Jump to content

Is there anything in politics more shit than the Labour Party?


Recommended Posts

jack D and coke
Posted
34 minutes ago, Japan Jambo said:

 

to be fair it's 10k each capped at 4 per family, but yeah bonkers.

Is it ok..but anyway…

Just empty them ffs what is the matter with this country man🤷🏽‍♂️

 

  • Replies 8.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • JudyJudyJudy

    751

  • Gundermann

    562

  • jack D and coke

    457

  • The Mighty Thor

    446

The Mighty Thor
Posted
1 hour ago, kingantti1874 said:


was austerity the problem or new Labour / labour racking up trillions of pounds of debt. 
 

pointing the finger at those attempting (however badly) to fix it has never been the right answer.  
 

borrowing more and more and more will never ever be the right answer as it has to be offset by crushing taxes.  
 

the only problem with austerity is it don’t go far enough to pay down the debt and get us out of this shit.  But it will happen sometime.  It’s unavoidable. 

2010.

 

Money is the cheapest it'll ever be. 

 

You can either invest with cheap money building your military & civilian infrastructure, getting your country ready for whatever the future holds 

Or

You can cut everything, absolutely everything, and leave the country on the bones of its arse?

 

Austerity was never, ever going to pay down anything. 

 

The Tories have been in power for 32 of the years since that horrible cow Thatcher came in and since then they've sold off everything of value and left the country with nothing.

 

The other side of the coin is that Britain is a tin pot country and we've probably got a military in line with the stature of a country of our size and fiscal means. 

Posted (edited)

Untitled.png :levein_interesting:

Edited by Cade
Maroon Sailor
Posted

Our Defence Secretary

 

 

Maroon Sailor
Posted

Read today more people (men) have come over by boats than there is personnel in the Army, Navy and RAF combined, since Labour came to power in July 24.

The Mighty Thor
Posted
18 minutes ago, Maroon Sailor said:

Read today more people (men) have come over by boats than there is personnel in the Army, Navy and RAF combined, since Labour came to power in July 24.

'Fighting aged' men?

 

Its easy to check the number of people entering the UK by 'illegal' routes as the Government publish them on their website every single week. 

 

The 'number' they've got is roughly 65,000 although that's not split by gender. It also doesn't account for those returned. 

 

The 'regular' personnel in the UK military is around 135,000.

 

Statistics and sources eh?

bertracoon
Posted
5 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

'Fighting aged' men?

 

Its easy to check the number of people entering the UK by 'illegal' routes as the Government publish them on their website every single week. 

 

The 'number' they've got is roughly 65,000 although that's not split by gender. It also doesn't account for those returned. 

 

The 'regular' personnel in the UK military is around 135,000.

 

Statistics and sources eh?

 Never let the truth get in the way of a good story...

JudyJudyJudy
Posted

They really aren’t hiding it now 

good article from Matt 

 

Dennis Denuto
Posted

If Labour are making political decisions they do not think are correct just to get 6% of the electorate to maybe vote for them then their really is not anything-in-politics-more-shit-than-the-labour-party

Posted

So Starmer was aware that Mandelson’s close friendship with Epstein continued long after he was a convicted beast, and was warned of the reputational risk this caused. Still chose to go ahead and appoint him as ambassador 😂.

 

His position is surely now untenable. 

Serge Pizzorno
Posted
2 hours ago, Dennis Denuto said:

If Labour are making political decisions they do not think are correct just to get 6% of the electorate to maybe vote for them then their really is not anything-in-politics-more-shit-than-the-labour-party

6% now but just wait it'll be 60% at least this time next year.

 

So I'm led to believe by X users/Nigel Farage/Rupert Lowe/British right wing funded press

Kells_On_Jackson
Posted

How come Starmer hasn't been fired yet? Genuinely wondering as it was reported a few weeks back that he would be and he's still here?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Serge Pizzorno said:

6% now but just wait it'll be 60% at least this time next year.

 

So I'm led to believe by X users/Nigel Farage/Rupert Lowe/British right wing funded press

You missed a few posters on here

Serge Pizzorno
Posted
1 hour ago, Kells_On_Jackson said:

How come Starmer hasn't been fired yet? Genuinely wondering as it was reported a few weeks back that he would be and he's still here?

 

I’m no Starmer fan, but he is nowhere near as bad as what some make out to be.  On the whole he’s done ok, much better than some of our PM’s the last 10 years. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, Serge Pizzorno said:

I’m no Starmer fan, but he is nowhere near as bad as what some make out to be.  On the whole he’s done ok, much better than some of our PM’s the last 10 years. 

Not a great fan either but the alternatives are terrifying. Babanook or Falange ! Jeez ! 🫣

Kells_On_Jackson
Posted

See that's the thing, I  know he's about as popular over there as Don the con is over here. But he did stand up to Don on the Iran thing and have to give him some props for that, didn't just blindly jump in with both feet.

Posted

Deform and their rabid press pals are just determined to take advantage of their flash-in-the-pan poll ratings and are manufacturing crisis after crisis in some pathetic attempt to have Labour replace Starmer then call a snap election (which they won't do)

 

It's all rather sad, really.

Serge Pizzorno
Posted
16 minutes ago, Kells_On_Jackson said:

See that's the thing, I  know he's about as popular over there as Don the con is over here. But he did stand up to Don on the Iran thing and have to give him some props for that, didn't just blindly jump in with both feet.

The right wing use that as a slant on him, but if he jumped in and joined the war he’d get crucified for it, I actually feel bad for the man, he cannot win with the Tory/Reform backed press and a large portion of our population form their way of thinking based on what they’re fed by them 

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
2 hours ago, Kells_On_Jackson said:

How come Starmer hasn't been fired yet? Genuinely wondering as it was reported a few weeks back that he would be and he's still here?

 

Cause the rest of his cabinet are as hopeless as him.  So what would be the point?

Posted
8 minutes ago, Serge Pizzorno said:

The right wing use that as a slant on him, but if he jumped in and joined the war he’d get crucified for it, I actually feel bad for the man, he cannot win with the Tory/Reform backed press and a large portion of our population form their way of thinking based on what they’re fed by them 

 

That's one of Sir Keef Stammer's New New Labour's major failings.

They're constantly chasing right wing headlines, trying to mollify a hostile press that will never be happy no matter what he does.

So they should just concentrate on following their own program and let the right wing frothers froth away.

Of course, the fact that Sir Keef Stammer's New New Labour don't seem to have a plan of their own is another major failing.

Japan Jambo
Posted
23 hours ago, Kells_On_Jackson said:

How come Starmer hasn't been fired yet? Genuinely wondering as it was reported a few weeks back that he would be and he's still here?

 

 

Because, incredibly, he is the best the Labour party has...

Diadora Van Basten
Posted

Apparently the member of the Government that convinced Starmer not to attack Iran was Ed Miliband. I had forgotten he was part of the Government but he might be a potential replacement for Starmer as the rest of the cabinet were picked by Mandelson and McSweeney and will continue the same awful policies as Starmer.

The Mighty Thor
Posted

This is a truly gut wrenching read. 

 

Labour have got to go. 

 

Screenshot_20260313_074418_Bluesky.thumb.jpg.4a91a05b9cd94cb8e30ef18567a0d99c.jpg

 

#prayfortaxdodgingracisthalfwits 🙏

Dennis Denuto
Posted
11 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

This is a truly gut wrenching read. 

 

Labour have got to go. 

 

Screenshot_20260313_074418_Bluesky.thumb.jpg.4a91a05b9cd94cb8e30ef18567a0d99c.jpg

 

#prayfortaxdodgingracisthalfwits 🙏

There are loads of safe countries between the Middle East and the UK they could go to 

Joey J J Jr Shabadoo
Posted
51 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

This is a truly gut wrenching read. 

 

Labour have got to go. 

 

Screenshot_20260313_074418_Bluesky.thumb.jpg.4a91a05b9cd94cb8e30ef18567a0d99c.jpg

 

#prayfortaxdodgingracisthalfwits 🙏

:sob:

Posted
43 minutes ago, Dennis Denuto said:

There are loads of safe countries between the Middle East and the UK they could go to 

😀😀 nice one

Posted

"Fighting age man with military training living in a Muslim nation who wants to claim asylum in UK demands free services and the right to not pay taxes or otherwise contribute to the UK in any positive way"

 

:getout:

JamboGlen
Posted
1 hour ago, Dennis Denuto said:

There are loads of safe countries between the Middle East and the UK they could go to 

War torn france 

Japan Jambo
Posted
2 hours ago, The Mighty Thor said:

This is a truly gut wrenching read. 

 

Labour have got to go. 

 

Screenshot_20260313_074418_Bluesky.thumb.jpg.4a91a05b9cd94cb8e30ef18567a0d99c.jpg

 

#prayfortaxdodgingracisthalfwits 🙏

 

if he's stuck in Dubai perhaps his talents could be put to use defending the locals?

Victorian
Posted

Who would have thought that remaining loyal to the UK and paying the appropriate amount of tax to your income would provide you the security of not having to domicile in a war zone?

 

Ah wizny telt that when ah chose tae be a tax exile.   

The Mighty Thor
Posted

Better than that, the bold Mr Middleton also crashed his company, bumping the great British tax payer of around £1.25 million of your pounds after taking £4 million in 'directors loans'

 

Aye but come and take us home but.

 

Grade 1 fud. 

 

 

Victorian
Posted (edited)

Anyway,  Labour.

 

They're too slow or not shrewd enough to spot an open goal.   Rising oil prices and rising wholesale gas prices arising out of a war is an open goal to emphasise the importance of continuing to build more resilence,  security and independence into our energy generation and supply.

 

Jist open up ra North Sea!!!   No that's really ****ing stupid because all resources extracted are subjected to the great energy price fixing racket.   We'll just continue to make progress towards sustainable generation that isn't a hostage to global war mongering by  psychopaths and paedophiles.   Cheers.

Edited by Victorian
JudyJudyJudy
Posted
24 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

Better than that, the bold Mr Middleton also crashed his company, bumping the great British tax payer of around £1.25 million of your pounds after taking £4 million in 'directors loans'

 

Aye but come and take us home but.

 

Grade 1 fud. 

 

 

I’ve never heard of  him . 

 

 

 

The Mighty Thor
Posted
5 hours ago, JudyJudyJudy said:

I’ve never heard of  him . 

 

 

 

Im surprised as he makes content and comment that is bang in your facey/insta bandwidth. 

 

Big fan of Farage.

 

Was being touted for London Mayoral candidate until his criminal prosecutions came to light. 

 

 

JudyJudyJudy
Posted
52 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

Im surprised as he makes content and comment that is bang in your facey/insta bandwidth. 

 

Big fan of Farage.

 

Was being touted for London Mayoral candidate until his criminal prosecutions came to light. 

 

 

 

image-23-10-21-06-56-4.gif

joondalupjambo
Posted

Reeves has "found" some money.

 

Diadora Van Basten
Posted
1 hour ago, joondalupjambo said:

Reeves has "found" some money.

 

I would rather they just told Trump and Netanyahu to stop. Rather than waste Taxpayers money paying over inflated oil prices. 

  • 3 weeks later...
Gundermann
Posted

Keef... who needs new doctors, eh?

 

bafkreidf5eboedqwqecgrau6zbihx7zp3ainizk

Posted

Thames Water trying to negotiate a deal, the terms of which would make it exempt from regulator fines until 2030.

 

Here's your deal.

You're Nationalised. Game over. Done. Bye bye.

The Real Maroonblood
Posted
14 minutes ago, Cade said:

Thames Water trying to negotiate a deal, the terms of which would make it exempt from regulator fines until 2030.

 

Here's your deal.

 

You're Nationalised. Game over. Done. Bye bye.

That’s what should happen.

The company is a disgrace.

  • 2 weeks later...
Footballfirst
Posted
7 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

Revealed: Mandelson failed vetting but Foreign Office overruled decision https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/16/revealed-mandelson-failed-vetting-but-foreign-office-overruled-decision?CMP=share_btn_url

 

Starmer is toast if this is true 😂

It's not just that. If the report is correct, then the government is exploring ways to avoid disclosing the documents as requested by parliament, just as Trump's administration is avoiding full disclosure of the Epstein files after Congress voted for their publication.

The Mighty Thor
Posted
1 minute ago, Footballfirst said:

It's not just that. If the report is correct, then the government is exploring ways to avoid disclosing the documents as requested by parliament, just as Trump's administration is avoiding full disclosure of the Epstein files after Congress voted for their publication.

Either way I can see Starmer getting emptied over this.

 

That slimy wee dick Wes Streeting will be jockeying for the big job.

Posted
24 minutes ago, The Mighty Thor said:

Revealed: Mandelson failed vetting but Foreign Office overruled decision https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/apr/16/revealed-mandelson-failed-vetting-but-foreign-office-overruled-decision?CMP=share_btn_url

 

Starmer is toast if this is true 😂

 

Surely not?!? I've been told for months on here (not by you, I may add, you've seen them for what they are) that Labour aren't actually bent and it's just little oopsies like forgetting to pay tax 

Dennis Denuto
Posted
51 minutes ago, Taffin said:

 

Surely not?!? I've been told for months on here (not by you, I may add, you've seen them for what they are) that Labour aren't actually bent and it's just little oopsies like forgetting to pay tax 

I’m probably one. 
 

For what it’s worth I think Starmer should go for the Mandelson situation. No idea why Labour keep bringing him back from the dead. 

Footballfirst
Posted

Predictable response from the government

 

From the Beeb

 

The prime minister did not know Lord Mandelson failed security vetting for the role of US ambassador until earlier this week, the government has said.

A spokesperson said the decision to go against the recommendation of the vetting agency was taken by officials in the Foreign Office.

 

 

Posted

It's quite legitimate to state it was Foreign Office civil servants who decided that and did not inform No10.   Because it might be true.   If it isn't true it will come out and will be curtains for Starmer.

Dennis Denuto
Posted
11 minutes ago, Victorian said:

It's quite legitimate to state it was Foreign Office civil servants who decided that and did not inform No10.   Because it might be true.   If it isn't true it will come out and will be curtains for Starmer.

Yeah lying now would seem a strange strategy, unless they are so deep in the lie that they can’t get out of it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...