areas.

 

Anyway,  vote for it by all means.   It's perfectly legitimate as long as you remember to blame those making the promises if you don't see it being delivered.   If you get fooled into blaming someone else then you're being exploited.   Again.

[kingantti1874]

6 minutes ago, Victorian said:

 

Is an obvious equivalence to draw I suppose.   But I don't remember the SNP ever seeking votes on the prospectus of promising collective punishment on unionist voting areas.

 

Anyway,  vote for it by all means.   It's perfectly legitimate as long as you remember to blame those making the promises if you don't see it being delivered.   If you get fooled into blaming someone else then you're being exploited.   Again.

I’ve been exploited for years mate by people I didn’t vote for.  Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the very definition of madness. 
 

again with your whole second paragraph it really could be directed towards the last 20 years of SNP rule and the great independence lie. 

Edited May 4 by kingantti1874

[Lovecraft]

 

Thank **** none of the people involved with Brexit are claiming to fix the problem they created.

 

 

 

 

[Victorian]

1 minute ago, kingantti1874 said:

I’ve been exploited for years mate by people I didn’t vote for.  Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is the very definition of madness. 
 

again with your whole second paragraph it really could be directed towards the last 20 years of SNP rule and the great independence lie. 

 

Fine.   

 

It's a novel bit of electioneering in the UK.   Culture wars extending to promising actual punishment.   Only notionally of course because it stands no chance of ever happening on a scale beyond one or two window dressing examples.   Gimmicks.

 

Politics usually follows precendents being set and normalised.   Normalised retribution for voting the other way,  even the perception of,  seems like an iffy road to go down.

[Lovecraft]

3 minutes ago, Victorian said:

 

Fine.   

 

It's a novel bit of electioneering in the UK.   Culture wars extending to promising actual punishment.   Only notionally of course because it stands no chance of ever happening on a scale beyond one or two window dressing examples.   Gimmicks.

 

Politics usually follows precendents being set and normalised.   Normalised retribution for voting the other way,  even the perception of,  seems like an iffy road to go down.

Ahhhhh, but we tried, there was just no legal way we could do what we promised.

 

The bitcoin tycoon in Thailand got the contract to build the concentration camps though and all the Reform MPs managed to buy a 6th house while paying less tax than Dave the Asda worker.

 

 

Edited May 4 by Lovecraft

[Ron Burgundy]

Why is this punitive? If you want more migrants and are happy for unvetted males in your community surely this isn’t a problem. It’s only seen as punitive by hypocrites.