Jump to content

The Gay Footballer


Hampden Demolition

Recommended Posts

Bazzas right boot
3 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said:

Mibbees aye, mibbees naw.

 

 

Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 660
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • i8hibsh

    72

  • Norm

    35

  • ri Alban

    25

  • Morph

    21

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

7 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said:

Exactly why i said to some im a arsehole

 

Or probably to many i am

I don’t think you’re an arsehole, but I do think you are prejudiced.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

 

Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍

:qqb006:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geoff Kilpatrick
1 minute ago, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

 

Tbh, I'm Not surprised a cat owns your ass either. 😂😂👍

More like the wife decided it was a great idea.

 

:facepalm:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
Just now, Morph said:

Sorry didn’t mean to have a go, there are just some utter cretins in this thread and folk have the brass neck to give it the “don’t need awareness, we’re a completely inclusive society”. 

 

We’re not even a completely inclusive forum.  Cannot imagine what it’s like being a gay hearts fan reading some of this utter pish. 

 

 

The same as a straight person reading this pish tbh. 

 

The undercurrent of racism, homaphobia, bigotry and sexism is an eye opener. 

 

Takes all kinds tho, I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Weakened Offender said:

 

Why do they need protected if the country is so nice?

 

Why do we need any form of protection laws for anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soapy Soutar
3 minutes ago, Morgan said:

I don’t think you’re an arsehole, but I do think you are prejudiced.

 

 

Fair enough

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
1 minute ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said:

More like the wife decided it was a great idea.

 

:facepalm:

 

 

The GK household pecking order. 

 

The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 

😉

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Geoff Kilpatrick said:

More like the wife decided it was a great idea.

 

:facepalm:

Who’s wife?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

 

The GK household pecking order. 

 

The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 

😉

 

 

He’s only third?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hercules said:

I’ve not read much of this thread either, but I’m sorry, if I see a man with a dress on, I have to have a double take. To me that’s not normal. I know normal isn’t the correct word but it’s all I have. 

I get that. So frequent now almost every 2nd day...hence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said:

Never been a fan on the girl on girl either tbh

Like to see porn stars with stiffys on your screen do you?

 

Interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PTBCAL said:

At the end of the day everyone should respect everyone’s beliefs regardless if they agree with them

 

 

Nonsense. Respect is earned. I will never respect the teachings of religious scripture for example and I SHOULD never have to.

 

Should you have to respect the beliefs of Adolf Hitler?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said:

I fail to see what the big deal is here,ive never done any harm by gay people the are free to do what the wish i just dont believe its right but whatever they choose to do is upto them.

 

What they do is against my beliefs thats all,they and folk on here more than entitled to be against what i think thats fine by me

 

 

It is as right and natural as opposite sex for the fact it is nature.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, kila said:

 

Good luck keeping those real feelings bottled up

 

 

 

 

He doesn't like girl on girl but yet he thinks being gay is wrong

 

:wtfvlad:

 

I will say this now. There is NOTHING better in this world than girl on girl. I'd take sniffing the bedsheets after 2 hot women have been rolling about in them all night ovet Hearts winning the league*

 

*may not be strictly true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

 

 

Nonsense. Respect is earned. I will never respect the teachings of religious scripture for example and I SHOULD never have to.

 

Should you have to respect the beliefs of Adolf Hitler?

I call Godwin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FWJ said:

I call Godwin!

 

 

Wasn't referenced during talking about anything bad but yeah it was relevant. 

 

I just don't get the whole 'you must respect someone's beliefs'. Utter poppycock. I will respect only beliefs I see as decent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

 

The GK household pecking order. 

 

The Wumin- kitty cat- Geoff. 

😉

 

 

 

:laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Marvin said:

 

I bet you first typed fags, realising your faux pas changed it to ciggies before anyone noticed :laugh2:

I didn't get as far as actually typing it but yes I had to revise my original thought...🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, colinmaroon said:

 

Wasn't going to post on this thread but the exaggerated blaspheming does it.

 

Two people in the last while have been in the courts fighting unfair dismissal and discrimination for their beliefs.

 

Richard Page, long serving Justice of the Peace said in a private conversation that he believed a child was better served being brought up by a mother and father.  Someone overheard and reported him and as a result he was sacked as a JP and lost his non-exec director of an NHS Trust.  He appealed and lost as the judge said, and I quote,

 

"He had the right to believe what he believed but not to articulate it!" - Staggering!!!

 

Felix Ngole kicked off his social work course because he said on his own Facebook page he believed in the Bible's view on marriage, that is between a man and a woman, and he has just won in the Court of Appeal after losing his first appeal in the High Court.  Again, he was reported anonymously! 

 

In the court hearings, the University argued that Felix had ‘lacked insight’ into the effect of his posts on social media. During his Fitness to Practice hearing, the University had told him that the expression of his Christian views was unacceptable and was effectively told either to renounce his faith or stay silent on pain of losing his career. Yet Felix says he felt he could not surrender his faith.

 

In some shocking exchanges from the High Court hearing, the University of Sheffield implied that Felix was not allowed to express the Christian viewpoint on same-sex marriage or homosexuality on any public forum, including in a church.   The Court of Appeal condemned the position of the university whereby people would live in fear if private expressions of views were overheard and could be reported anonymously.

The Court ruled that: “The mere expression of views on theological grounds (e.g. that 'homosexuality is a sin') does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views will discriminate on such grounds.” It was further recognised that Felix had never been shown to act in a discriminatory fashion.

The hypocrisy of the secular forces who say that they can say what they like, including bitter and abusive attacks on Christians and Christ and yet don't even allow Christians to "articulate" their beliefs in public reveals the new bolshevism that is socially engineering this country and, they say it's all for the better!!!

Open your eyes!  20% of young females self-harm; 18% of young people think life isn't worth living.  Suicide rates accelerating.

There's a line from a hymn by Graham Kendrick, "we have sacrificed our children on the altar of our gods."

The law is that gay sex is legal and we obey the law but, the frantic bile of the Humanist Association against any simple expression of the faith they hate with a passion draws the most vitriolic abuse - all in the name of tolerance, of course.

PS If you want to take me to court for expressing Biblical views on homosexuality, I would ask for several other offences to be taken into account.  For example, I preach against lying, stealing, hatred, religious teaching that emphasises truth but leaves out love and emphasising love but leaving out the Truth etc.

Live your lives as you want as long as you stay within the law but, if the law goes against your beliefs - e.g. what did the gay rights do in that situation and yet the hypocrites say they can do it but you Christians can't.  They spend all their times forcing B & B operators out of business for their beliefs; suing bakers etc.  It is the human condition, with a few wonderful exceptions, the best of which was that swear word that's constantly used on here, Jesus, to become the abuser and there is more abuse directed in high profile cases against Christians than Islamaphobia, homophobia.

Welcome to the age of Christophobia!!!

 

Related to this, I see there's a doctor who is claiming religious discrimination as the reason he was sacked. Based on the fact that he said he would refuse to use the "she" pronoun when dealing with a transgender man. 

 

In that instance, he shouldn't have a leg to stand on. If his employer says that's the policy, that employees use the pronouns the patient identifies with, he follows their policy or ****s off. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soapy Soutar
1 hour ago, Sarah O said:

Like to see porn stars with stiffys on your screen do you?

 

Interesting.

I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said:

I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended

 

 

And what is it about homosexuality that makes you think it isn't as nature intended? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Soapy Soutar said:

I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended

 

 

 

Is it natural to want to watch people procreating?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Boris said:

 

Is it natural to want to watch people procreating?

Probably. It's not like all the animals in the field are all trying to sneak off for a bit of clandestine pumping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Soapy Soutar
2 minutes ago, Boris said:

 

Is it natural to want to watch people procreating?

We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Normthebarman said:

Probably. It's not like all the animals in the field are all trying to sneak off for a bit of clandestine pumping. 

 

:rofl:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Governor Tarkin
9 hours ago, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

The undercurrent of racism, homaphobia, bigotry and sexism is an eye opener.

 

The good old days.

 

:glorious:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Soapy Soutar said:

We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman

 

Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others?

 

Cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Boris said:

 

Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others?

 

Cool.

He's got a point. I'm pretty open minded but I draw the line at a Dirty Sanchez or Cleveland Steamer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Governor Tarkin said:

 

The good old days.

 

:glorious:

 

 

 

Brings a tear to the eye

 

:sob:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Normthebarman said:

Related to this, I see there's a doctor who is claiming religious discrimination as the reason he was sacked. Based on the fact that he said he would refuse to use the "she" pronoun when dealing with a transgender man. 

 

In that instance, he shouldn't have a leg to stand on. If his employer says that's the policy, that employees use the pronouns the patient identifies with, he follows their policy or ****s off. 

 

 

Dr "Got your test results sir"

 

Man in dress "it is Madam actually"

 

Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

 

 

Dr "Got your test results sir"

 

Man in dress "it is Madam actually"

 

Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer"

:lol:

 

Well played, sir. Well played. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Governor Tarkin
21 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

 

 

Dr "Got your test results sir"

 

Man in dress "it is Madam actually"

 

Dr "Madam, you have testicular cancer"

 

:D

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Governor Tarkin
53 minutes ago, Boris said:

 

Ah, so some sexual practices are more normal than others?

 

Cool.

 

You could make a solid arguement that the sexual practices which have evolved over millions of years in order to optimise the survival of the species are as close to 'normal' as you are likely to get.

 

Sexual preferences are a completely different kettle of fish.

Edited by Governor Tarkin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack D and coke
1 hour ago, Soapy Soutar said:

We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman

I think we can all get on board with a bit Fake Taxi :look: 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching a naked man have sex with a woman or watching a gorgeous naked woman have sex with a woman is a bit of a no brainer.  Each to their own but to me only a 'wrong un' would choose the former.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

Watching a naked man have sex with a woman or watching a gorgeous naked woman have sex with a woman is a bit of a no brainer.  Each to their own but to me only a 'wrong un' would choose the former.

 

 

You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. 

 

Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. 

Edited by Normthebarman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Normthebarman said:

You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. 

 

Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. 

 

I just miss the days of top shelf skag mags - was just a better all round experience,

 

:sob:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

doctor jambo

The Dr who was sacked was rightly fired.

he let his own prejudice interfere with his job.

If you cannot treat a patient with respect in the manner they wish because of some 2000 year old book, then its time to leave.

HIs views are not based on anything apart from dogma- its not medical opinion and research guiding his stance in any way.

NOt sure why everyone has got all touchy about pronouns either.

If its an issue - then use the persons name!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jack D and coke
23 minutes ago, i8hibsh said:

 

I just miss the days of top shelf skag mags - was just a better all round experience,

 

:sob:

 

 

 

Dunno if im showing my age a bit here but I remember the days being out with my mates up the woods or whatever and finding bags full of some old bongo mags. They must’ve had to clear room for fresh and took a bag out a walk with the dog to discreetly discard up the wids🤷🏽‍♂️😂

Kids nowadays don’t know the stress of buying your first bongo mag either! Now that was pressure :lol: had to wait for a quiet moment in the shop and quickly try to get the purchase done sharpish!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
3 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said:

We were on the subject of porn,i like housewife seduces the plumber or fake taxi all with a man an a woman

 

 

Sexist... Woman can be plumbers too. 

😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Soapy Soutar said:

I like to watch a man and a woman as nature intended

 

 

 

What if the lady uses a strap on to pleasure the man? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
54 minutes ago, doctor jambo said:

The Dr who was sacked was rightly fired.

he let his own prejudice interfere with his job.

If you cannot treat a patient with respect in the manner they wish because of some 2000 year old book, then its time to leave.

HIs views are not based on anything apart from dogma- its not medical opinion and research guiding his stance in any way.

NOt sure why everyone has got all touchy about pronouns either.

If its an issue - then use the persons name!

 

 

 

Interesting, but we back folk who's religion don't allow them to touch meat. 

 

I don't disagree with you or agree but reference your last point, that works both ways. 

 

The recipient was also touchy about using he/ she, otherwise it would have been a none issue. 

 

Why can the person who identify as x but is biologicaly y take offence and take a stand, but the doctor in this case is not allowed to use he/ she as they feel correct ? 

 

I'm with you, why not just use thier name or the term they want, but also, coming full circle why can't a person use he or she as they see fit as well. 

 

The doctor lost their job, because of this it's not just a slap on the wrist. 

 

Back to my earlier point, it now seems OK to be offended in the name of equality / freedom of speech but not OK to offend anyone, in the slightest in the sake of the same cause. 

It's a contraindication. 

 

Also, I feel the sensitivity levels are now a bit off and by going all out for diversity / equality etc we are now doing more damage as it is getting a bit silly. 

 

Freedom of speech / equality of opportunity/ expression of will and opinion, and therefore debate by it's nature cause offence. 

 

The line, imo of where it's breaking the law is now an issue, it actually goes against the principles in which it set out to protect. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bazzas right boot
Just now, Des Lynam said:

 

What if the lady uses a strap on to pleasure the man? 

 

 

That's called the jackpot? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Normthebarman said:

You're in the minority there, i8. Lesbian porn is only 4th in the categories men search for, according to pornhub. Japanese, MILF and mature all top it. 

 

Strangely enough, our female friend's looooooove a bit of girl on girl, it's top by some quite considerable distance for categories searched for by women. 

 

So that's what you view when not watching The Famous :laugh:

 

Your point about our female friends watching girl on girl is true, an ex of mine used to quite enjoy it. 

So if it comes up in my browsing history then you know why. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Marvin said:

 

So that's what you view when not watching The Famous :laugh:

 

Your point about our female friends watching girl on girl is true, an ex of mine used to quite enjoy it. 

So if it comes up in my browsing history then you know why. 

I had to google those stats. 

 

 

Honest, guv...... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Olly Lee's left boot said:

 

 

Interesting, but we back folk who's religion don't allow them to touch meat. 

 

I don't disagree with you or agree but reference your last point, that works both ways. 

 

The recipient was also touchy about using he/ she, otherwise it would have been a none issue. 

 

Why can the person who identify as x but is biologicaly y take offence and take a stand, but the doctor in this case is not allowed to use he/ she as they feel correct ? 

 

I'm with you, why not just use thier name or the term they want, but also, coming full circle why can't a person use he or she as they see fit as well. 

 

The doctor lost their job, because of this it's not just a slap on the wrist. 

 

Back to my earlier point, it now seems OK to be offended in the name of equality / freedom of speech but not OK to offend anyone, in the slightest in the sake of the same cause. 

It's a contraindication. 

 

Also, I feel the sensitivity levels are now a bit off and by going all out for diversity / equality etc we are now doing more damage as it is getting a bit silly. 

 

Freedom of speech / equality of opportunity/ expression of will and opinion, and therefore debate by it's nature cause offence. 

 

The line, imo of where it's breaking the law is now an issue, it actually goes against the principles in which it set out to protect. 

 

 

The thing is, private entities and institutions are allowed to have their own rules as long as they don't break the law. Which is why a lot have even more stringent rules than the law requires. If they say employees have to follow certain procedures, then that's what employees have to do. 

 

If the doc was not in employment, he could call them whatever he likes. Or at least until it reaches the stage of harassment. 

 

Using it once or twice would be fine. If the person asked them to stop as they found it offensive, and the doctor continued to habitually use the wrong pronoun, then that could be classed as harassment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...