Jump to content

Foster Gillette bid to buy club


Newton51

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, eyesandears said:

Surely we listen to what he's got to say? Why does he want to by us, how much is he willing to invest that we can't invest through our own means, what % does he want to take 10%, 25%. 49%, 51%, 75%, 100%? Each shapes our response.

Ann Budge and the benefactors will be gone at some point and I hope the FoH Board are more open minded to potential investors than some of the comments above. Remember it's under Ann Budge and FoH that we're heading for the Championship assisted by a large slice of skulduggery along the way. 

I'm not saying he's the guy for us but we can't start being a closed minded members group or our club will be goosed and I say that as an FoH member.

 

Said on the other thread that the foundation could perhaps look at some sort of 50+1 rule similar to what they have in Germany. This would allow outside investment whilst ensuring the club remains totally still in control of by FOH. Perhaps an increased version like 75% where overwhelming control sits with the FOH. I'm not sure the legal details if its something we as a club could carve into our terms as an organisation, or if we could petition the league to denote some sort of rule like that for clubs that want to market themselves as fan owned (to ensure it can't be reversed by a third party looking to take control). 

 

Obviously taking outside money comes with a lot of risks, SMG and that debacle should sit in most peoples minds. Any investment the club takes should be entirely on the clubs terms - i.e someone who is investing in Hearts the football club, not Hearts the business. If someone comes along with a load of money with a clear plan and strategy to build the club up to rival the OF in size, then we'd be daft not to listen to them, but as a fundamental principle I don't think a penny should be taken unless the club remains majority fan owned - could even have them taking up the mantel of CEO similar to Budge. Making it substantially more than 50% ensures we can safely keep the club in fan hands, even if circumstances dictate selling shares to raise capital. 

 

I suspect we'll be looking at further stadium development in the not so distant future which would mean a real need to raise more money. Obviously the foundation does a fantastic job, but that main stand cost in excess of £20m. Outside investment would be needed if we were to redevelop another part of the ground, or acquire any of the land around Tynecastle. Whilst obviously the other stands would be less as facilities wouldn't be as numerous, we're still talking a multimillion pound development if we did want to expand any further. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 286
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Beast Boy

    14

  • redjambo

    10

  • will-i-am-a-jambo

    7

  • Famous 1874

    7

eyesandears
2 minutes ago, OTT said:

 

Said on the other thread that the foundation could perhaps look at some sort of 50+1 rule similar to what they have in Germany. This would allow outside investment whilst ensuring the club remains totally still in control of by FOH. Perhaps an increased version like 75% where overwhelming control sits with the FOH. I'm not sure the legal details if its something we as a club could carve into our terms as an organisation, or if we could petition the league to denote some sort of rule like that for clubs that want to market themselves as fan owned (to ensure it can't be reversed by a third party looking to take control). 

 

Obviously taking outside money comes with a lot of risks, SMG and that debacle should sit in most peoples minds. Any investment the club takes should be entirely on the clubs terms - i.e someone who is investing in Hearts the football club, not Hearts the business. If someone comes along with a load of money with a clear plan and strategy to build the club up to rival the OF in size, then we'd be daft not to listen to them, but as a fundamental principle I don't think a penny should be taken unless the club remains majority fan owned - could even have them taking up the mantel of CEO similar to Budge. Making it substantially more than 50% ensures we can safely keep the club in fan hands, even if circumstances dictate selling shares to raise capital. 

 

I suspect we'll be looking at further stadium development in the not so distant future which would mean a real need to raise more money. Obviously the foundation does a fantastic job, but that main stand cost in excess of £20m. Outside investment would be needed if we were to redevelop another part of the ground, or acquire any of the land around Tynecastle. Whilst obviously the other stands would be less as facilities wouldn't be as numerous, we're still talking a multimillion pound development if we did want to expand any further. 

Good post. Good enough to post it twice 😉 And yes this is the sort of mid to long term thinking we need and investors to support FoH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, annushorribilis III said:

Would someone oblige me buy telling what the etiquette is when a prospective buyer comes along - given that FoH is supposed to be in ownership already , how does it work re prospective bidders ? Now & in the future ?

I could be wrong but I'm sure it was take 95% of FoH Members to agree to the sale which makes it highly unlikely. 

 

Stuart Wallace spoke about this at a HMSA Shareholders meeting and he said that if we ever wanted to raise additional money by selling a stake in the club it would be hard due to the 95% rule.  (I may be wrong as it was while ago and happy to be corrected). 

 

Edit - just checked my notes it's a 90%/10% majority required

Edited by TurboT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

upgotheheads

Gillett is one of several parties in recent times to contact Hearts about potentially buying a stake in the club.

 

this s the bit that interests me. Shows we have potential that's been spotted by others. All the more reason to tell them where to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

annushorribilis III
2 minutes ago, TurboT said:

I could be wrong but I'm sure it was take 95% of FoH Members to agree to the sale which makes it highly unlikely. 

 

Stuart Wallace spoke about this at a HMSA Shareholders meeting and he said that if we ever wanted to raise additional money by selling a stake in the club it would be hard due to the 95% rule.  (I may be wrong as it was while ago and happy to be corrected). 

Thanks - but specifically , it says the interest was knocked back by Hearts - who at Hearts ? And given that the club is already supposed to be in FoH hands were FoH involved in this "knock back"  -or would/should FoH  have been involved ?

I'm not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lord Beni of Gorgie
50 minutes ago, The Old Tolbooth said:

Jesus, keep this guy away from Hearts please, his father says all you need to know about him, absolute prick of a guy! 

If I was judged on my old man I'd be struggling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did the effort by the FoH Board to make it easier to sell the club to an outside investor get to?  They had an insecure email 'survey' but it has not yet been through an AGM or EGM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, ExPatTam said:

The guy has a reported net worth of $700,000,000 - we've surely got to listen.

How do you make a small fortune owning a football club?

 

Start with a large fortune...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Glamorgan Jambo

Just for info these Gillet’s have never had anything  to do with Gillette the razor/personal care products company (part of P&G now).

They make money off sporting franchises and associated businesses. Delighted they’ve been told to bolt.

 

Besides FOH what would our benefactor think if his years of support for HMFC ended up

effectively in the pockets of some low rent grifters.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King

His wealth is obviously alluring and the possibilities but there would need to be so many stipulations attached to the deal it would probably not appeal to him. Lots of Americans looking at buying into clubs in Scotland just now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pasquale for King
2 minutes ago, Glamorgan Jambo said:

Just for info these Gillet’s have never had anything  to do with Gillette the razor/personal care products company (part of P&G now).

They make money off sporting franchises and associated businesses. Delighted they’ve been told to bolt.

 

Besides FOH what would our benefactor think if his years of support for HMFC ended up

effectively in the pockets of some low rent grifters.

 

Fair point, we’ve went down that route before, Hibs/Dundee or even Dundee United haven’t done much with US owners, and as for Man Utd well . . . . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dagger Is Back

Never ever again, should we be seduced by people like this.

 

Interesting that the sharks are starting to circle.

 

Folks like us have worked bloody hard to bring our club back from the brink. 

 

The club belongs to us as much as the city does. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the older folk on the board we could get a banner for the next match with fans. Something along the lines of 

 

Anne Budge is a mado we want the man from Colorado 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

gashauskis9
2 hours ago, Bigteam said:

FOH cant do it alone, that is proven by the fact we have a "secret" backer who puts in more money than everyone else combined! Although Gillet might not be the right guy we certainly need other additional investment

Then he can invest in FOH like everyone else. The benefactor is supporting the day to day finances, FOH is not.  Two different elements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dagger Is Back said:

Never ever again, should we be seduced by people like this.

 

Interesting that the sharks are starting to circle.

 

Folks like us have worked bloody hard to bring our club back from the brink. 

 

The club belongs to us as much as the city does.

 

This in spades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuck Berry said:

AFC Wimbledon are often cited as a good example of a fan owned club and that is fair, however the fans, via the Dons Trust, don't own 100% of the club.  It's around 75%, the remainder is in private hands

 

FOH are only taking over 75.1%, with the rest in private hands. Ann Budge the majority (of the remainder) and me a tiny wee bit :D

 

Edited by Dunks
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ainsley Harriott

Tell him hes welcome to sign up for the FOH and pump millions in via them if he likes

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Famous 1874
35 minutes ago, Dunks said:

 

FOH are only taking over 75.1%, with the rest in private hands. Ann Budge the majority (of the remainder) and me a tiny wee bit :D

 

Is the remaining 25% in individual hands as opposed to a company?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Famous 1874

No harm in talking to him and explaining the situation with the FOH. 


Wonder how much he would be willing to invest and for what percentage. Extremely likely he would want a decision making percentage. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tambo_The_Jambo said:

Mega pages of banter gone right there😞

 

Not at all. The OP was our wingman right from the off with his thread title. ;)

 

Banter away, chaps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eyesandears
14 minutes ago, Heartsmad1874 said:

D50CC0A8-CAE9-4C61-85A2-8FABF5F85735.thumb.jpeg.54fc3b0c3baa82d3e2eeb3c6149c6c17.jpeg

 

Over to Stuart Wallace then. Oh and that statement suggests the club and FoH haven't even replied. Surely not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Tambo_The_Jambo said:

Mega pages of banter gone right there😞

Alan Stubble thinks different, know what I mean?

 

:look:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

David McCaig
2 hours ago, GinRummy said:

I doubt he’ll part with all that. 

That’s ok... half will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, redjambo said:

 

Not at all. The OP was our wingman right from the off with his thread title. ;)

 

Banter away, chaps!

Just hope the wingman takes it on the chin.  🤷🏿‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Morgan said:

Just hope the wingman takes it on the chin.  🤷🏿‍♂️

 

I'm sure he will do. He was only a whisker away from spelling it correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Greedy Jambo

"I'm looking to invest significantly"

 

My ears perked up when i read that, i must admit. 

Imagine if he's talking in terms of English Premiership money 😲

We're all moaning about a 10 million stand doubling in price and he comes along with 100 million. 

Fantasy land perhaps. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't want him .He would probably trim the squad

Edited by Hearts007
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Class of 75 said:

I just googled him and apparently his family are worth $250 million. 

 

 

What was the date of that? I saw that figure on a report from 2001. More recent figures are $700m (the dad)

 

A tenth of that would do 😁

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barack said:

 His Daddy is worth $700 million. 

 

 

Please tell me he's an only child 🙏

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Barack said:

Course he would. He can piss off if he thinks we're some kind of Dragon's Den experiment. 

 

We've not pumped millions into the club, to negate precisely this type of mercenary looking for a hobby, only to drop them and lube up at the first hint of money. 

 

Phrases like "invest significantly." He'll move onto some mid-table English Championship side soon enough.

 

Its maybe not a super PC view, but I have a perception of Americans as being very money orientated. After Robinson & Romanov leading to the brink of death, who you are matters just as much as what you can offer. If you're investing in a club like Hearts, its a labour of love, not a get rich quick scheme. We don't need to take his money. We have the FOH plus benefactors to manage the current situation. 

 

It doesn't sound like he's all that passionate about who he gets involved with, which concerns me too. He could have used this statement to set out why he wants involved but instead it was brief and pretty half arsed. It sounds like he just wants involved in a club rather than any particular one. 

 

A bunch of positives he could have used are: invest in the promising youth system, invest in infrastructure to help realise the clubs potential. recognising the club is a sleeping giant, untapped potential. Even just some cursory research of who we are. 

 

Instead it comes over as 'look at the money, look at the money,  no don't ask why, just look at the money'. We just looked at the money with SMG and it blew up in our face. I'd be very cautious, his motives and expectations aren't clear and his family previous with Liverpool is obviously not encouraging. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Class of 75
3 minutes ago, neilnunb said:

 

 

What was the date of that? I saw that figure on a report from 2001. More recent figures are $700m (the dad)

 

A tenth of that would do 😁

 

 

Defo 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tambo_The_Jambo said:

The fact that we are about to be fan owned could be a stubbling block 

 

There are certainly some on here who say that we should at least listen to his offer while it's still available. After all, hair today, gone tomorrow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Famous 1874
33 minutes ago, Barack said:

Course he would. He can piss off if he thinks we're some kind of Dragon's Den experiment. 

 

We've not pumped millions into the club, to negate precisely this type of mercenary looking for a hobby, only to drop them and lube up at the first hint of money. 

 

Phrases like "invest significantly." He'll move onto some mid-table English Championship side soon enough.

Agreed mate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chuck Berry said:

AFC Wimbledon are often cited as a good example of a fan owned club and that is fair, however the fans, via the Dons Trust, don't own 100% of the club.  It's around 75%, the remainder is in private hands (which was to raise capital for the purchase of Kingsmeadow years ago).

 

They know the limitations that this creates, there's only so much money available.  However, it's something they by and large accept. League One is probably their limit with an occasional foray into the Championship.

 

Hearts will still need to look at and consider private investment when FOH takes over, although maybe not controlling interest.

Portsmouth fans also did well for a while, but sold out.

Unless the FOH builds up a huge pot of cash they are always going disadvantaged financially. Banks won’t lend football clubs money so an investor (Person or company) with cash is ultimately required to fund capital projects or even just supporting day to day running. 
But would the FOH be able to build up £5mm+ cash? I suspect not, the desire will nearly always be to pump it into the playing side to improve playing fortunes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libertarian

He has to realise that if he wants to be involved with Hearts that he will never own the club and that he would have to work with the supporters. If he wants to be the biggest investor that's fair enough but he will never own us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, eyesandears said:

Over to Stuart Wallace then. Oh and that statement suggests the club and FoH haven't even replied. Surely not.

Hopefully Stuart can talk him him round to taking out a direct debit and becoming a another one of our pledgers. Be interested to see what he would 

pledge per month. £10k a month for the next 5 years and then we’ll see how serious he is 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Barack said:

You again...?! 

 

God loves a troll.

Ex Tim Pat has a habit of posting this sort of nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...