Jump to content

Morton's 3rd goal, should it have been disallowed


special agent oso

Recommended Posts

special agent oso

No sorry, a Morton player flicked it on and it went in off a partick defender, but his foot is clearly over the line when he releases the ball.

Edited by special agent oso
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walter Bishop
5 minutes ago, special agent oso said:

No sorry, a Morton player flicked it on and it went in off a partick defender, but his foot is clearly over the line when he releases the ball.

Is part of his foot on the line?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jonnothejambo said:

Blurry image but as far as I can tell the prick linesman isn't even looking at the player taking the shy.

I'm happy you use the word shy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Findlay
1 minute ago, davemclaren said:

When did shy get replaced by throw in? 🤷🏼‍♂️

Probably when bye kick got replaced by goal kick 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jonnothejambo said:

Blurry image but as far as I can tell the prick linesman isn't even looking at the player taking the shy.

 

But ref Bobby Madden was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jonnothejambo said:

Blurry image but as far as I can tell the prick linesman isn't even looking at the player taking the shy.

This is why the EPL have VAR, every decision taken is micro examined and criticised. Maybe the prick linesman is busy watching for infringements in the box or watching for tossers diving or whatever else he might have to do.

I am enjoying watching the pundits bitching about VAR ruining the game but they are the very people who scrutinised 6 different camera angles on every query after the game which led to VAR. Be careful what you wish for.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

chuck berrys hairline

Boy had been doing it all game my understanding is feet have to be behind the line when taking a throw in. Instance in the first half practically took a step onto pitch then threw the ball 🤨🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CloustonHMFC

No it shouldn’t have been. Both feet must be touching or behind the line, it’s a weird way to take a throw in but it’s legal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, chuck berrys hairline said:

Boy had been doing it all game my understanding is feet have to be behind the line when taking a throw in. Instance in the first half practically took a step onto pitch then threw the ball 🤨🤣

Like many things to do with football your understanding is incorrect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Noticed that at the time. VAR would have sorted that ^_^

 

Only saw the last 30 minutes of that game, but the comeback was ridiculous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...